evilfusion Posted April 13, 2015 Report Share Posted April 13, 2015 I love that guide. It's been years since I last saw it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Highlander Posted April 13, 2015 Report Share Posted April 13, 2015 What kind of heresy are you posting? Infenities are a balanced healthy for the game deck that requires skill and is not autopilot whatsoever. Nooo, nooo in nooo way could one eeeever assume something like that and playing the same deck for month, until it becomes routine, making the same main plays each time, or at least intending to is compleeeetely different. Full force dragon rulers were a similar non-autopilot deck, you could after all adjust ... and you could use reactan instead of burner (yea you can involve thinking). Totally healthy, no doubt involved. I love that guide. It's been years since I last saw it. True about that, this guide makes me laugh each time I see it again, similar to a photo ... Seriously, looping the same card over and over again ... yea of course I am missing a card which allows you to turn the deck into one combo (or similar kind of combo) (with combo I here refer to using one card in a loop and calling that risk vs reward for abusing a stuppid concept behind one single card). See, when Infernity got such ridiculously good support, the theme's basic concept got damaged to the point where most people associate Infernity with your scenario. That's not how the concept was probably designed. It was supposed to be a risk to give up your hand (emptying a player's hand was considered to be even more important than their LP, because without a hand, they're unlikely to make a comeback), but you get access to some marginally more powerful effects, like Archfiend's SS and search, Necromancer's revival, etc. Things like Launcher and Barrier gave Infernity TOO MUCH power for the effort and risk needed to play the Deck. ... true it is sad how the entire archetype turned into loop archefiend, abuse him as hard as you can and then end with absurd advantages, as archfiend can search cards which either revive him and other cards to create multiple pluses (or you use xyzs or synchros) loop this each single game and call playing the same thing over and over skillfull for you do not play a deck similar to chain burn or ftk decks ... yea as it is completely different from a ftk deck (or rather ft loop deck) and should in nooooo way associated with those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLG Klavier Posted April 13, 2015 Report Share Posted April 13, 2015 Nooo, nooo in nooo way could one eeeever assume something like that and playing the same deck for month, until it becomes routine, making the same main plays each time, or at least intending to is compleeeetely different. Full force dragon rulers were a similar non-autopilot deck, you could after alladjust ... and you could use reactan instead of burner. Could you give me a definiton what an autopilot deck is for you ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted April 13, 2015 Report Share Posted April 13, 2015 Dragon Rulers have always been skillful ): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Highlander Posted April 13, 2015 Report Share Posted April 13, 2015 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm And now ? I did not state that you really have that opinion, anyways your comments I have seen until now would not lead to the assumption that you would never joke around ... then again I am never too serious, so do not take everything I state too seriously. Dragon Rulers have always been skillful ): No they gave you the potential to play skillfull, however playing it against non-ruler decks rarely took too much effort, however I will not deny that the mirror can be really entertaining and require thought, unfortunately this was limited to ruler mirrors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted April 13, 2015 Report Share Posted April 13, 2015 No they gave you the potential to play skillfull, however playing it against non-ruler decks rarely took too much effort, however I will not deny that the mirror can be really entertaining and require thought, unfortunately this was limited to ruler mirrors. Fair enough, that's a pretty accurate summary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.