xale Posted July 27, 2017 Report Share Posted July 27, 2017 Name: Galaxy-Eyes Crystal DragonLevel: 8LIGHTDragonEffect: This card can only be special summoned from your hand by tributing 2 monsters that have 500 or less ATK. This card can only be destroyed by another "Galaxy-Eyes" monster. This card cannot be banished from the field. If this cared is targeted by a card effect, negate the activation, and if you do, destroy it.ATK/ 3000 DEF/ 2500 Anti Galaxy-Eyes?Possible use in low-ATK decks that use "Human Wave Tactics"?Please comment suggestions. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xale Posted July 28, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2017 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragulas Posted July 29, 2017 Report Share Posted July 29, 2017 Must be Special Summoned (from your hand) by Tributing 2 monsters with 500 or less ATK. Cannot be destroyed by battle with another "Galaxy-Eyes" monster. Cannot be banished from the field. When a card or effect is activated that target this card (Quick Effect): You can negate the activation, and if you do destroy it. Not sure if its summon condition limits it from being SS by other ways or its an alterbative way like OG Galaxy eyes, and if the negation does trigger or its continuous nor once per turn. Anyway on the card itself, it serve its purpose very well if that means to specifically counter Galaxy eyes photon dragon, but thats it. As a galaxy eyes itself it offers nothing to help the deck. Still searchable with melody though. Not sure why a card that can counter x card (not even archtype) is aslo the only deck that can use it (not even decently). I dont really think low ATK decks use HWT any more, there are better choices, specially if its normal monsters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted July 29, 2017 Report Share Posted July 29, 2017 Must be Special Summoned (from your hand) by Tributing 2 monsters 2 monsters with 500 or less ATK. Cannot be destroyed by battle with another "Galaxy-Eyes" monster. Cannot be banished from the field. When a card or effect is activated that target this card (Quick Effect): You can negate the activation, and if you do destroy it. Not sure if its summon condition limits it from being SS by other ways or its an alterbative way like OG Galaxy eyes, and if the negation does trigger or its continuous nor once per turn. Anyway on the card itself, it serve its purpose very well if that means to specifically counter Galaxy eyes photon dragon, but thats it. As a galaxy eyes itself it offers nothing to help the deck. Still searchable with melody though. Not sure why a card that can counter x card (not even archtype) is aslo the only deck that can use it (not even decently). I dont really think low ATK decks use HWT any more, there are better choices, specially if its normal monsters 1. Going to assume this user isn't acclimated to more recent OCG, so assume that it's a semi-nomi and requires having to Tribute 2 monsters with 500 and under ATK to summon it first. 2. There's no OPT lock on it, so any form of targeting effect (which is pretty much every common one) will be blocked; even CDI. Raigeki can still destroy it. 3. I don't think anyone really/even used Human-Wave; except in casual duels where the power creep is non-existent or something (even back in the day). ====I'd have to agree with the above user that the card is just Galaxy-Eyes (and I suppose Dark Law / Macro) anti-tech, but that's it. We already have Photon Dragun (the 20/12 L4 'mon that manga Kaito used) for that. The protection effect is fine, albeit not keen on it being immune to targeting effects (which account for most removal nowadays, though you can't do anything to it either so...) It's a Galaxy-Eyes for the support cards, but it does nothing to help out. Only way this is coming out is by tributing 2 Wizards, but you'd rather Rank 8 or search with them instead of summoning this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.