Atypical-Abbie Posted October 31, 2017 Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 Happy Halloween everyone, this is my card for this year's Halloween, and it's a giant boss monster for Zombie Decks. It requires you to banish 2 Zombies from your hand, field and GY, but it has 4000 ATK, has an effect that makes it so your opponent cannot negate its Special Summon, has a powerful banishing effect that makes it easier to use its last effect, which is a full effect protection, as long as you have more banished Zombies than in your GY, which I thought was pretty cool idea, and I may transform into an Archetype at some point. Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Must be Special Summoned (from your hand) by banishing 2 Zombie monsters from your hand, your field and your GY. If this card is Special Summoned by banishing any Pendulum, Ritual, Synchro, Fusion, Xyz or Link Monsters, this Special Summon cannot be negated. Once per turn: You can target 1 Zombie monster in your GY with DEF 0; banish that target, and if you do, banish all monsters your opponent control whose ATK is less than or equal to that target’s ATK. While you have more Zombie monsters banished than you have in your GY (min. 1), this card is unaffected by other cards’ effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theTUN Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 You need to change the summoning condition, it's way too easy to summon for a 4000-ATK monster right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 You need to change the summoning condition, it's way too easy to summon for a 4000-ATK monster right now. Reminder that you do have to explain why changes need to be made (as per the Advanced Clause). Right now, you are under the word requirement. I can agree with this though, considering the conditions and rest of the card in general (including the blanket protection effect and Armed Dragon LV7 effect). In this card's case, you do have Vampires and Shiranuis who can consistently use this; moreso on the latter because of what they do. Alternative White Dragon [for comparative reasons] only requires a card to be revealed and also locked to the hand in terms of Special Summon location, but that has a hard OPT on its summon. While it is unlikely that you will have multiple copies in your hand and sufficient banish fodder for this, I agree this is technically asking for trouble. (I mentioned Shiranuis because they have sufficient fodder to use this card efficiently, given the pool, but I am not sure if they have space for this card. Perhaps they do, and can be retrieved via Synthesis. I do not claim this as fact.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atypical-Abbie Posted November 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 You need to change the summoning condition, it's way too easy to summon for a 4000-ATK monster right now.Reminder that you do have to explain why changes need to be made (as per the Advanced Clause). Right now, you are under the word requirement. I can agree with this though, considering the conditions and rest of the card in general (including the blanket protection effect and Armed Dragon LV7 effect). In this card's case, you do have Vampires and Shiranuis who can consistently use this; moreso on the latter because of what they do. Alternative White Dragon [for comparative reasons] only requires a card to be revealed and also locked to the hand in terms of Special Summon location, but that has a hard OPT on its summon. While it is unlikely that you will have multiple copies in your hand and sufficient banish fodder for this, I agree this is technically asking for trouble. (I mentioned Shiranuis because they have sufficient fodder to use this card efficiently, given the pool, but I am not sure if they have space for this card. Perhaps they do, and can be retrieved via Synthesis. I do not claim this as fact.)I don't fully understand how banishing 6 monsters is too easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 The issue is on its summoning conditions; as in banishing 2 Zombies from anywhere to get a 4K monster out from the hand. I already noted that the chances of you even having multiples in hand at any given time / sufficient banish fodder is rare. I never said nor implied banishing 6 Zombies was easy. ====As for theTUN, you'll need to ask him what his thoughts are in specific. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atypical-Abbie Posted November 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 The issue is on its summoning conditions; as in banishing 2 Zombies from anywhere to get a 4K monster out from the hand. I already noted that the chances of you even having multiples in hand at any given time / sufficient banish fodder is rare. I never said nor implied banishing 6 Zombies was easy. ====As for theTUN, you'll need to ask him what his thoughts are in specific.Then why is it a problem that it's a 4K monster with that powerful effect? It justifies it better than any other monster that does similar things, but are much easier to Summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokutah Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 You need to change the summoning condition, it's way too easy to summon for a 4000-ATK monster right now.same casei think you both miss interpret the condition as banish 2 from every where instead of banish 2 each from everywhere (excluding deck of course ) to be fair maybe the wording is the should be: by Banishing 2 Zombie monster each from your (location) that being said though its one heck of boss monster. OPT non-target non destroy removal is strong albeit restricted on the ATK of your banished monster. all unaffected and unnegatable summon mumbo jumbo is appropriate for his class of monster so im not really gonna talk about it more and yes Shiranui push this guy to the heights of its potential being the most banish happy variant of zombie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 i think you both miss interpret the condition as banish 2 from every where instead of banish 2 each from everywere If it is 2 monsters from each area, then it's fine otherwise. Likely an misinterpretation and probably reading this while thinking of some other stuff. Though with that being said, you're bound by the Advanced Clause too, so don't post for the sole reason of saying this. ===EDIT: You're fine now. === My earlier notes about Shiranuis using this still stand, as I cannot see another Zombie oriented Deck that is willing to summon this or have the ways of recurring this. For what it's worth, yeah, the protection is fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atypical-Abbie Posted November 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 If it is 2 monsters from each area, then it's fine otherwise. Likely an misinterpretation and probably reading this while thinking of some other stuff. Though with that being said, you're bound by the Advanced Clause too, so don't post for the sole reason of saying this. ===EDIT: You're fine now. === My earlier notes about Shiranuis using this still stand, as I cannot see another Zombie oriented Deck that is willing to summon this or have the ways of recurring this. For what it's worth, yeah, the protection is fine. Yes, it is 6 monsters, 2 from hand, field and the GY. Do you think I would allow 2 from the GY to get this guy out? I'm not that crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.