Judgment Of The Warlock

[yugiohmakermasta]

Changes:



Lore: 2 Level 6 monsters

if your life points are at least 3000 points lower than your opponents: You can detach 2 Xyz Material from this card; half your opponents life points. This card cannot attack the turn you activate this cards effect.

You can only control 1 face-up "Judgment Of The Warlock".

 

 

Lore: 2 Level 10 monsters

        You can only activate this card If your Life Points are at least 3000 points lower than your opponent's: Detach 2 Xyz Materials from this card;cut your opponent's Life Points in half. You cannot conduct your Battle Phase the turn you activate this card's effect. You can only control 1 face-up "Judgment Of The Warlock."

 

 

This is an idea I came up with when I was deciding if I should start making XYZ monsters.

  Here is my first attempt at an XYZ monster and hope its not broken.

   I was not sure about how much atk and def points I was going to give it or what rank I was going to make it, so I decided to go with what it has now .

 

   I don't think this card is that broken but I want honest opinions and any OCG/PSCT fixes as that is an area that is not of my strong suit.

[Trebuchet MS]

Lore fix:

 

"You can only activate this card If your Life Points are at least 3000 points lower than your opponent's: Detach 2 Xyz Materials from this card; cut halve your opponent's Life Points in half. You cannot conduct your Battle Phase the turn you activate this card's effect. You can only control 1 face-up "Judgment Of The Warlock"."

 

You went a little too far in depowering it, and now it's very mediocre for the effort in making it. It's easily outclassed by Number 6. I'd preferably raise its stats to give it more staying power.

[yugiohmakermasta]

made the changes to the effect, and attack/def points. I hope that now its a little better and can be a viable card.

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

Although the stats are better compared to what you initially posted; 2100-2400 stats for a Rank 10 aren't that great/worth the effort to bring out, especially with an effect that's already outclassed by Number 6, who possesses additional/better effects. (This card requires you to have less LP than opponent, burns both of its Xyz Material to accomplish the same thing as Atlandis).

 

A suggestion would be to give it better effects, other than just halving your opponent's LP and at least 2800-3000 stats. The way it is now, even normal Rank 4/5 monsters can destroy it easily (especially with no protection against card effects, etc.)

[Baragan]

I wouldnt play that card, couse the only effect is just to half your opponent LP AND you make -1 couse you cannot attack. It has also too low ATK. So a total useless card. And I forgot: make it a rank 5 or 6 monster

[yugiohmakermasta]

I wouldnt play that card, couse the only effect is just to half your opponent LP AND you make -1 couse you cannot attack. It has also too low ATK. So a total useless card. And I forgot: make it a rank 5 or 6 monster

I have made some changes since then. Now you can conduct your battle phase, this card however still cannot attack. I also changed it level because I later decided it would be better as a lower rank than what it was.

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

That being said, while you did lower the Rank, Atlandis still outranks it in terms of using its LP halving effect (only needs to detach 1 Xyz Material although it needs to get rid of its "equip Number" also, not prevented from attacking or limited by your Life Points being x amount lower than your opponent) and its overall stats. 2150/2500 is alright, but still relatively UP'ed.

 

Like I mentioned in an earlier post, you might want to give this card some protection from card effects (or for that matter, other effects that can make this card worth running over Atlandis, Focus Force or any of the other viable Rank 6 monsters out there). At the moment, there's no reason why someone would run this over the other cards I mentioned. You can add card destruction or something; doesn't matter, because to sum up this card: It's a more restrictive/watered-down variant of No. 6 [apologies if this sounds harsh]