Atypical-Abbie Posted August 22, 2015 Report Share Posted August 22, 2015 A silly Level 7 Wyrm-Type Synchro, if you put a lot of monsters into its Synchro Summon, it can become very powerful. The name is a reference to Avatar: The Last Airbender. 1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Wyrm-Type monstersThis card’s original ATK and DEF are equal to the number of monsters used for this card’s Synchro Summon x 800. During either player’s turn: You can target 1 Set card your opponent controls, then you can target 1 face-up card your opponent controls; this card loses exactly 400 ATK and DEF, then destroy the first target, then if you targeted the second target, destroy this card and the second target. You can only use this effect of “Sparky Sparky Boom Dragon” once per turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoctorMiracle Posted August 22, 2015 Report Share Posted August 22, 2015 The name is hilarious and I am glad that I found another Avatar: The Last Airbender fan. That show was amazing! Anyways, on to the effect, wyrm monsters in general now have a viable synchro to put into. With both effects being destruction effects, I can see this in some casual and maybe some advanced play in wyrm styled decks such as Yang Zings. Nice touch telling people that it's effect can only be activated once per turn so it could prevent spammage with multiple copies. All in all, good card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dr Professor Spaz Posted August 22, 2015 Report Share Posted August 22, 2015 First thing I saw: then you can 1 face-up card your opponent controlsJust had to say it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted August 22, 2015 Report Share Posted August 22, 2015 First thing I saw: Just had to say itYou know about the Advanced Clause, right?Do you have any specific thoughts about this card (because as it stands though, comment doesn't help Zazu much outside of pointing out a minor error) Let's assume he meant to put "destroy". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atypical-Abbie Posted August 22, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2015 You know about the Advanced Clause, right?Do you have any specific thoughts about this card (because as it stands though, comment doesn't help Zazu much outside of pointing out a minor error) Let's assume he meant to put "destroy".Destroy? That doesn't make much sense, I meant to say target before that. Will fix shortly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.