Daniyal Ahmed Posted October 25, 2015 Report Share Posted October 25, 2015 Hey Guys!!!So i was just looking around the yugioh wiki i and i though , Can i make a card that can be summoned using 2 different summoning methods while being practical and not creating a new completely different summoning method altogether? and this is what i came up with:Just in case you are wondering "Flip" is an actual archetype: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Flip_monsterTell me what you think of it.2 Level 8 monstersThis card is Special Summoned in face-down position. This card cannot be Flip Summoned on the turn it was Special Summoned in the face-down position. This card cannot be destroyed on the turn it was Special Summoned in the face-down position. This card can declare an attack after it is Flip Summoned.When any player's monster declares an attack: You can detach 1 XYZ Material from this card, negate the attack, destroy the attacking monster and gain its ATK points till the end of your turn.FLIP: Target 1 level 5 or below monster in your or your opponent's graveyard: Special Summon that target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted October 25, 2015 Report Share Posted October 25, 2015 You need to post the card's effect underneath your card, as it is difficult to read off of the picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniyal Ahmed Posted October 25, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 25, 2015 You need to post the card's effect underneath your card, as it is difficult to read off of the picture.understood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowsapex Posted October 25, 2015 Report Share Posted October 25, 2015 This card cannot be Flip Summoned on the turn it was Special Summoned in the face-down position.No, of course it can't. It's just been summoned.This card can declare an attack after it is Flip Summoned.I don't quite get that. Can it not attack if it wasn't flip summoned? But other than that, I like this card. It's very innovative. Though I think you should extend the destruction protection to your opponent's next turn as well. But then again, it has a lot of DEF. It's flip effect is rather powerful. Perhaps, in exchange for its attack protection and ability to steal a monster, you could lower its stats a bit?And it says it is special summoned in face-down. Is that all kinds of summons? Like say, if you revive it from the graveyard with Call of the Haunted, it would be face-down? I think you should change that to Xyz Summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniyal Ahmed Posted October 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2015 No, of course it can't. It's just been summoned.I don't quite get that. Can it not attack if it wasn't flip summoned? But other than that, I like this card. It's very innovative. Though I think you should extend the destruction protection to your opponent's next turn as well. But then again, it has a lot of DEF. It's flip effect is rather powerful. Perhaps, in exchange for its attack protection and ability to steal a monster, you could lower its stats a bit?And it says it is special summoned in face-down. Is that all kinds of summons? Like say, if you revive it from the graveyard with Call of the Haunted, it would be face-down? I think you should change that to Xyz Summon. The thing is when you overlay 2 monsters and XYZ summon this monster it is automatically put into a face-down position and on the next turn you have to Flip summon it for it to be...well...Face-up...This would mean it gets its FLIP effect and it can now be treated as a normal XYZ monster with a FLIP effect of course. Also when you revive this card from the graveyard it is in face-up position and the extra turn for flip summoning is not required. In such a case it has all of its abilities including the destruction protection for on the turn it was summoned. Also this card has quite some DEF so i think that if i increase the destruction protection for one more turn it would become overpowered and we wouldn't want that now would we?BTW, Thanks for the idea though i really appreciate your opinion. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.