B.A.M.F Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 Does the effect seem too much? I personally don't think so, cuz I believe there's a card that does the same thing or to some extent. Should the effect be worded differently? Lemme know please! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterr259 Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 OCG Fix: 2 Level 5 "Time" monsters Once per turn, when this attacking card destroys an opponent's monster by battle and sends it to the Graveyard: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; Special Summon the destroyed monster to your opponent's side of the field, its ATK becomes 0, and if you do Summon this way, this card can make a second attack during this Battle Phase. Is this what you meant? If so, It's essentially a Super Shark Drake. As a rank 5 limited to 1 archetype, it's effect isn't too bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.A.M.F Posted August 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 Thanks good sir! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dramatic Crossroad Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 What do you mean by Trol? I'm not sure if this effect is creative, i mean, it is indeed related to "Time" (it reverts time to before the monster is destroyed and re-battles), but i don't think it differs from Shark Drake as much.... If i am to compare, (which i cannot do properly, since i don't know a lot of other Time monsters), this one would be relatively easier to summon, since u need only 2 materials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.A.M.F Posted August 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 What do you mean by Trol? I'm not sure if this effect is creative, i mean, it is indeed related to "Time" (it reverts time to before the monster is destroyed and re-battles), but i don't think it differs from Shark Drake as much.... If i am to compare, (which i cannot do properly, since i don't know a lot of other Time monsters), this one would be relatively easier to summon, since u need only 2 materials. It was just my funny way of saying Troll cuz that's basically what this card does. I wasn't trying to be too creative with this card actually my other "Time" cards are a bit more interesting I think. This card is somewhat easy to summon, but at the same time isn't because there aren't any level 5's so you'd have to use specific cards to get monsters to level 5. I dunno still trying work out the kinks but once I'm done with the set I'll post em. It was just my funny way of saying Troll cuz that's basically what this card does. I wasn't trying to be too creative with this card actually my other "Time" cards are a bit more interesting I think. This card is somewhat easy to summon, but at the same time isn't because there aren't any level 5's so you'd have to use specific cards to get monsters to level 5. I dunno still trying work out the kinks but once I'm done with the set I'll post em. Also I was thinking of making a Time Con Dragon and Con & Trol would have some cool thing they do together or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 Unless you link us to these "Time" monsters, there's not too much we can say about it in regards to ease of summoning and other things. Granted, there are some "Time" monsters in existence, but they may/may not be eligible for summoning this card. As it is now, it's basically an Archetype-restricted variant of 32 (Shark Drake), like asterr259/Dramatic already mentioned. Hopefully you can work out the kinks and design the Main Deck members, so we have a better idea of how this card is supposed to function. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.A.M.F Posted August 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 I shall be posting the "Time" Set soon hopefully :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.