Tabris Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Destiny_Hero_-_Dogmahttp://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Destiny_Hero_-_Plasma Could've been Synchros. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 These 2 are the quite possibly the best Nomi's that exist for draw power ever. Why do they need to be Synchros? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 They would be worse as Synchros. They are very good targets for Allure, D-Draw and Trade-in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 I has envisioned (and still envision) the two to be the cornerstone of a new and improved Destiny Hero archetype, the would-have-been first archetype to promote Synchro Summonin'. Effect-wise, they're infinitely better off as Synchros.They would be worse as Synchros. They are very good targets for Allure' date=' D-Draw and Trade-in.[/quote'] I know, but there's somethin' very appealin' in turnin' an abysmal pit of an archetype into a succesful one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 They would be worse as Synchros. They are very good targets for Allure' date=' D-Draw and Trade-in.[/quote'] I know, but there's somethin' very appealin' in turnin' an abysmal pit of an archetype into a succesful one. Repeated use of apostrophes makes you sound very, very stupid.Claiming that D-Heroes are bad doesn't help you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 The fact that you couldnt use them as Trade-Ins, Allures, D-Draw Engines while as Synchro monsters sort of kills the Destiny Engine I would say no, they are better as Effect monsters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Effect and statwise, would have been decent as Synchros. Every thing else considered, they are much better as effect cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Both of them are playable, one more than the other. Plasma should be reprinted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 They would be worse as Synchros. They are very good targets for Allure' date=' D-Draw and Trade-in.[/quote'] I know, but there's somethin' very appealin' in turnin' an abysmal pit of an archetype into a succesful one. Repeated use of apostrophes makes you sound very, very stupid.Claiming that D-Heroes are bad doesn't help you. As an archetype, D-Heroes are bad. They have no real win condition and mediocre synergy. Ask yourself why they are used exclusively in small engines and never in a dedicated D-Hero deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Both are excellent D Draw and Trade In targets, and Plasma is playable by itself outside REALLY dedicated D Hero decks(unlike Dogma). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 They would be worse as Synchros. They are very good targets for Allure' date=' D-Draw and Trade-in.[/quote'] I know, but there's somethin' very appealin' in turnin' an abysmal pit of an archetype into a succesful one. Repeated use of apostrophes makes you sound very, very stupid.Claiming that D-Heroes are bad doesn't help you. As an archetype, D-Heroes are bad. They have no real win condition and mediocre synergy. Ask yourself why they are used exclusively in small engines and never in a dedicated D-Hero deck.That's still a purpose. It may not focus on them, but it still makes them good. Of course, half of the D-Heroes are crap, and only 1/10 are good draw engines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 They would be worse as Synchros. They are very good targets for Allure' date=' D-Draw and Trade-in.[/quote'] I know, but there's somethin' very appealin' in turnin' an abysmal pit of an archetype into a succesful one. Repeated use of apostrophes makes you sound very, very stupid.Claiming that D-Heroes are bad doesn't help you. As an archetype, D-Heroes are bad. They have no real win condition and mediocre synergy. Ask yourself why they are used exclusively in small engines and never in a dedicated D-Hero deck.That's still a purpose. It may not focus on them, but it still makes them good. Of course, half of the D-Heroes are crap, and only 1/10 are good draw engines. ...which means that, as an archetype, they are terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Well the D-Hero deck was so good they had to ban/limit the whole win condition of the deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Well the D-Hero deck was so good they had to ban/limit the whole win condition of the deck. No. They had to ban the central card of a Monarch deck that included two or three D-Heroes. Decks that actually used the archetype, rather than three cards from the archetype, have always been terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Well the D-Hero deck was so good they had to ban/limit the whole win condition of the deck.The D Hero theme itself sucked, but certain cards(D Draw, Malicious. etc..) are good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Correct me if I'm wrong but there was that deck that nearly won costa mesa... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Correct me if I'm wrong but there was that deck that nearly won costa mesa...And that decks name is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 They would be worse as Synchros. They are very good targets for Allure' date=' D-Draw and Trade-in.[/quote'] I know, but there's somethin' very appealin' in turnin' an abysmal pit of an archetype into a succesful one. Repeated use of apostrophes makes you sound very, very stupid.Claiming that D-Heroes are bad doesn't help you. As an archetype, D-Heroes are bad. They have no real win condition and mediocre synergy. Ask yourself why they are used exclusively in small engines and never in a dedicated D-Hero deck.That's still a purpose. It may not focus on them, but it still makes them good. Of course, half of the D-Heroes are crap, and only 1/10 are good draw engines. ...which means that, as an archetype, they are terrible.Every archetype has terrible cards in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 They would be worse as Synchros. They are very good targets for Allure' date=' D-Draw and Trade-in.[/quote'] I know, but there's somethin' very appealin' in turnin' an abysmal pit of an archetype into a succesful one. Repeated use of apostrophes makes you sound very, very stupid.Claiming that D-Heroes are bad doesn't help you. I am The Will, and I love usin' apostrophes, even to the point of perdition. And, yes, I know I'm not helpin' mine self, but then again, I only moan and gripe and jabroni about what could have been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 They would be worse as Synchros. They are very good targets for Allure' date=' D-Draw and Trade-in.[/quote'] I know, but there's somethin' very appealin' in turnin' an abysmal pit of an archetype into a succesful one. Repeated use of apostrophes makes you sound very, very stupid.Claiming that D-Heroes are bad doesn't help you. As an archetype, D-Heroes are bad. They have no real win condition and mediocre synergy. Ask yourself why they are used exclusively in small engines and never in a dedicated D-Hero deck.That's still a purpose. It may not focus on them, but it still makes them good. Of course, half of the D-Heroes are crap, and only 1/10 are good draw engines. ...which means that, as an archetype, they are terrible.Every archetype has terrible cards in it. Not every archetype is so bad that it can't be used as an archetype, but must simply have parts of it used as a splashable engine. Look at Six Samurai. Sure, it has stuff like Yariza, but decks that use it run Zanji, Irou, Yaichi, Grandmaster, Shien, Enishi, Hand, Spirit, and Double-Edged. Then look at D-Heroes. The decks that use them never run more than four cards from the theme, perhaps five if Stratos is included. The difference is that one is a strong archetype, and the other is a weak archetype with a few splashable cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.