-kyo- Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 When your opponent's monster declares an attack while they control 2 or more monsters: Target that monster; negate the attack, then send 1 monster your opponent controls to the Graveyard, except that target, and if you do, that target loses ATK equal to the sent monster's ATK or DEF (whichever is higher). wow no change no not the restaurant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 Its basically a better version of that Trap Joey used to use (cant think of its name right now) Pretty decent, but also situational Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 Despite how random/goofy this card is, it honestly still has a lot of potential.Plus, 2+ monsters per turn is basically the norm anyway, so it's not like it would be hard to set this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodrigo Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 itt: Yeah, better version of Magical Arm Shield. Seems very fun to play with, but not good enough for competitive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 Its basically a better version of that Trap Joey used to use (cant think of its name right now) Pretty decent, but also situational Magical Arm Shield, I assume. A bit conditional, but definitely interesting. The ATK loss is permanent, so it could mess up your opponent quite a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 Circumvents "cannot be targeted or destroyed", and it's a 1 for 1 that doesn't "destroy". Probably not worthwhile because of "2 or more" but it isn't obvious vendor trash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pchi Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 Maybe a side against decks that swarm very quickly and easily? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daigusto Sphreez Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 Probably wouldn't side because side deck room is cramped enough, and this doesn't shut things down enough to make side deck room for IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 I wouldn't side this either, as i'd rather side something that will actually help me against "matchup X" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.