Azuh Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 [align=center] As we all know, these are pretty good cards. But do they deserve to be limited? Discuss[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Romancer wants them banned. Romancer also wants Granmarg and Zaborg to go to 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted January 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Romancer wants them banned. Romancer also wants Granmarg and Zaborg to go to 1. Romancer is gay and should learn to play the game more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Romancer? wut? + laughs in epic fashion + Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 I think he also banned Instant Fusion and brought back TER. I could be misremembering, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Generic Removal is bad for the game apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Generic Removal is bad for the game apparently. According to that Romancer guy anyway. But Limiting 2 of the worst Monarchs in the game and bringing back TER. Oh God. *UBER FACEPALM* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 I don't see Granmarg being Limited anytime soon. MAYBE Zaborg. As for these 2 Spells...Personally, I think Smashing Ground is the better of the two. I wouldn't mind if Smashing was banned and Fissure was Semi-Limited. I wouldn't mind it if just Fissure was Semi-Limited with Smashing staying Limited. I DO see Smashing Ground being Limited or Banned, and Fissure being Limited or Semi-Limited. However, I do not either of them at 3. That was a nightmare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 I don't see Granmarg being Limited anytime soon. MAYBE Zaborg. As for these 2 Spells...Personally' date=' I think Smashing Ground is the better of the two. I wouldn't mind if Smashing was banned and Fissure was Semi-Limited. I wouldn't mind it if just Fissure was Semi-Limited with Smashing staying Limited. I DO see Smashing Ground being Limited or Banned, and Fissure being Limited or Semi-Limited. However, I do not either of them at 3. That was a nightmare.[/quote'] Having Chaos Sorcerer at 3 was a nightmare if you weren't using a Chaos Deck. None of the Monarchs need to be anywhere on a good ban list. They are all balanced out because they have to all be Tribute Summoned otherwise they are merely 2400 ATK beatsticks (with the exception of Kuraz whose effect can be set off when it is both Normal or Special Summoned. The fact Kuraz can't attack is what balances it). Personally I see no problem whatsoever with Fissure and Smashing Ground at 3. The real problem lies in other banworthy cards. Monster Reborn, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 good cards but i really wouldnt liek to see theese cards at 3 again games woudl be soo bloody boring Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curium Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 good cards but i really wouldnt liek to see theese cards at 3 again games woudl be soo bloody boring Soul Taker is at 3.Hammer Shot is at 3.I don't see the game being boring, no one even runs them, why would they go main 3 Fissure and 3 Smashing Ground and cause the game to be "boring" if they aren't maining Soul Taker and Hammer shots which are also 1 for 1? Also, unlike when these were unrestricted, Stardust exists now. Destruction effects are easily shut down, and spin is more preferred to counter synchros anyway. Though being non-targetting saves them from Thought Ruler and Tytannial, which is nice. If we are talking about the current meta, DADs are basically 3 Fissures/Smashing Ground in 1 card that can destroy S/T too. These cards just cannot match the boss cards like JD or Gyzarus. I believe that they can go to 3 per deck. Destruction effects are so common now that 1 for 1 is not overpowered at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Soul Taker, Hammer Shot, Lightning Vortex(a little better)=these Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Decent cards that got unfairly limited just to cur the deadly... Gadget Deck? <_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Decent cards that got unfairly limited just to cur the deadly... Gadget Deck? <_<That's about the only place you'll see these two together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.