guuu1234 Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Just curious about what you guys thought the Warrior-Types as a whole was missing to be competitive? I, personally, believe it's the lack of draw power that they have. It's virtually non-existent in any warrior build, despite them being very versatile. They already have many searchers, but I think that's at least one thing that is keeping them from being played more. Oh and if this is not breaking any rules, or turns into a troll thread, please feel free to lock it or I will move it to whatever thread is necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 No type is competitive. At all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1356829528' post='6105622'] No type is competitive. At all. [/quote] But Beast-Warriors and Sea Serpents. o: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guuu1234 Posted December 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Opps, I guess went about this the wrong way. When I was playing some time ago, a friend of mine used warriors with a focus on Synchro and Beatdown. He didn't use any Archetype Specific warriors (such as X-sabers, HERO'S, or Ninjas), he just used Warrior's as a general (Marauding Captain, Warrior Tuners, etc etc.) To be quite frank, I didn't want to use the word "competitive" at all considering how people would twist the meaning of what I originally intended (and considering the level of skill that many members in this section have, of course). What I was going for is what are Warrior Types missing to be more consistent in play, without resorting to using a specific archetype (considering that Warrior's have many monsters and is very versatile in that aspect)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Oh my Amaterasu!' timestamp='1356829976' post='6105634'] But Beast-Warriors and Sea Serpents. o: [/quote] Slipped my mind :0 Sea Serpents, only because of the sheer amount of archetypal support they have now. As with Beast-Warriors. No other type, I think, has enough support to say that. A deck running predominantly Warriors isn't a 'Warrior-Type' deck, unless it has relevant support, or something that references Warriors specifically. With only RotA in relevance, it's not a Warrior-Type deck. It's a deck with a lot of Warriors in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1356829528' post='6105622'] No type is competitive. At all. [/quote] Psychics have been meta for multiple formats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Archlord Sora' timestamp='1356830403' post='6105643'] Psychics have been meta for multiple formats. [/quote] But they aren't right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Dinosaurs. Yeah, I said it... They totally didn't need a beast and fiend to be competitive... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Ban Gateway of the Six, E - Call to 1, Semi RotA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Oh my Amaterasu!' timestamp='1356830625' post='6105648'] But they aren't right now. [/quote] So? They can be quite competitive if you build your deck in the right way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Kevin the Bird' timestamp='1356831331' post='6105658'] Ban Gateway of the Six, E - Call to 1, Semi RotA. [/quote] I like this idea. Oh and warriors are viable. Both Ninjas and Heroes are decks, albeit Ninjas don't play tons of warriors, but that's because type-based support in almost every single case sucks.[quote name='Archlord Sora' timestamp='1356831335' post='6105659'] So? They can be quite competitive if you build your deck in the right way. [/quote] That's not how "not right now" works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1356829528' post='6105622'] No type is competitive. At all. [/quote] [IMG]http://i1342.photobucket.com/albums/o767/QMM1337/Photobucket%20Desktop%20-%20Deep%20Space%201997/Reaction%20Images/YBhQb.gif[/IMG] Beasts, Fiends, Dinos... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Note that all these types bar Dinos are actually entirely archetypal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Borderline Unplayable' timestamp='1356832074' post='6105671'] Note that all these types bar Dinos are actually entirely archetypal. [/quote] Psychics, goddammit. They are good, I tell you! ):< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Borderline Unplayable' timestamp='1356832074' post='6105671'] Note that all these types bar Dinos are actually entirely archetypal. [/quote] Still mainly mono-typing though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Psychics? You mean... PsySHITS! Ohohoho I'm so clever~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Borderline Unplayable' timestamp='1356832235' post='6105677'] Psychics? You mean... PsySHITS! Ohohoho I'm so clever~ [/quote] Don't diss psychics. Ultimate Axxon Kicker will kick YOUR axxon. /bad pun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Mønkey' timestamp='1356831976' post='6105670'] [IMG]http://i1342.photobucket.com/albums/o767/QMM1337/Photobucket%20Desktop%20-%20Deep%20Space%201997/Reaction%20Images/YBhQb.gif[/IMG] Beasts, Fiends, Dinos... [/quote] In an average 40-card 'Fiend-Type deck', please explain how many of those directly reference 'Fiend-Type' in their card text or otherwise give you a reason for playing a deck full of Fiend-Type monsters. And so on. I understand what you mean, but in the context of this topic and my actual meaning, nah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Archlord Sora' timestamp='1356832435' post='6105679'] Don't diss psychics. Ultimate Axxon Kicker will kick YOUR axxon. /bad pun [/quote] Maybe if he plays Beastcraft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Borderline Unplayable' timestamp='1356832235' post='6105677'] Psychics? You mean... PsySHITS! Ohohoho I'm so clever~ [/quote] *insert laugh here* [img]http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m17ay46dbI1rqbw33o1_500.jpg[/img] OT: They are missing a broken archetype, duh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Pyros the the most powerful type ever, clearly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpakha Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 I think he means a warrior deck without any archetypes at all. If he didn't, 6 sams still broken as long at gateway exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Missing? Warrior-Types have Double Lance, Photon Thrasher, Dododo Buster, Junk Servant, Bull Blader, Strike Bounzer, Excalibur, Blade Ninja, and Gandiva. Warrior-Types are a lifestyle. They are anti-establishment, they are the counterculture, and they are up in your face. Plus, Warrior-Types have their own theme song. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyKZgfJvN2c Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1356832538' post='6105681'] In an average 40-card 'Fiend-Type deck', please explain how many of those directly reference 'Fiend-Type' in their card text or otherwise give you a reason for playing a deck full of Fiend-Type monsters. And so on. I understand what you mean, but in the context of this topic and my actual meaning, nah. [/quote] Dark Worlds are fiends. Boom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Mønkey' timestamp='1356843888' post='6105881'] Dark Worlds are fiends. Boom. [/quote] You don't seem to get what he's saying. With the exception of Gates, which is obviously Dark World support, none of the cards MENTION Fiends. It's not centralized around the type, i's centralized the Archetype and its gimmick; Discard via effect. It's not Fiend.dek, it's DW.dek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.