ems97 Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 Makes more sense to put it as a spellcaster. Right? Don't know if I change the second effect to destroy it or leave as it is. Image made by pokemastershay. 2 Level 4 monsters When this card inflicts battle damage to your opponent: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card to target 1 Spell/Trap card your opponent controls; inflict 500 Life Points to your opponent, and if you do, target 1 Spell/Trap Card on opponent's side of the field and destroy that target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 When this card conduct inflicts battle damage to your opponent: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card to target 1 Spell/Trap card your opponent controls; inflict to place an additional 500 life points of damage to your opponent, and if you do, If the attack is successful, target 1 spell/trap card on opponent's side of the field and return that target to their hand. Reflects Delphox's Magician Ability? It's not as solid an adaptation, comparing bouncing cards with stealing held items. As it stands, it remains outclassed by a number of other generic Rank 4s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 While this isn't a bad card by any means, as Gadjiltron already mentioned, a lot of generic Rank 4s outclass this (such as 101, Exciton, Ragna, Castel, 106, etc.) The S/T bouncing effect is nice (but adapting it to Pokemon mechanics, probably would fit Magic Bounce or something). If you intended on making it off the Magician ability, as it suggests, taking the S/T card (in a similar way to Graverobber) would've fit better. Although it's fine as it is though, just that there isn't much reason to run this over the other Rank 4 options people usually resort to playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.