M0B0X Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 You can pay 2000 LP; target 1 face-up monster your opponent controls, equip this card to that target. While this card is equipped to a monster by this effect, take control of that monster. When this card leaves the field, give control of the equipped monster to your opponent. Please comment, rate and fix if possible, I would appreciate some CnC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanashimi Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 So monster form of Snatch Steal? But weaker than Graydles? Dunno . . . all of it seems fine and balanced, maybe lower the cost? (like 1000 LP?) again, i'm not sure. Another pluses is that it's searchable via Kingremlin. So yes, SpamLvl4.dek can run this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M0B0X Posted November 14, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 14, 2015 So monster form of Snatch Steal? But weaker than Graydles? Dunno . . . all of it seems fine and balanced, maybe lower the cost? (like 1000 LP?) again, i'm not sure. Another pluses is that it's searchable via Kingremlin. So yes, SpamLvl4.dek can run this. Thanks for the feedback. I was wondering about that last line, is the OCG correct? Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♪ ♪Aria ♪ ♪ Posted November 15, 2015 Report Share Posted November 15, 2015 This card already has a decent attack for a level 4 monster, meaning without equipping, it is already good, whereas there are other alternatives to control an opponent monster, this card can be used during emergency situations...and for turning the tables for a decent cost.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted November 17, 2015 Report Share Posted November 17, 2015 EmEm thanks you.Nah, seriously, if pendulums and/or Kingremlin didn't exist I'd find this card even pretty interesting, but right now it's almost (almost!) as bad as Ariadne.It really, really isn't. The life point cost is significant, it is terrible turn 1, it targets (which is difficult to useless again two of the best decks in TCG), and is disrupted easily. I actually really like this for the reasons above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♪ ♪Aria ♪ ♪ Posted November 18, 2015 Report Share Posted November 18, 2015 "Rafflesia Seduction" has no life points cost and is better to sacrifice than this...considering the huge Lp cost and it only lasts 1 turn.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M0B0X Posted November 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2015 This card already has a decent attack for a level 4 monster, meaning without equipping, it is already good, whereas there are other alternatives to control an opponent monster, this card can be used during emergency situations...and for turning the tables for a decent cost.... EmEm thanks you.Nah, seriously, if pendulums and/or Kingremlin didn't exist I'd find this card even pretty interesting, but right now it's almost (almost!) as bad as Ariadne. It really, really isn't. The life point cost is significant, it is terrible turn 1, it targets (which is difficult to useless again two of the best decks in TCG), and is disrupted easily. I actually really like this for the reasons above. "Rafflesia Seduction" has no life points cost and is better to sacrifice than this...considering the huge Lp cost and it only lasts 1 turn.. Rafflesia Seduction has a flip effect, which means that it's slower, and only lasts until the end of the turn. It's also not searchable, has horrible stats and isn't a Level 4. This guy is, meaning that it'd be right at home in EmEm (Kozmo guys and March of the Monarchs notwithstanding). Thank you all for the CnC. Also, I'm still wondering, is that last part needed, and is the OCG right? Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.