Azuh Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 [align=center]Yes i know, crap card, but thats not the point. [/align] * This card's "direct attack" effect can only be activated when this card is in face-up defense mode. * If the opponent has monsters on the field' date=' this card cannot use the effect to direct attack in defense mode.[/i'] I found this out when i was playing a lol E-hero Deck on WC2008, and it wouldn't allow me to attack directly while it was in Defense Mode. Then i noticed the Ruling and i was appauled! If this card cannot attack directly when a monster is on your opponent side of the field, why bother giving it a crappy effect when you can switch it to Attack Position and inflict 2000 damage instead of 1000. Honestly, one of the worst rulings i have come across... If anyone knows, is this ruling ridden from the TCG? If so, thank god... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 Old ruling is old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 That's not the worst. I have a better one for you. You can't activate Card Destruction while you control Protector of the Sanctuary because it forces your opponent to perform an action he can't do (something I totally agree with). But, you can activate Last Turn while you control Jowgen the Spiritualist, Fossil Dyna Pachycephalo or Vanity's Fiend. WTF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 yeah i've always hated this ruling. This makes Rampart Blaster one of the worst effect fusion monsters ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 i hated this ruling due to the time my main deck was rat heros oh well infernal sniper ftw as it basically dosnt get moved from the feild unless they are running monarchs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 I noticed that in both Tag Forces. Really bad ruling. But like toni said, Infernal Sniper is better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 I knew it a for a long time.It's BKSS.Please not the K in BKSS. That's not the worst. I have a better one for you. You can't activate Card Destruction while you control Protector of the Sanctuary because it forces your opponent to perform an action he can't do (something I totally agree with). But' date=' you can activate Last Turn while you control Jowgen the Spiritualist, Fossil Dyna Pachycephalo or Vanity's Fiend. WTF?[/quote'] Still doesn't beat this.This ruling is totally for NO REASON.I think Konami misunderstood when 'for no reason' is funny and when it isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 Oh noes i cant attack my opponent for 1000 with my e-hero lets all go cry in the corner [/rant] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 Yes, we know Konami sucks. This ruling is old. Locked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.