ezra627 Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Well well well, since i got a new spell card after 1 hour! Well here it is: SO CLOSE! Normal Spell Card Pay 7999 Life Points. You win the Duel. This card cannot be negated. Well this reply is for a test if it adds to posts. Oh well, it adds to MY post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 There's the mentality in card games like these where "the only LP that matters is your last, therefore you shouldn't be too fussy over your LP payment." This card practically embodies it. The only issue is where if you take a little bit of scratch damage and haven't healed it off when you draw this card, then you can truly read this card in sheer disappointment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezra627 Posted January 26, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Well for my idea, this can only be activated when you have 8000 Life Points, because to test if some idiots shall activate this when they have lower than 8000 lp :P. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 You cannot pay until you have 0 LP. If you can't pay the cost (usually because you'd lose as a result) you can't activate the card/effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinkerer Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 You can change the wording to "Take 7999 damage". It changes it from a cost to effect damage, though things can be used to negate that damage... Hmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted January 26, 2015 Report Share Posted January 26, 2015 Oh, that's an easy out. Change damage to simply losing LP like in Soul Charge. It's not damage so it's not preventable or exploitable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.