Jump to content

Number 101: Silent Honors ARK


Recommended Posts

300px-Number101SilentHonorARK-LVAL-EN-UR

 

 

Level 4 monsters
You can detach 2 Xyz Materials from this card, then target 1 Special Summoned monster your opponent controls in face-up Attack Positionattach it to this card as a face-up Xyz Material. You can only use this effect of "Number 101: Silent Honor ARK" once per turn. If this face-up card would be destroyed, you can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card instead.

 

[spoiler=pulled one <3]dXsPZuZl.jpg[/spoiler]

 

So this is now my favorite card ever, and quite possibly the best R4 in the game not EXPLICITLY broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a near staple in the OCG. That's why. It's incredibly powerful.

>OCG

 

No really. OCG also put Gorz to three and hit Bubbleman. OCG is for...

 

Moving on. I feel that this card IS powerful, but almost leaning towards bad power. Not broken, just a jerk to play. What do they call those guys...STAPLES! *Shot*

 

I do like that they gave a staple a more powerful form. Not used as much, but its still cool. I was going to whine about how this kills bosses some more, but then I realized that, if you get your boss out, they shouldn't be able to pull this out. You should have won or locked something down. Now, one card top deck Xyzs are a thing, and that's my beef with this card. Other cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Summon this, absorb a monster.

> Let this get attacked once, detach to save it, then protect it till your next turn.

> Twin-Head Eagle.

>Rank up and absorb AGAIN.

> Sit back and soak up the opponent RAGE.

@Bold: While this does happen, it generally only happens when your opponent is bad or you bait them like hell into falling for it.

 

The rank up part's more casual than anything so doesn't really matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

103.jpg

While I love 103, it's certainly not the best.

 

This is, then 104 after 101.

 

106 and 103 are probably more or less equal.

 

107 isn't comparable.

 

105's meh except in a deck that can't efficiently make it.

 

102 is plain shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I love 103, it's certainly not the best.

This is, then 104 after 101.

106 and 103 are probably more or less equal.

107 isn't comparable.

105's meh except in a deck that can't efficiently make it.

102 is plain shit.


101 and 103 are on the same level to me.
Your comment on 105 was supposed to be "can," I assume.
107 is awesome, but very specific.
104 is third, almost 4th IMO. 3 level 4s takes dedication, and the effect is ok fighting some decks. 2700 ATK is awesome though. I'd also say, to properly evaluate these guys, their Chaos forms also should be. But I'm getting OT, so....oh wait, their rankings would more or less be the same. xD

The game is quickly becoming "Nuu uhh, now my SHARK takes YOUR SHARK. HA!" There are better things to use SHARK on, but lets face it, most people are doing this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


101 and 103 are on the same level to me.
Your comment on 105 was supposed to be "can," I assume.
107 is awesome, but very specific.
104 is third, almost 4th IMO. 3 level 4s takes dedication, and the effect is ok fighting some decks. 2700 ATK is awesome though. I'd also say, to properly evaluate these guys, their Chaos forms also should be. But I'm getting OT, so....oh wait, their rankings would more or less be the same. xD

The game is quickly becoming "Nuu uhh, now my SHARK takes YOUR SHARK. HA!" There are better things to use SHARK on, but lets face it, most people are doing this.

103 isn't as good as SHARK. It's format dependent and otherwise only works with Lance. While powerful, not as good as 101 at all.

 

105 was meant to be can't. He's only a good in Battlin' Boxers, but that's only if they could efficiently make it. They cannot so it's not good.

 

104's really, really good when you can make it for no real cost. I mean, a -1 to make a 2700 that beats Bujin is worth it. It's somewhat format dependant like 103, but it's almost always going to be runnable as a toolboxing option.

 

Maybe I'm being a little too harsh on 103, but it's certainly no SHARK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...