Sora1499 Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [center][img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20121214005742/yugioh/images/b/bb/BrotherhoodoftheFireFistLionEmperor-CBLZ-EN-OP.png[/img][/center] [center]As if these guys didn't plus enough already. Discuss.[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Psst. This card was made before any cards other than Spirit and Horse in the archetype were made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted December 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Howling Black' timestamp='1356834995' post='6105724'] Psst. This card was made before any cards other than Spirit and Horse in the archetype were made. [/quote] It's still pretty bad. +0 extra deck monsters are never good design. At least this one is more loop-proof than ptolemys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Beign a +0 ED monster isn't inherently bad design, it just requires being smart about how to do it. In fact, this card is pretty damn balanced. Anything wrong with this is the problem of Chicken or Spirit, cause this card is totally balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted December 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 But the fact remains that those cards exist, and this thing can abuse them quite effectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 How does THIS abuse them? The deck abuses Chicken which in turn abuses everything else in the deck. Stop being a complete plank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 [quote name='Archlord Sora' timestamp='1356837257' post='6105772'] But the fact remains that those cards exist, and this thing can abuse them quite effectively. [/quote] Laggia didn't abuse Rabbit. Rabbit abused Laggia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Chicken is definitely the problem here. It was designed to do too many things for one card and accomplishes all of it too easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted December 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Chicken is the biggest problem, that is definitely true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Any card can be broken if enough weight is placed on it. And we're dealing with one fat chicken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 30, 2012 Report Share Posted December 30, 2012 Wait, the effect for this is "for the rest of the turn"? The times I played this, it was like the same as Duality, in the sense you couldn't have Summoned that same monster in the same turn. (Of course, this was back when we only had these 3) Nice to know its effect is better then I thought it was. [quote name='Agro' timestamp='1356839853' post='6105830'] Any card can be broken if enough weight is placed on it.[/quote] >Magician of Faith >Metamorph >etc *irrelevant* [quote name='Agro' timestamp='1356839853' post='6105830']And we're dealing with one fat chicken.[/quote] It was worth the weight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.