Guest Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 So, where on the banlist do you want to put this guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultimate Ryan Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 bannedmonster + free S/T removal, no just no, also if you dont need the S/T removal a 1900 point beatstick >.< (lol ATK) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 bannedmonster + free S/T removal' date=' no just no, also if you dont need the S/T removal a 1900 point beatstick >.< (lol ATK)[/quote'] Shouldnt matter too much if you use things called "Chainable Cards". I think it will be fine Limited. 1600 ATK is LOL ATK anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixty Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Bounce, bounce, bounce... That pretty much sums up how it's been off and on the banlist. It most likely will be limited in the next banlist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 If I were to be asked: BANNED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Limited. It proves no harm to the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Lyla > This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Limit, MST with legs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 bannedmonster + free S/T removal' date=' no just no, also if you dont need the S/T removal a 1900 point beatstick >.< (lol ATK)[/quote'] Shouldnt matter too much if you use things called "Chainable Cards".That doesn't take away that it is a monster + free s/t removal. Lyla > ThisNo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 bannedmonster + free S/T removal' date=' no just no, also if you dont need the S/T removal a 1900 point beatstick >.< (lol ATK)[/quote'] Shouldnt matter too much if you use things called "Chainable Cards".That doesn't take away that it is a monster + free s/t removal. Lyla > ThisNo. Are you trying to say Breaker should stay banned? It is a great card but does it really deserve banning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Limit the breaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 bannedmonster + free S/T removal' date=' no just no, also if you dont need the S/T removal a 1900 point beatstick >.< (lol ATK)[/quote'] Shouldnt matter too much if you use things called "Chainable Cards".That doesn't take away that it is a monster + free s/t removal. Are you trying to say Breaker should stay banned? It is a great card but does it really deserve banning? It will almost always get rid of 2 of the opponent's cards by itself (1 s/t and one monster) and thus generate advantage. If the s/t targeted by Breaker is chainable, then it is still forced to activate. This means the he still got rid of it. If that card is does not prevent Breaker from also destroying a monster that turn, Breaker still generates that advantage. If you want to avoid a loss of advantage because of Breaker and you don't have an answer to it, you must not set a s/t or play a monster, or both. In other words, Breaker punishes players for setting up a strong field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 bannedmonster + free S/T removal' date=' no just no, also if you dont need the S/T removal a 1900 point beatstick >.< (lol ATK)[/quote'] Shouldnt matter too much if you use things called "Chainable Cards".That doesn't take away that it is a monster + free s/t removal. Are you trying to say Breaker should stay banned? It is a great card but does it really deserve banning? It will almost always get rid of 2 of the opponent's cards by itself (1 s/t and one monster) and thus generate advantage. If the s/t targeted by Breaker is chainable, then it is still forced to activate. This means the he still got rid of it. If that card is does not prevent Breaker from also destroying a monster that turn, Breaker still generates that advantage. If you want to avoid a loss of advantage because of Breaker and you don't have an answer to it, you must not set a s/t or play a monster, or both. In other words, Breaker punishes players for setting up a strong field. Threatening Roar or Waboku can stop Breaker from destroying a Monster. Bottomless can stop Breaker upon summoning which would almost always happen. Breaker would still generate some sort of advantage even if he cant get rid of a monster right? Even if it is an MST with legs I dont see why it cant be Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Limit' date=' MST with legs[/quote'] And a sword, and that awesome scarlet armor. Ban, I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Limit' date=' MST with legs[/quote'] And a sword, and that awesome scarlet armor. Q4E. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Im gonna get made fun of here, but I dont think hes ban worthy... Only game-breaking cards should be banned in my opinion, hes just... good.. Limit.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Limit' date=' MST with legs[/quote'] And a sword, and that awesome scarlet armor. Q4E. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Limit' date=' [b']MST with legs[/b] That would be the freakiest thing ever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Breaker is an MST with legs. Lyla is a Breaker with boobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thegargoylevine Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Hold on, I have a question. Can Lyla's effect be used the turn she is summoned? If not, Breaker is better, especially in a Spellcaster Deck where he's needed. Along with Magician of Faith of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Yes Lylas effect can be used when it is summoned, also it can be used with priority Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 This answer your question: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silencerleader Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 This answer your question: Praise the LORD!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Lyla < this. Lyla will almost certainly only get around to destroying 1 card, thanks to its 200 loldef*.Breaker will almost certainly get rid of 2 cards on the first turn he's out with a more agreeable 1600-1900 lolatk. True, Lyla mills the cards, but Breaker is about as splashable as DMoC. (Okay, not that splashable. But it's pretty damn splashable.) He's not quite banworthy, but I see no reason not to max him in every deck... Limit, MST with a kickass cape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 DMoC is heaps splashable. If you think Breaker is as splashable as DMoC, then that would probably mean Breaker could be used in almost every deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.