BertyCollosal Posted October 13, 2014 Report Share Posted October 13, 2014 Holy Sh*t, a card not in pop culture! Probably sucks, but whatever ;-; Once per turn, during either player's turn; you may target 1 Beast, Winged Beast, or Beast-Warrior Type monster on your side of the field; banish that monster to Special Summon 1 Beast, Winged Beast, or Beast-Warrior type monster from your hand, Deck, or Graveyard with a level equal to or less then the targeted monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwnyo Posted October 14, 2014 Report Share Posted October 14, 2014 So... you can discard a "Harpie" for Harpie Channeler, Special Summon a "Harpie" for its effect, and Special Summon another "Harpie" through this card? I think the effect is actually a great idea, but being able to SS such a wide variety of monsters (from the Deck, no less) for such a small cost is too strong. I would just remove the from Deck part, and I think it'll be great! Nice :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
- Minimania - Posted October 14, 2014 Report Share Posted October 14, 2014 Well, you could just put in "Special Summon a monster from your deck with the same type and level as the banished monster" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted October 16, 2014 Report Share Posted October 16, 2014 The grammar seems like it wanted to be PSCT but it mixed in older grammar in there, I'll try to fix it: Once per turn, during either player's turn: You can target 1 Beast, Winged Beast, or Beast-Warrior-Type monster you control; banish that monster ____ Special Summon 1 Beast, Winged Beast, or Beast-Warrior type monster from your hand, Deck, or Graveyard with a Level equal to or less then the targeted monster. The line I left untended is because it really depends on how you want this card to work. -If you say "to" as you had in there, then it is a cost to banish those monsters, so the banishing clause goes before the semi-colon, and you can't target your cost so the targeting part would need to go away. -If its part of the effect, then you'll use "and" to let us understand it is a simultaneous effect (what gets banished and what gets Special Summoned both happen at the same time, allowing you to not fear mistiming with cards like Desertapir). -Or you'll use "banish that monster. Then, " to denote that the banishing part is not a cost, but that it still happens before the Special Summoning. This would pretty much just be different from the "and" option in that miss-timings would exist. It's your pick depending on your idea. Leaving aside the wording, its not a bad card. Reminds me of Transmodify, except instead of +1 Level, it can get more targets but from a lower Level, and it can get different types and be loose regarding attributes, and the exchange is (hopefully) not a cost like Transmodify's. Thinking about it, that might make it sound a little bit too loose on what it can get. Not sure how it'd test out in actual practice though, so I still wouldn't call it out as problematic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted October 16, 2014 Report Share Posted October 16, 2014 Is this supposed to be Continuous? Also, since it works during either player's turn, should it be a Continuous Trap Card? Do the banish and the Special Summon happen at the same time, or one after another? If they happen simultaneously this has some rich combos with Dark Desertapir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.