Jump to content

Mystical Space Warrior - MST just went turbo


Valkyrus

Recommended Posts

Artwork

 

s/he doesn't look like a warrior, she looks more like a magician to me. 

 

s/he doesn't show the slightest relation to MST card. 

 

is s/he a he or a she?

 

i say it's BAD.

 

Lore

 

simple yet very synergistic. 

the concept of incorporating a monster in an overrated spell card is very interesting. 

 

that's all. lovelots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this format, I guess it's normal to run MST at 3, and this fits into many decks and frees space for that third copy. The 'either player's graveyard' helps too since nearly everyone will be having it. On first glance, it seems broken because you can RotA into MST, but I like it and think it'd actually be pretty good to have something like this at least currently (I don't think anyone would need to run more than 1 of this anyway.) I like it.

edit: I would suggest an OCG fix, but I'm not sure of the final part myself, so if someone could clear that up it'd be great.

 

When this card is Normal Summoned: You can add 1 "Mystical Space Typhoon" from your Deck to your hand. When this card is destroyed by battle and sent to the Graveyard: You can set 1 "Mystical Space Typhoon" from either player's Graveyard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think basically the same as the above poster: A MST searcher and 1-time recycler looks a bit too good, but still something that in theory the current TCG metagame can handle, plus it could help Tellarknights, who can search it with ROTA, to fight vs. Qlip Scouts or BA's backrows. So, card is strong, and yet good enough for TCG.

 

I agree with Son of Aphrodite in that it resembles a Spellcaster more than a Warrior; I would suggest to turn it into a Spellcaster so it is not searchable by ROTA and make it a bit more fair, but then it would lose its compatibility with Tellarknights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Artwork

 

s/he doesn't look like a warrior, she looks more like a magician to me. 

 

s/he doesn't show the slightest relation to MST card. 

 

is s/he a he or a she?

 

i say it's BAD.

 

Lore

 

simple yet very synergistic. 

the concept of incorporating a monster in an overrated spell card is very interesting. 

 

that's all. lovelots.

 

in my defense- the chick looks like she's in space, and MST is a Mystical space typhoon. Ah?~ Get it?
(who am I kidding, I just put a random picture )

 

I think basically the same as the above poster: A MST searcher and 1-time recycler looks a bit too good, but still something that in theory the current TCG metagame can handle, plus it could help Tellarknights, who can search it with ROTA, to fight vs. Qlip Scouts or BA's backrows. So, card is strong, and yet good enough for TCG.

 

I agree with Son of Aphrodite in that it resembles a Spellcaster more than a Warrior; I would suggest to turn it into a Spellcaster so it is not searchable by ROTA and make it a bit more fair, but then it would lose its compatibility with Tellarknights.

Voltex, not gonna lie, I was inspired by you to make this since you made a couple of monsters that search out some known spell/traps from the deck.

Anyway, would tellars be able to afford to waste a Normal Summon on this? Sure, maybe first turn, but that makes its recycling less likely to happen.
Might be good in Artifacts. Though with Moralltach at 1 nobody will be playing them next format.



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...