BehindTheMask Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [img]https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/255228_10150919524176511_323507771_n.jpg[/img] [url="http://www.konami.com/yugioh/articles/?p=4096"]http://www.konami.co...rticles/?p=4096[/url] IDK if this is a legit card...konami might be trolling us hard core Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Le 4th topic in one day. Yay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted July 31, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 My bad I was looking for something like "blah blah blah [prophecy destroyer] blah blah blah" in the titles. you can delete/ lock this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranma1/2 Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 are you serious? this is the 4th topic? this card is starting to turn in a tour guide type of hype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 No no, this card is nothing like Tour Guide. I guess I'll make my comment here that its art style contrasts YGO's too much to possibly be real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MK-ultra Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Expelsword - 黎明' timestamp='1343708023' post='5993346'] No no, this card is nothing like Tour Guide. I guess I'll make my comment here that its art style contrasts YGO's too much to possibly be real. [/quote] no its real its made by the same people that made noble knight arctorius and anchient dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranma1/2 Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Expelsword - 黎明' timestamp='1343708023' post='5993346'] No no, this card is nothing like Tour Guide. I guess I'll make my comment here that its art style contrasts YGO's too much to possibly be real. [/quote] lol i'm not saying it's like tour guide, i'm exaggerating over the fact that this card is starting to be overdiscussed [i]like[/i] tour guide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='ranma1/2' timestamp='1343739324' post='5993497'] lol i'm not saying it's like tour guide, i'm exaggerating over the fact that this card is starting to be overdiscussed [i]like[/i] tour guide. [/quote] i don't think it's starting to be overdiscussed, it's the TCs that aren't looking down to see if there's a topic already, you can't really blame them though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 TGU is overdiscussed even though everyone understands it perfectly. This is just being made several times because people are to lazy to search for the three other threads that this was posted in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 >Prophecy Destroyer is likely based on the Devil Tarot >Posted on 11:34, which spells "hell" upside-down [IMG]http://lolvirgin.com/wp-content/uploads/conspiracy-keanu5-290x160.png[/IMG] It makes Magi-Magi worth playing in Prophecies, and Bounzer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Tentalus Therapist' timestamp='1343751711' post='5993556'] >Prophecy Destroyer is likely based on the Devil Tarot >Posted on 11:34, which spells "hell" upside-down [img]http://lolvirgin.com/wp-content/uploads/conspiracy-keanu5-290x160.png[/img] It makes Magi-Magi worth playing in Prophecies, and Bounzer. [/quote] not really, destroyer is counterproductive to the deck's setup ATM. if the next set of them that finishes the major arcana gives them a banished book setup as well, then I can see it, otherwise no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='werewolfjedi' timestamp='1343766966' post='5993729'] not really, destroyer is counterproductive to the deck's setup ATM. if the next set of them that finishes the major arcana gives them a banished book setup as well, then I can see it, otherwise no. [/quote] http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Alma_Spellbook It's decent. Why are so many people complaining about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Daiyusha' timestamp='1343767114' post='5993732'] [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Alma_Spellbook"]http://yugioh.wikia..../Alma_Spellbook[/url] It's decent. Why are so many people complaining about it? [/quote] Because they are simpletons who don't know how to play Prophecies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Daiyusha' timestamp='1343767114' post='5993732'] [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Alma_Spellbook"]http://yugioh.wikia..../Alma_Spellbook[/url] It's decent. Why are so many people complaining about it? [/quote] the spellbook of leadership should not be run more than 1, for the the tech play to grab what you used for junon.[quote name='Daiyusha' timestamp='1343767114' post='5993732'] [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Alma_Spellbook"]http://yugioh.wikia..../Alma_Spellbook[/url] It's decent. Why are so many people complaining about it? [/quote] the spellbook of leadership should not be run more than 1, for the the tech play to grab what you used for junon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='werewolfjedi' timestamp='1343768042' post='5993761'] the spellbook of leadership should not be run more than 1, for the the tech play to grab what you used for junon. [/quote] What was I telling you months ago about this? Don't be ignorant that a TCG Exclusive could make the deck better? Yeah, that applies here, and shows your ignorance in the whole matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Leadership isn't a tech. :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Agro' timestamp='1343768325' post='5993770'] Leadership isn't a tech. :\ [/quote] okay then, what is it? I never run more than 1, because it's crappy, and I side it out if the game isn't going to go long enough for it to matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='werewolfjedi' timestamp='1343768610' post='5993775'] okay then, what is it? I never run more than 1, because it's crappy, and I side it out if the game isn't going to go long enough for it to matter. [/quote]If you're playing and building a deck right, there should be a lot of Spellbooks in the Graveyard, which should be banished or returned to the Deck to be reused, which can then be recycled. And this should be happening just about every turn. Making Leadership REALLY easy to use and help out when you banish books for High Priestess or Destroyer here. It's not crappy. It works with the deck perfectly and it should only take a turn for it to matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Leadership sucks without Destroyer, regardless. But Destroyer pretty much requires you to run different cards from the norm... Well, 1 different card... Leadership. Since it's good in tandem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='werewolfjedi' timestamp='1343768610' post='5993775'] okay then, what is it? I never run more than 1, because it's crappy, and I side it out if the game isn't going to go long enough for it to matter. [/quote] Only crappy card is Control. Leadership is good with Destroyer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 i read on Shriek that the tin with this as the cover (as depicted in the OP) is gonna come out January 18th next year as wave 2.5 (fast reprint announcement much, i mean thie card isn't even out yet and they've already announced a reprint) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringerofcake Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 [quote name='~British Soul~' timestamp='1343814823' post='5994284'] i read on Shriek that the tin with this as the cover (as depicted in the OP) is gonna come out January 18th next year as wave 2.5 (fast reprint announcement much, i mean thie card isn't even out yet and they've already announced a reprint) [/quote] I don't see anything on Shriek about that. Link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 [quote name='Bringer☆de Cake' timestamp='1343855548' post='5994742'] I don't see anything on Shriek about that. Link? [/quote] http://shriektcg.twoday.net/ - http://shriektcg.twoday.net/stories/115270471/#comments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringerofcake Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 [quote name='~British Soul~' timestamp='1343855843' post='5994748'] Links [/quote] Well, that's what I get for confusing MT with Shriek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 [quote name='Bringer☆de Cake' timestamp='1343856110' post='5994751'] Well, that's what I get for confusing MT with Shriek. [/quote] ..yea since Shriek covers both TCG and OCG news, it wouldn't surprise me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.