Master Hyperion Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Back in my days, when Cyber Dragons and all those other nifty stuff that can Special Summon themselve didn't exist, we had this. This card was powerful in many older formats, but now, it's completely forgotten. And even when people play it now, they shouldn't... at all. You must first give your opponent an advange to Special Summon this card. Monsters weren't strong back than, so this card was very imperessive, but now, it is going to get killed pretty quickly. Still, it's an excellent card for your old school collection. Discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Cydra. No discussion here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Black Fang Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Megacyber is easy wit Ojama Trio, which got limited recently, and i still love Megacyber very much although he gets very little apprecaiton anymore. its not as good as it use to be.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Too situational compared to CyDra. CyDra is semi'ed now so if you REALLY want more monsters that can be ss easier than normal, but not recommended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Your opponent activates Scapegoat... you can summon 2 of these instantly But Cyber owns this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 It was good when there wasn't any Cyber Dragon out but now....it sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfguy26 Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 oldie but goodie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted March 19, 2008 Report Share Posted March 19, 2008 Cydra is 6 or 8 times better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 19, 2008 Report Share Posted March 19, 2008 Cydra is 6 or 8 times better. 6 or 8? Using my formula, which involves taking the fifth term of the Maclaurin series that comes from the converging alternating p-series of the derivative of the function for which the graph of the attack and defense points are revolved around the integrand of the combined sum of letters in its description in numerical form with its cross-sections being pentagons, taking the answer and finding the fourth degree term of the Taylor series, I come up with (4.2e^3.2/3.45e!)x better; please share your formula. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted March 19, 2008 Report Share Posted March 19, 2008 I picked random numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 megacyber was the first card i ever pulled ultra rare, and will always be my favorite monster EVER (!!!!!!!!!!) my dark deck with him can fight back against even the best cydra decks (believe me, i've faced enough of them to know) personally i ate the way cydra is abused (though that is just my opinion and i accept COMPLETELY that you are entitled to your own) i will only EVER use cydra in a cybr styl deck. period. sorry if i offend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 personally i ate the way cydra is abused You were responsible for its limiting? i will only EVER use cydra in a cybr styl deck Hmmm. I've never heard of a styl deck. pl0x exlpain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 CyDra>>>>>>>>>>this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Cyber Dragon pwns this easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 megacyber was the first card i ever pulled ultra rare' date=' and will always be my favorite monster EVER (!!!!!!!!!!) my dark deck with him can fight back against even the best cydra decks (believe me, i've faced enough of them to know) personally i ate the way cydra is abused (though that is just my opinion and i accept COMPLETELY that you are entitled to your own) i will only EVER use cydra in a cybr styl deck. period. sorry if i offend.[/quote'] Did you really have to register to bump a 7-month old topic and say this?!Nobody cares about this pile of text that contains too many misspellings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 megacyber was the first card i ever pulled ultra rare' date=' and will always be my favorite monster EVER (!!!!!!!!!!) my dark deck with him can fight back against even the best cydra decks (believe me, i've faced enough of them to know) personally i ate the way cydra is abused (though that is just my opinion and i accept COMPLETELY that you are entitled to your own) i will only EVER use cydra in a cybr styl deck. period. sorry if i offend.[/quote'] Did you really have to register to bump a 7-month old topic and say this?!Nobody cares about this pile of text that contains too many misspellings. Wow. I didn't know this was 7-months old. Stupid noob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted October 4, 2008 Report Share Posted October 4, 2008 Cydra is 6 or 8 times better. 6 or 8? Using my formula' date=' which involves taking the fifth term of the Maclaurin series that comes from the converging alternating p-series of the derivative of the function for which the graph of the attack and defense points are revolved around the integrand of the combined sum of letters in its description in numerical form with its cross-sections being pentagons, taking the answer and finding the fourth degree term of the Taylor series, I come up with (4.2e^3.2/3.45e!)x better; please share your formula.[/quote'] Teach meh yer mathz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 just because i missed this card, i used it in a tournament a month ago, and won a duel in a tournament with him. it was the first time i won something in a tournament. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rise of the Eldrazi Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 FIEND MegaCYBER = Warrior type? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 I realized that this was ancient when I saw that Grav posted in it. ...wait, what does "e!" mean? I thought the factorial function was only defined for the domain of (non-negative?) integers, and e isn't an integer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 I realized that this was ancient when I saw that Grav posted in it. ...wait' date=' what does "e!" mean? I thought the factorial function was only defined for the domain of (non-negative?) integers, and e isn't an integer.[/quote'] You're right, you can only take the factorial of a integer, because a factorial is multiplying the integer by all integers between it and 0. Therefore, you can't do it with e. Also, why was this bumped? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 I realized that this was ancient when I saw that Grav posted in it. ...wait' date=' what does "e!" mean? I thought the factorial function was only defined for the domain of (non-negative?) integers, and e isn't an integer.[/quote'] You're right, you can only take the factorial of a integer, because a factorial is multiplying the integer by all integers between it and 0. Therefore, you can't do it with e. Also, why was this bumped? Because someone posted in it. Anyhow, locked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.