Slinky Posted August 8, 2015 Report Share Posted August 8, 2015 2 Level 4 "Madolche" monstersOnce per turn: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card, thentarget up to 2 "Madolche" cards in your Graveyard; shuffle those cards into the Deck, also, after that, shuffle cards your opponentcontrols into the Deck, up to the number of "Madolche" cardsreturned. I personally believe this is one of the more broken cards in the entire game. It's non-target, non-destruction removal that also adds things back into your deck (or hand with Chateau) and also ignores floaters. It's a potential +4 (+5 with Ticket) that leads to crazy powerful plays and OTKs. Only problem is that it is tied to Madolche. And I thank Konami every day that it is such. So yeah, discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hallohallo Posted August 8, 2015 Report Share Posted August 8, 2015 Now that you mention it, it doesn't target. Never noticed that. I need to start playing Madolches again. Haven't even tried the new Puddingcess Xyz monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hexanort Posted August 9, 2015 Report Share Posted August 9, 2015 this card by itself is fine, since it doesnt have high stat, require madolche in grave (which isnt exactly easy because they tend to shuffle back to deck), you need to xyz madolche to get resources for this, while madolche arent exactly built for easy summons so it will need time/setup, if not for that broken field chateau, which basically allow you to take back every resource you spent, either when they're destroyed or shuffled by this card (and other madolche support)........ the only problem i have with madolche is chateau, not this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted August 9, 2015 Report Share Posted August 9, 2015 madolche arent exactly built for easy summons so it will need time/setup ITT: Madolche aren't good at xyz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.