Blake Posted February 3, 2013 Report Share Posted February 3, 2013 LIGHT Rank 4 Plant/Xyz/Effect 2 Level 4 Monsters with the same Attribute When this card is Xyz Summoned: Its attribute becomes the same as one of its Xyz Materials. Once per turn, during either player's turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card and discard 1 monster with the same Attribute as this card; During this turn, this card is unaffected by the effects of Spell/Trap cards. 2200/1800 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 3, 2013 Report Share Posted February 3, 2013 Once per turn, during either player's turn /gocrazyfolksgocrazy OT: What's your intended use for the card? You know, besides what I assume is nimbles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted February 3, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2013 Once per turn, during either player's turn /gocrazyfolksgocrazy OT: What's your intended use for the card? You know, besides what I assume is nimbles. Thanks, forgot that part. And no real intent and nothing to do with Nimbles. Just a silly single based on Hazy Flame Mantikor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 3, 2013 Report Share Posted February 3, 2013 Well it's looking good. Perhaps you could even let its effect work like manga Stardust, let it target any card for its effect. My only fear in all of this, of course, includes the fact that Dragoons is a card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 3, 2013 Report Share Posted February 3, 2013 Dragoons is a card.What if you Banish the monster from your hand instead?I mean, assuming he also based this on the Alchemy Beasts; They have a fetish for Banished cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted February 3, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2013 What if you Banish the monster from your hand instead? I mean, assuming he also based this on the Alchemy Beasts; They have a fetish for Banished cards. http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Homunculus_the_Alchemic_Being Banishing seems... too much. I mean, Dragoons IS an issue, but I don't think this is anymore the problem than, say, Armor Kappa would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 3, 2013 Report Share Posted February 3, 2013 Black, methinks your getting hung up on this being abusable in only 1 deck/1 move.Banish would be too much. Send/Discard still lets it trigger Dragoons.I guess you can't really win either way.And even if you make the discard a bonus at the end, it would just mean that it's optional in the event you have no cards in your Hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 The ATK seems underwhelming for a non-generic Xyz whose effect has an adittional cost to the detachment; you could raise the ATK a bit, or remove the discard cost; personally, I don't think the S/T protection deserves a discard, unless I am missing something. As it is right now, the card is a more splashable, but weaker, Sacred Omega. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted February 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 The ATK seems underwhelming for a non-generic Xyz whose effect has an adittional cost to the detachment; you could raise the ATK a bit, or remove the discard cost; personally, I don't think the S/T protection deserves a discard, unless I am missing something. As it is right now, the card is a more splashable, but weaker, Sacred Omega. That's the point ._. It's close enough to generic that more ATK doesn't seem like a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 yeah this card is perfectly fine as it is. dragoons is a problem but thats because its fucking dragoons and is a problem in almost any context. also i guess a lil thing worth noting is that non-light decks cant bring this out under gozen match. which is really such a minor setback but there you go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted February 5, 2013 Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 It's close enough to generic that more ATK doesn't seem like a good idea. Then you could get rid if the discard cost. As I stated, I don't think the S/T protection needs to be further "balanced" with a discard: detaching plus the fact that not every Deck can go for this should be enough. Also you will be eliminating the aforementioned "discard Dragoons" combo. But if I am missing something that turns the S/T protection so powerful to require an additional cost, please let me know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted February 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2013 Then you could get rid if the discard cost. As I stated, I don't think the S/T protection needs to be further "balanced" with a discard: detaching plus the fact that not every Deck can go for this should be enough. Also you will be eliminating the aforementioned "discard Dragoons" combo. But if I am missing something that turns the S/T protection so powerful to require an additional cost, please let me know. Why would I get rid of the discard cost? The discard cost is what makes it good without being a more generic Sacred Omega in exchange for 200 ATK. The Dragoon issue isn't eh discard, it's the fact that this changes attribute. The discard can trigger any Atlantean, so that's not even a solid point to remove the discard. It's meant to be much more generic, so why would I make it stronger than 2300, at most, and remove the discard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.