Jump to content

The Fiend Megacyber: Discussion


Recommended Posts

TheFiendMegacyberDB1-EN-R.jpg

 

Back in my days, when Cyber Dragons and all those other nifty stuff that can Special Summon themselve didn't exist, we had this. This card was powerful in many older formats, but now, it's completely forgotten. And even when people play it now, they shouldn't... at all. You must first give your opponent an advange to Special Summon this card. Monsters weren't strong back than, so this card was very imperessive, but now, it is going to get killed pretty quickly. Still, it's an excellent card for your old school collection.

 

Discuss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Black Fang

Megacyber is easy wit Ojama Trio, which got limited recently, and i still love Megacyber very much although he gets very little apprecaiton anymore.

 

its not as good as it use to be..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cydra is 6 or 8 times better.

 

6 or 8? Using my formula, which involves taking the fifth term of the Maclaurin series that comes from the converging alternating p-series of the derivative of the function for which the graph of the attack and defense points are revolved around the integrand of the combined sum of letters in its description in numerical form with its cross-sections being pentagons, taking the answer and finding the fourth degree term of the Taylor series, I come up with (4.2e^3.2/3.45e!)x better; please share your formula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

megacyber was the first card i ever pulled ultra rare, and will always be my favorite monster EVER (!!!!!!!!!!) my dark deck with him can fight back against even the best cydra decks (believe me, i've faced enough of them to know) personally i ate the way cydra is abused (though that is just my opinion and i accept COMPLETELY that you are entitled to your own) i will only EVER use cydra in a cybr styl deck. period. sorry if i offend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

megacyber was the first card i ever pulled ultra rare' date=' and will always be my favorite monster EVER (!!!!!!!!!!) my dark deck with him can fight back against even the best cydra decks (believe me, i've faced enough of them to know) personally i ate the way cydra is abused (though that is just my opinion and i accept COMPLETELY that you are entitled to your own) i will only EVER use cydra in a cybr styl deck. period. sorry if i offend.

[/quote']

 

Did you really have to register to bump a 7-month old topic and say this?!

Nobody cares about this pile of text that contains too many misspellings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

megacyber was the first card i ever pulled ultra rare' date=' and will always be my favorite monster EVER (!!!!!!!!!!) my dark deck with him can fight back against even the best cydra decks (believe me, i've faced enough of them to know) personally i ate the way cydra is abused (though that is just my opinion and i accept COMPLETELY that you are entitled to your own) i will only EVER use cydra in a cybr styl deck. period. sorry if i offend.

[/quote']

 

Did you really have to register to bump a 7-month old topic and say this?!

Nobody cares about this pile of text that contains too many misspellings.

 

Wow. I didn't know this was 7-months old. Stupid noob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cydra is 6 or 8 times better.

 

6 or 8? Using my formula' date=' which involves taking the fifth term of the Maclaurin series that comes from the converging alternating p-series of the derivative of the function for which the graph of the attack and defense points are revolved around the integrand of the combined sum of letters in its description in numerical form with its cross-sections being pentagons, taking the answer and finding the fourth degree term of the Taylor series, I come up with (4.2e^3.2/3.45e!)x better; please share your formula.

[/quote']

 

Teach meh yer mathz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realized that this was ancient when I saw that Grav posted in it.

 

...wait' date=' what does "e!" mean? I thought the factorial function was only defined for the domain of (non-negative?) integers, and e isn't an integer.

[/quote']

 

You're right, you can only take the factorial of a integer, because a factorial is multiplying the integer by all integers between it and 0. Therefore, you can't do it with e.

 

Also, why was this bumped?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realized that this was ancient when I saw that Grav posted in it.

 

...wait' date=' what does "e!" mean? I thought the factorial function was only defined for the domain of (non-negative?) integers, and e isn't an integer.

[/quote']

 

You're right, you can only take the factorial of a integer, because a factorial is multiplying the integer by all integers between it and 0. Therefore, you can't do it with e.

 

Also, why was this bumped?

 

Because someone posted in it.

 

Anyhow, locked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...