宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted November 4, 2013 Report Share Posted November 4, 2013 Ah! Er... I guess 2 days has passed, huh? Heh... heheh. Oh, what? It hasn't been 2 days? Oh, damn. I-I mean, that was unexpected! Wasn't it...? I hope I'm not looking like a fool to you guys since I'm seriously dying of embarrassment right now...B-by the way! Forget you've seen that title! Forget it! 1, 2 ,3, Boom! There! You forgot that title even existed! [spoiler=....]1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner DARK MonstersWhen this card is Synchro Summoned: Target 1 Monster on the field: Its ATK and DEF is reduced to 0 and effect(s) negated. If you have a DARK Synchro Monster and at least 7 Cards in your Graveyard: this card gains this effect: When a card leaves the field: You can pay 500 Life Points; it is returned to it's owner's deck instead. This card must be face-up in order to activate and resolve this effect. [/spoiler] E-erm... Are you still here? W-w-why? Are you really taking the time to read this? C-c-could it be? Do you.. actually care for me? *fidgets and tries to look away from viewer* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Lez Posted November 4, 2013 Report Share Posted November 4, 2013 Let me see. Reduce the ATK & DEF of 2 monsters to 0, negate effects, easy to summon, 2600 ATK & DEF + return to deck effect...Wich is kinda weird. When this card leaves the field, it could be sent to deck or hand already, wich would already send it to your extra deck automatically...so this would only avoid banishing or sending to Graveyard. Why dont you just pick 1 of those and make this card a little more balanced.Imo this card is to strong..thats a personal opinion - but you know, its extremely easy to summon and has absolutely no drawback, (except the ridiculously low cost to return it to deck).Suggestion:How about a cost for the ATK/DEF reducing thing? - Like reduce it's own ATK or Target 1 opponent's and 1 own monster to reduce ATK/DEF & negate effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted November 4, 2013 Report Share Posted November 4, 2013 Last effect's condition is kind of ridiculous for the phase where it'd matter the most(early-mid game). And the double Paladynamo on-summon is ridiculous. I'd say make it target a single card, since obviously an orgy is bad, right? Last effect's condition can easily be changed into controlling another DARK synchro without the grave requirements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted November 4, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2013 Let me see. Reduce the ATK & DEF of 2 monsters to 0, negate effects,Now targets 1 monstereasy to summon,Not THAT easy...return to deck effect...Which needs a specific requirement to useWich is kinda weird. When this card leaves the field, it could be sent to deck or hand already-Can't do that to herself anymore.EDIT: I think I've addressed most of the issues you two brought up. The Grave Requirements are meant to resemble to CF!V Limit Break mechanic. So I'm keeping that. This was made as some kind of grave control/recycler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted November 4, 2013 Report Share Posted November 4, 2013 Personally, I wouldn't have minded the first effect targeting 2 monsters as I understand how difficult can be to Summon this card (the easiest way I can think of is by using Black Salvo, who requires its own deck). But I guess targeting only 1 monster keeps her at bay. After your changes, what I'm not liking now is the LP cost of spinning cards to the Deck: While the effect can be highly disruptive, I find paying 500 LP too high, which can quickly stack up and and end up hurting you badly. In my opinion it would be fine without any LP cost at all as it already has a requirement to work. But if you feel it needs the cost, then at least reduce it to 200~300 LP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr-magic_bunnehs Posted November 4, 2013 Report Share Posted November 4, 2013 Lol ! Vanguard reference. Btw the card is awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
宇佐見 蓮子@C94 Posted November 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2013 Bump. For reasons of.... Bumping, I guess..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.