snake101 Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 monsters(23)3x blue eyes white dragon3x differrent dimension dragon3x lord of d3x mystic tomatoe2x divine dragon ragnorak3x masked dragon3x dark hex sealed fusion1x spirit reaper1x treeborn frog1x sangan spells(14)1x mystical space typhoon1x heavy storm1x future fusion1x brain control3x dragons mirror3x cold wave3x stamping destruction1x monster reborn traps(7)1x torrential tribute1x mirror force2x dark bribes3x solem judgement extra(15)3x king dragun3x five headed dragon1x blue eyes ultimate dragon1x gaia force of earth1x colssal fighter3x red dragon archfiend3x stardust dragon side(15)3x wingbeat of a giant dragon3x dragons rage 1x divine dragon ragnorak3x bth3x creature swap1x dark bribe1x shrink this is just for fun fixes only Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luffy789 Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 not bad. needs polymerization though. 8.6/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zelda_tp_fan Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 not bad. needs polymerization though. 8.6/10. Why does it need polymerization? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KornKing153 Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 not bad. needs polymerization though. 8.6/10. No it does not need polymerization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 not bad. needs polymerization though. 8.6/10. No it does not need polymerization. It does, however, need good cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Lol at Polymerization. I see a dragon deck with Blue-Eyes but no Reasoning or Monster Gate. What gives? Also, lol at Dragon's Rage. Drop all 3, replace with Solemn and max it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 first of all monster gate and reasoning are not need becuase of king dragun's effect plus the dragons rage helps when they use spirit and marshmellon and scapegoat and i agree polymerization is a relly bad idea. Hurus if u ever seen this deck played like this and used correctly u would relize how dum that statement relly was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 ^ Dont make claims, when the evidence says different Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 well they should make claims when they have never faced the deck plus the idea for monster gate and reasoning is not necessary or all that good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 ^ No one one the forums has faced anyone elses deck, does this mean no one can post on peoples decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 it means they should think about it before they go oh its definitly bad cuz its not monarcs or doesn't have solems in them cuz not everyone has solems plus its not neccesairly true that no ones faced someone from this forum becuse i have though i am sure they don't want me to say who they are so i won't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 FYI: 44 card decks dont work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 not every deck has to be 40 cards exactly and plus i think its said that people discourage people from doing a original deck thats good and i am so glad that most of the time u guys don't give out advice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 not every deck has to be 40 cards exactly Any deck with over 42 cards fails plus i think its said that people discourage people from doing a original deck thats good This deck is not original' date=' nor good, it looks like any other noobs deck that i see everyday and i am so glad that most of the time u guys don't give out advice Thats because you guys cant make a deck thats fixable, make a fixable deck and we can help you Now stop your BBAAAWWWing or this thread will be locked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 well if this was a noob deck as u put it it would have things like cave dragon or kimouri dragon and besides the only advice i see u give is something like run monarcs or u say something everyone else already said so and u can go ahead and lock this if u want doesn't hurt my feelings any Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinzo637 Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 It lacks a poly and a dragons mirror. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 poly is bad and it already has 3 dragons mirrors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XanderTheGreat Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 By itself, this deck ain't THAT bad, but does need some major fixes. Monsters: King Dragun is the main man? Fine. Blue Eyes can be used since you maxed out Dragon's Mirror. D.D. Dragon, however, is a no-no. Prime Material Dragon would be better, and hell if you play OCG, play REDRUM NAO. You can play Lord of D., but since Ragnarok is a vanilla, you should drop it(or maybe have only one so Future Fusion won't be less of a deadweight). With The Dark only you should be fine. Spells:Not much to say really. If you're planning on using REDRUM, both Card of Safe Return and Arms Hole are recommended, and Burial from a Different Dimension for RFG to grave recycling. Traps: Dragon's Rage is BAD. BAD. BAD! OUT. With this out alone, you're pretty much alright... I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 well the reason i have dragons rage is to deal with reapers and marshmellon course it also helps with scapegoats and different dimension dragon helps king dragun from fissure and may smashing ground i am not sure on which one has higher defense plus it lives through mirror force and torrential and can be brought out with masked dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 Buster Blader and Dark Paladin say hi. Otherwise, this an okay deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 no one uses buster blader or dark paladin besides even if they did side it i have ways to deal with it like FGD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 If they were against F.G.D. BB or DP would both have over 5000 ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 and i could have it in defense and they couldn't get past it plus i could always use shrink Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 I take it you forgot Dark Paladin's effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.