Master Hyperion Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 I take back what I just said earlier... This card is okay. Not very powerfull, just okay. Doesn't need to be banned. I still like it's effect though that it has the ability to level himself up, as your choice to Synchro Summon a Synchro Monster becomes more various. Too bad it costs you hand advance. Also, the problem with Copy Plant is that you need to run Plant monsters, so the choices are limited to plant monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XanderTheGreat Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 Fairly good, but not game breaking because his effect can eat your hand faster than Homer Simpson in front of a dozen pork chops. But, using stuff that cause direct hand advantage, like Thunder Dragon, can somewhat help him. Somewhat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 zombie carrier embarrasses this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 Not a bad card. It's high point is it's versatility. 2 is going to be the level you like the most, but whenever you need to change that, no problem. Most of the time, it's only really good for summoning L6 and L7 Synchros. Otherwise, it just eats up too much advantage. Of course, there are always the situations where having the right monster then would win you the game. I like it, but I'm not overly excited. And yes, this could be useful in DAD Synchro. Maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 if this card was a level 1 i would use it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 ^This card would be worse if it was Level 1... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 lol no, you could discard malicious, zombies, ect. get rid of dead cards and still be useful, plus would be good for dad sync Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 10, 2008 Report Share Posted August 10, 2008 It would indeed be better as a LV1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pizzaman Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 Sorry to bump this up now, but there was a ruling given to this yesterday (on the OCG hotline... way too early for Official Database update) that the discard is not a cost, but instead an effect. So, how would this fair in Dark World? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 when I first saw' date=' I wanted to shout "BANBANBAN!!!", but this guy actaully eats your hand alot, giving you less card advantage. So I'm actually in doubt that card deserves a ban or not.[/quote'] I thought the same way but upon reading it again I realised it is not all that great. It kills your hand. Effect will prolly be used to Synchro into Stardust which will averagely be a -3 in your hand (summon, then drop 2) It could be useful in DWS or Zombie Synchro (drop Mezukis) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted August 25, 2008 Report Share Posted August 25, 2008 This name is made of awesome. The card is not, except for above mentioned Dark World Synchro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted August 26, 2008 Report Share Posted August 26, 2008 Sorry to bump this up now' date=' but there was a ruling given to this yesterday (on the OCG hotline... way too early for Official Database update) that the discard is not a cost, but instead an effect. So, how would this fair in Dark World?[/quote'] I now welcome Dark World Synchro as a good deck Horrah! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 26, 2008 Report Share Posted August 26, 2008 Sorry to bump this up now' date=' but there was a ruling given to this yesterday (on the OCG hotline... way too early for Official Database update) that the discard is not a cost, but instead an effect. So, how would this fair in Dark World?[/quote'] Meh, I still like Rescue Cat and Summon Priest Synchro better than Dark World Synchro. EDIT:No, not really. I've tried Rescue Cat again with this new format, but it's not much special without Prem.I only like Summon Priest Synchro better than Dark World Synchro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Digital.Simplicity. Posted August 26, 2008 Report Share Posted August 26, 2008 awesome card is awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted August 26, 2008 Report Share Posted August 26, 2008 One of the best Tuners, I think; goes absolutely marvelously with Dark World. I'm pretty sure it's "discarding by effect," since that's what the card says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted August 26, 2008 Report Share Posted August 26, 2008 Now im reading where it says, By this cards effect, does that mean this works with Dark world? If so, say hello to the easiest otk Dark worlds have ever seen. If not, I dont see the point of the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 26, 2008 Report Share Posted August 26, 2008 Now im reading where it says' date=' By this cards effect, does that mean this works with Dark world? If so, say hello to the easiest otk Dark worlds have ever seen. If not, I dont see the point of the card.[/quote'] Sorry to bump this up now' date=' but there was a ruling given to this yesterday (on the OCG hotline... way too early for Official Database update) that the discard is not a cost, but instead an effect.[/quote'] That's why it was bumped >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.