Delibirb Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 So half the yugioh community and their mothers believe this is a good side against Nekroz. Personally, while it can certainly screw with them if they even make Trishula, which they don't have to, I'd rather have cards to regain my own cards, such as of course shared Ride, to something situational like this. But, discuss anyway. No pic cause I'm on mobile.During this turn, each time a card(s) is removed from play from your hand, your side of the field, and/or your Graveyard by the effect of an opponent's Effect Monster: ● If a card in your hand is removed from play, remove from play up to 2 random cards in your opponent's hand. ● If a card you control is removed from play, remove from play up to 2 cards your opponent controls. ● If a card in your Graveyard is removed from play, remove from play up to 2 cards in your opponent's Graveyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 Being played [i]JUST[/i] for the sake of Trish seems.... Weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 Especially since Trish is becoming less and less popular in Nekroz, in favor for Valkyrus and Decisive Armor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heraldry_lord Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 Especially since Trish is becoming less and less popular in Nekroz, in favor for Valkyrus and Decisive Armor. It can actually work against Decisive Armor, but it's still pretty situational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delibirb Posted February 7, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 It can actually work against Decisive Armor, but it's still pretty situational. Yeah, decisive can be responded to with this. The major issue I have with using this is: you're still letting Trishula resolve. I'd prefer something to negate it entirely. Either that or something to screw with Nekroz concistency like Mistake etc. In regards to Trishulas popularity, I do still like it as a beater that can get searched off Schritt, and the discard effect is very helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 Especially since Trish is becoming less and less popular in Nekroz, in favor for Valkyrus and Decisive Armor.I was going to add, that aren't the 'Trish-Turbo' variants, like, vastly inferior? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delibirb Posted February 7, 2015 Author Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 I was going to add, that aren't the 'Trish-Turbo' variants, like, vastly inferior? Yeah, relying on Trishula as your sole goal is really a terrible plan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 Even with Trish being a 1-2 of, it's still an extremely unfair card that shouldn't exist, so this is just knee jerk. It's not correct, but it's stupid to have a gamestate where you have to worry about getting Trish'd, especially Because you devoted at all T1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darj Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 Especially since Trish is becoming less and less popular in Nekroz, in favor for Valkyrus and Decisive Armor. Kinda off-topic but I'm curious on this. Why is Decisive Armor gaining popularity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted February 7, 2015 Report Share Posted February 7, 2015 Kinda off-topic but I'm curious on this. Why is Decisive Armor gaining popularity? People are setting their hands because of Trish, and Decisive Armor counters that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.