Majestio Angel

[Hydra Iron Man]

This card is Banished instead of going to the Graveyard. When this card destroys a Monster by battle, it is Banished instead of going to the Graveyard.During the End Phase you declared an attack with this card, Banish it.

 

 

I think this will probly run in a macro Cosmos Deck?
i dunno. Plz comment ty

NOTE: No spam, and i accept constructive criticism ty

[AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW]

For being an Ishzark that is much easier to get out, I don't think it needs to come along with so many restrictions. Freely D.D. Crow'ing a lackey at the cost of losing this card entirely seems to rip you off pretty much. You could get rid of that, and this card should still be ok. However, if you feel like this suggestion would break it, then you could consider changing its Type to Fairy to prevent it from being searchable by RotA (and because it fits the flavor from the name/pic much more nicely than Warrior).

 

Since banish-oriented Decks can't rely on Fissure or Macro much anymore, then this card would be nice to run in there just for the disruption (and 1900 no-Tribute bodies are nice). Since it's a Warrior, I suppose it might pop up in some sort of Warrior-themed Deck as well, but only if it didn't off itself for attacking.

[Delibirb]

Pretty cool. Minor OCG errors:

 

"When this card would be sent to the Graveyard; banish it instead."

 

Should be the first sentence, and Monster/Banished are not capitalized.

 

Besides OCG, it certainly doesnt seem overpowered in its effect, but you may want to lower his attack by 300-400 points, IMHO. Do you plan on making more Majestios centered around the banishing?

[Hydra Iron Man]

yes, i plan to make a majestio archetype. i dont want to lower its atk because 1900-0 for some reason looks cool to me. i appreciate yourr comment, both of you. However, majestio's will revolve around banishing, so first comment guy, i wont be downsizing its effect. People, ty very much for posting. TY

[Sleepy]

The card is underwhelming.

It also doesn't really complement Macro Cosmos at all.

If you want something that will banish the other monster and be lost as well, D.D. Warrior Lady is the better option.

If you wanna banish what you kill. D.D. Crazy Beast stays in play and is just 500 ATK weaker, which is a much easier drawback to work with.

 

Maybe for something that would have some sort of interaction with Macro in a weird way, I'd expect to see this effect the other way around. Something along the lines of "If this card would be banished, send it to the Graveyard instead". Though, don't listen to this line unless you have a bigger plan for it.

 

OCG:

If it destroys a monster by battle, banish it. If it would be sent to the Graveyard, banish it. If it declared an attack, banish it during the End Phase.

 

It's all continuous effects that to be honest, don't do much of a favor to it.

[Hydra Iron Man]

By the way people. I ask that you rate this topic. ty for your cope

Ty for your comment. Unfortunetly, i cannot use your useful and helpful comments in any way.Majestios will revovlve around Banishing for power, Special Summoning banished, blah b lah blah.

[AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW]

Ehh, I don't really acknowledge the existence of the rating stars 90% of the time. But if making the card underwhelming for the sake of the archetype is your plan, then nobody can really stop you. The suggestions were really based on if this card were generic, since we didn't really know you were making an archetype around such a mechanic. Still, even if the archetype is banish-oriented, it would be immensely helpful to have at least some of your no-Tribute beaters being able to stick around, for protection or whatever other reason you may want it out there. Besides, its likely going to be banished after hitting the field in the first place, it does not need to rush its way there.

[Hydra Iron Man]

Okay people! i got what i needed! thank you for your support. Any admin who reads this plz lock ty

[Sleepy]

By the way people. I ask that you rate this topic. ty for your cope

Ty for your comment. Unfortunetly, i cannot use your useful and helpful comments in any way.Majestios will revovlve around Banishing for power, Special Summoning banished, blah b lah blah.

I can respect that. I aknowledged the suggestion has little to do with this card's plan up there. It was just me writing stuff as it occured to me. Like thinking out loud.

 

I thought it would be part of something else.

However, even as part of a bigger strategy, this card doesn't seem all that helpful. How do you plan to make it work?

I can see other pieces of said archetype doing something, and a card like this being that one piece that is just not cooperating enough.

Like that Shark card whose's name I don't remember that had 1800 ATK and just banished itself after attacking. Banisharks work like that, but they still don't use that card as far as I know.

 

So I ask, what's it's contribution?

 

EDIT:
I wanna also point out that I started and finished writing this before the above post appeared to me.

As of a rating. I usually don't like giving ratings. I'd much rather just explain what parts of a card I think work or not, because I'd sometimes just get ratings without explanation in the past and it'd personally frustrate me. Though, if you are specifically asking for it, I'll try.

 

I know it's part of an archetype in the making now. However, when judging a card in the "SIngle Cards" section, our work just consists on examining the interaction of the fictional card with any possible IRL card in the current game. That said:

It doesn't really have a place anywhere. It's like throwing away your resourses, making your opponent a favor. It also doesn't complement combos like Zero Force or anything obscure and fun like that. D.D. Warriors do it better. D.D. Crazy Beast and Lesser Fiend do it better. If I had to give it a serious rating, it'd have to be a 6/10.

 

I'd have to ask you about that strategy you have in mind. I'm always eager to know how people make this sort of effect work in a deck.