Sixth Sense

[Northern Sage]

 

 

Declare 2 numbers from 1 to 6, then your opponent rolls a six-sided die, and if the result is one of the numbers you declared, you draw that many cards. Otherwise, send a number of cards from the top of your Deck to the Graveyard equal to the result.

It is a 1/3 chance of drawing like crazy, and remember when milling used to be an issue?

What do you think, will it stay come January or be banned again?

Discuss.

[the_engineer]

Banned, banned and BANNED.

 

I believe i'm not the only one who is thinking this

[Goose]

I was wondering what the effect on the card would be if the mill effect was removed.  It would have an expected value of 11/6 cards which is worse than Pot of Greed without any other effect.  Most of the time you get nothing also.  Still worth running?

 

EDIT Math hard.  Not sure what I'm talking about.

[newhat]

It's useless when it fails and dumb strong when it works. Unhealthy I think.

[the_engineer]

It's useless when it fails and dumb strong when it works. Unhealthy I think.

With dragon rulers, it is NEVER useless, because if you mill a dragon, you can banish 2 of them to special summon it for your shenanigans

[Delibirb]

There is no fail with Sixth Sense, newhat. Its just always dumb strong.

 

I'd be lying if I said I'm jumping for this to be banned, but also if I said it shouldn't be. I will not be at all surprised if it does get forbidden in January.

[evilfusion]

The TCG only let it be limited because it was just released in the TCG. They are certain to ban it when the banlist is updated, the same way it's banned in the OCG.

[Dementuo]

To all the people who believe this won't be banned:

 

There is a VERY good reason why a majority of Dragon players ask eachother to side this and Return out for games 2-3.

[Toffee.]

So here's a question;
Temple of the Kings and Sixth were in the same boat.
Temple was released; Auto-banned.
Sixth was released; Limited.

What was so wrong with the former, on the grounds that both of these were subject to pure experiment and nothing else?

[Miror B]

So here's a question;
Temple of the Kings and Sixth were in the same boat.
Temple was released; Auto-banned.
Sixth was released; Limited.

What was so wrong with the former, on the grounds that both of these were subject to pure experiment and nothing else?

Different mind sets. They've kind of realized not letting you ever play with a card is a pretty big dick move.

[newhat]

I should rephrase what I said:

 

This card is not worth the effort of playing it if you mill cards; another draw to take its place would be better.

 That being said, both it and Dragon Rulers are cancerous and make a mockery of the game's normal pace.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

I want this card to stay. xD
I know, luck sacking, changing game, blah blah blah. I just like the card because of its unique effect. Doesn't have to play nice to have an interesting effect. But that doesn't mean it should stay. 

 

And your "its blah blah blah" in Dragon Rulers is invalid because Dragon Rulers.

 

I really don't see people play this that often as people think. Just saying.

[Wildflame]

I always roll 1 or 2 when playing this...

[goddamnit names are a pain]

I always roll 1 or 2 when playing this...

Then we should all declare 1 and 2, and this card would be perfectly not broken!

[Dementuo]

If it preset your numbers to 1 and 2, it might be okay @1.

[goddamnit names are a pain]

If it preset your numbers to 1 and 2, it might be okay @1.

I think instead of milling you should lose LP equal to the result times 1000. This way, you can lose at least half, if played at the start, or lose the game if too low.

[Goose]

If it preset your numbers to 1 and 2, it might be okay @1.

 

If it did that it would just be worse than Jar of Greed outside the mill but there is really better mill anyway so no one would use it.

[Azuh]

Different mind sets. They've kind of realized not letting you ever play with a card is a pretty big dick move.