Jump to content

Familiar Possessed - Kamina


I Hate Snatch Steal

Recommended Posts

I was debating what to do with this art:

07278231d69d227a48fe5ac0d9b749d1.jpg

 

So I thought of this:

 

ELzAv37.jpg

 

Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Must first be Special Summoned (from your hand) by tributing 1 "Familiar-Possessed" monster you control. If this card is special summoned: you can negate the effects of all face-up cards your opponent currently controls, until your next Standby Phase. Once per turn: you can target 1 card on the field; destroy that target. You must have 2 or more total "Familiar Possessed" and/or "Charmer" monsters in your graveyard to activate and to resolve this effect. If this card on the field is destroyed: you can Special Summon 1 non-DIVINE Spellcaster-Type monster with 1500 DEF from your Deck.

 

Help is appreciated with this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, i'm Familiar-Charmer.dek users and still using it until right now! (It's my Main Deck ♥)

 

Sooo another Familiar? But after reading the Summoning conditions i think "oh no, it's wrong, just wrong"

 

[spoiler=We have this y'know'']Unpossessed-AP08-EN-C-UE.png

 

Above card helps Familiar-Charmer keeping their field presence while Kamina . . . (needs control no monsters) so no.

 

Pop*ing 1 card and twice? Umm . . . nice but the summoning conditions . . . just bad, can't be SS'd via Unpossessed u.u

 

Also the last part, SS non-DIVINE familiar? So i assume this card has DIVINE attribute? (srry, imgur blocked here in my pc, i can't see the card) i also hope this card is another Lvl 4 monster like all of Familiar has.

 

My suggestions:

※ That Summoning conditions, make it like all other Familiar has, also you can make it Special/unique like:

"You can send 1 "Charmer" monster and 1 monster with the same attribute as that "Charmer" monster you control to the Graveyard to Special Summon this card from your hand or Deck."

※ Well going with above summon con-, weaken the effect "a bit" so that way that card isn't overpowered.

※ But i assume Kamina has DIVINE attribute, so i dunno . . . (mostly i only run Wynn for easy access to Lightning Chidori), but okay (can be grabbed by Mound and True Name, but seems like a bad combo)

 

And that's from me. I dunno the stats/Level/Attribute etc etc etc since imgur is blocked and i can't see the image, i'll comment from the eff alone.

 

Hope this helps~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, i'm Familiar-Charmer.dek users and still using it until right now! (It's my Main Deck ♥)

 

Sooo another Familiar? But after reading the Summoning conditions i think "oh no, it's wrong, just wrong"

 

[spoiler=We have this y'know'']Unpossessed-AP08-EN-C-UE.png

 

Above card helps Familiar-Charmer keeping their field presence while Kamina . . . (needs control no monsters) so no.

 

Pop*ing 1 card and twice? Umm . . . nice but the summoning conditions . . . just bad, can't be SS'd via Unpossessed u.u

 

Also the last part, SS non-DIVINE familiar? So i assume this card has DIVINE attribute? (srry, imgur blocked here in my pc, i can't see the card) i also hope this card is another Lvl 4 monster like all of Familiar has.

 

My suggestions:

※ That Summoning conditions, make it like all other Familiar has, also you can make it Special/unique like:

"You can send 1 "Charmer" monster and 1 monster with the same attribute as that "Charmer" monster you control to the Graveyard to Special Summon this card from your hand or Deck."

※ Well going with above summon con-, weaken the effect "a bit" so that way that card isn't overpowered.

※ But i assume Kamina has DIVINE attribute, so i dunno . . . (mostly i only run Wynn for easy access to Lightning Chidori), but okay (can be grabbed by Mound and True Name, but seems like a bad combo)

 

And that's from me. I dunno the stats/Level/Attribute etc etc etc since imgur is blocked and i can't see the image, i'll comment from the eff alone.

 

Hope this helps~

Thanks. I updated accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...