Jump to content

Forest Fire jumps on the bandwagon and makes a Banlist


Recommended Posts

Nobody here cares about how the OCG does things. It doesn't affect us, and the OCG is also notorious for hitting the wrong cards.

However, none of this even matters, as you aren't a TCG player, yet you come here acting as if you know everything about it, when in reality, you know nothing.

 

I've told you this before, and I'll say it again. Placing OCG logic into our TCG, DOES NOT WORK. You aren't even bothering to learn our format, and are just hellbent on shoving your OCG down our throats, and then act all anal when we call you out on it.

I'd argue that OCG logic is only unacceptable to TCG when it is directly tied to Duster or the Trap line up. Neither of which is the case here. TCG might not have 3 compuls, but pretty sure most of you're removal targets regardless. 

 

I am bothering to learn your format, which is why I'm even bothering to comment here. I called Klav out for posting a picture of salt with no words mate. That's really it. I mean say you guys ban Trish now, next list you will come back and want to further hit the deck. 

 

 

I hate to rain on your parade but he was relatively tame this thread and I enjoyed learning and discussing nekroz hits, so that's a bit rude :p

 

EDIT: Its true though, OCG logic ain't that good in tcg in general, and OCG are known for having a crazy banlist.

 

 

 

General tends to be people begging for Stratos, Duster or CED to come back. All three of which directly tie back to Traps or Duster :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'd argue that OCG logic is only unacceptable to TCG when it is directly tied to Duster or the Trap line up. Neither of which is the case here. TCG might not have 3 compuls, but pretty sure most of you're removal targets regardless. 

 

I am bothering to learn your format, which is why I'm even bothering to comment here. I called Klav out for posting a picture of salt with no words mate. That's really it. I mean say you guys ban Trish now, next list you will come back and want to further hit the deck. 

 

None of us would be complaining about Nekroz if Trish didn't exist. The vocal salt players might, but those are the ones you should never listen to anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of us would be complaining about Nekroz if Trish didn't exist. The vocal salt players might, but those are the ones you should never listen to anyway.

Unicore robs an entire aspect of the game.....Trishula is easy to play around, and there are easy ways to stop it. I'm trying to advocate hitting the longevity of the deck over the power card that you an often bait out if you plan ahead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter, as playing a Ju means you have the Exciton play, as searching Unicor is just an easy task, even if it was limited.

Sure. So you force them to give up their main out to the extra deck and the recycle for an Exciton? Pretty sure most of the decks can float off that esp if they later half of the game should be easy on from there.....

 

At this point, Dyson, I'm pretty sure you're disagreeing with me for the sake of disagreeing with me :/...I'm literally repeating myself over and over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure. So you force them to give up their main out to the extra deck and the recycle for an Exciton? Pretty sure most of the decks can float off that esp if they later half of the game should be easy on from there.....

 

When resolving that Exciton = game, then yes. and most backrow doesn't float, as "set everything to avoid trish" doesn't imply monsters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When resolving that Exciton = game, then yes. and most backrow doesn't float, as "set everything to avoid trish" doesn't imply monsters.

I actually really liked your banlist and respect your opinion. the only thing I would do is maybe make Glow-Up Semi before immediately un-restricting it completely, same with strike fighter, sacred sword and temple

wow. that is a strange sentence to even think about.

and no, this has no relevance to that quote, i just wanted you to notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even my list was better. And what the funking funk on Glow-Up @2. What does that accomplish at all? Banned Mistake, Lose 1 Turn @2. LOGIC. Sacred Sword is already @2. And Ptolemaios is the problem, not Cydrafinity. It's not a balanced card, but Cyber Drags kinda need it, and it would see hardly any play at all without Ptolemaios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...