Destiny HERO - Malicious

[Agro]

Card A is useless @2. Therefore it MUST be broken at 3!

Malicious, specifically, was put @2 BECAUSE is was causing problems @3.

[Wildflame]

It's not completely useless at 2, Tele-Tefnuit is (kind of) a deck. Although I'd rather see this @ 3 than Tengu tbh.

[Superdoopertrooper]

Malicious, specifically, was put @2 BECAUSE is was causing problems @3.

 

Just like Injection Fairy Lily was banned for "causing problems", and let's not forget the almighty Abyss Soldier.

[Agro]

Injection Fairy Lily and Abyss Soldier weren't put to 2 because they interacted too well with their other copies while at 3 like Malicious, and more recently, Tengu do.

That isn't a valid counterargument.

[Aerion Brightflame]

Two things, one: Agro, Dooper. Please just stop the pointless head butting. It was funny at first, but now it's just getting dull and repetitive. And it's kinda taking over to many threads now.

 

I'll say the same I always say when we see this thread: COULD Mali come to 3? Yes, quite easily.

 

Should it? By nature of it's design, it shouldn't be, but the official banlist isn't decided by Design.

[Superdoopertrooper]

Injection Fairy Lily and Abyss Soldier weren't put to 2 because they interacted too well with their other copies while at 3 like Malicious, and more recently, Tengu do.

That isn't a valid counterargument.

 

It doesn't matter why they were hit here, the point is that everything in history has been hit because it was thought to be a problem at whatever number it was before. Just because cards were hit doesn't necessarily mean they should have been, and the same is true for Mali. So saying "it was hit because it was causing problems at 3" literally means nothing.

[Toffee.]

It doesn't matter why they were hit here, the point is that everything in history has been hit because it was thought to be a problem at whatever number it was before. Just because cards were hit doesn't necessarily mean they should have been, and the same is true for Mali. So saying "it was hit because it was causing problems at 3" literally means nothing.

Using this logic, Raigeki would be@3.

[Superdoopertrooper]

Using this logic, Raigeki would be@3.

 

Using your decidedly limited understanding of this logic could result in Raigeki going to 3, but for those who have the nous to grasp its actual simple meaning, it would not.

[Agro]

Using your decidedly limited understanding of this logic could result in Raigeki going to 3, but for those who have the nous to grasp its actual simple meaning, it would not.

YOU don't even understand this logic.