Jump to content

Breaker the Magical Warrior : Discussion

CrabHelmet

Recommended Posts

Orochi Newbie

Orochi

Posted
Posted

only a n00b would say breaker isn't splashable...

 

 

enough ATK to destroy almost any lv4 cad on ATK and any LV5+ on DEF... also destroys a S/T with the only cost of removing the counter that gains when is normal summoned, and it can have more counters with apprentice magician and dark pitch stone...

 

 

i say BAN IT...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

There's more ban worthy cards than Breaker.

 

There's also more ban worthy cards than Pot of Greed. Chaos Emperor Dragon is one of them.

 

Therefore' date=' Pot of Greed should be made legal.

 

And don't judge me if you don't know me.

 

Your false logic provides us with sufficient information about you.

 

Besides' date=' I grew tired of playing the TCG weeks ago.

[/quote']

 

And I haven't played for half a year.

 

The difference is that I don't spew evidence of my stupidity all over the forums.

 

~Kenpachi Zaraki

 

Now you're under the delusion that your name carries some weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster

Guest Supreme Gamesmaster

Posted
Posted

DMoC is heaps splashable. If you think Breaker is as splashable as DMoC' date=' then that would probably mean Breaker could be used in almost every deck.

[/quote']

 

Yes, that was what I was implying. He could very well be a card that reads "Destroy 2 cards on the field. The next time you Tribute Summon a monster, you require 1 less Tribute for that Tribute Summon." He has the same power as Gyzarus when he comes out for all intents and purposes.

 

That said, he's limitworthy for using up your Normal Summon. Special Summon, and he's just a 1600 lolatk beatstick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Limited.

Hurts at 3.

Good at 1.

 

Now we get to the heart of the matter. Obviously' date=' Breaker cannot combo with itself, and it isn't Twin-Headed Behemoth, so in order to be Limit-worthy, it must be bad for the game at 3 but good for the game at 1.

 

Bad for the game at 3 is obvious.

 

Now, can someone figure out how this helps the game at 1?

 

I say for it to be limited and get yelled at. Others say limited and what happens? Nothing. It's because I'm black isn't it?

 

~Kenpachi Zaraki

 

I can't yell at everyone who does anything wrong. There are too many people doing too many things wrong for me to handle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

If I were to be asked: BANNED.

 

Limit the breaker

 

limited.

 

Limited.

 

Do you lot not know what a "discussion" is?

 

Look' date=' frankly, I don't care how many ways there are to stop CED and such. They are already BANNED.

[/quote']

 

Konami's banlist sucks. It is irrelevant to all arguments.

 

Why do you all keep focusing on my opinion?

 

Because we can.

 

I say it's counter able' date='

[/quote']

 

So is every card in the game.

 

and is useless via Special Summon.

 

Ohnoes.

 

1600 ATK is BLEH.

 

That "BLEH" is enough to run over at least 80% of all Level-4-or-below monsters that anybody ever uses.

 

If you don't like my opinion' date=' too freakin bad. I stick by it.

[/quote']

 

Aw, man. The horror. You totally owned me. I'm gonna go slit my wrists now.

 

~Kenpachi Zaraki

 

Maybe I should bring back my old above-sig. It's only relevant to a forum completely unrelated to this one and is rather pretentious' date=' but that's not important.

 

[i']- The Sage of Fire has spoken.[/i]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest PikaPerson01

Guest PikaPerson01

Posted
Posted

Lol' date=' fine by me. Wow, I never thought a discussion over a card would get so serious. I mean, I've seen murder, but this is ridiculous. [/quote']

 

Did you just compare someone tearing down wrong opinions to someone dying?

 

Lol, GTFO. XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deucalion Newbie

Deucalion

Posted
Posted

I haven't played TCG in a looong time, and I know whatever I say will probably have some grevious flaw in it. Feel free to shout at me, Crab Helmet.

 

Now, if Unlimited or Semi-Limited, it is bad for the metagame, as it is so splashable. Everyone would just max it, reducing the total number of viable options in the metagame, which is perhaps the best way to measure balance. In Limited, its power and splashability is limited to an extent where itt isn't completely broken, so there is no point in out-right banning it, and keeing it in Limited means there is one more card to play in the metagame, widening the variety, and total number of viable options in the metagame. So, I say Limited.

 

I have no idea if that makes sense or whether I'm just blathering on pretentiously. I picked this topic because all these new-fangled Lightsworn and Dark Armed Dragons are after my time. I haven't really played since the Warrior beatdown decks were top, and Breaker is simple enough for me to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

I haven't played TCG in a looong time' date=' and I know whatever I say will probably have some grevious flaw in it. Feel free to shout at me, Crab Helmet.

[/quote']

 

You know that you don't need to give me permission to do that. :P

 

Now' date=' if Unlimited or Semi-Limited, it is bad for the metagame, as it is so splashable. Everyone would just max it, reducing the total number of viable options in the metagame, which is perhaps the best way to measure balance. In Limited, its power and splashability is limited to an extent where itt isn't completely broken, so there is no point in out-right banning it, and keeing it in Limited means there is one more card to play in the metagame, widening the variety, and total number of viable options in the metagame. So, I say Limited.

[/quote']

 

I don't see how it's power or splashability is limited at all by restricting it to one copy. Since it requires no dedication at all and needs to combo with no other cards (including other copies of itself), the only way that its power or splashability would be more limited would be in the direct, literal sense of not being allowed in more than one copy per deck - and frankly, Limiting any broken card would also provide this "restriction".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tonisanoob Newbie

tonisanoob

Posted
Posted

im in 2 minds about this card (please do not take any bad grammar as a sigin of incompotince)

 

anyhoo

 

i feel tht is lyla is at 3 thn breaker should be

but thn i KNOOOO tht breaker woudl be horrible for the game at 3

 

so thn i say well one

i personally love this card its very useful

 

but as you say (and after lookign all all the arguments)

it is a hurtful card

one of the card tht can literally be thrown into any deck(almost)

wich is bad (to an extent)

 

so personally i liek this card back at 1 as a PERSONALLY liek it

but game wise it should probs be banned

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...