~Kefka~ Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Recently i realized that i didn't have alot of good cards on me, all i have in the way of a good deck is my crystal beasts and that's it, so a couple nights ago i threw this baby together! it has not signifgance but to annoy my opponents and make them deck out hopefully. Monsters: sasuke samurai x1nanobreaker x2mask of darkness x1gyroid x3patroid x1chiron the mage x2robotic knight x1mataza the zapper x1Card ejector x1sabersaurus x1gaurdian sphinx x2wall of illusion x3old vindictive magician x2submarineroid x2 Spells:dark snake syndrome x2MST x1scapegoat x1book of moon x1messenger of the peace x2smashing ground x1stray lambs x1final countdown x1level limit area A x2nobleman of crossout x1heavy storm x1swords x1rush recklessly x3giant trunade x1lightning vortex x1fissure x1creature swap x1kaiser colosseum x3 Traps: CED x3sakurestsu armor x3threatning roar x3thunder of ruler x3michizure x1enchanted javelin x3wall of reviealing light x2fairy box (my personal fav) x1waboku x1magic jammer x1seven tools x1negate attack x3draining sheild x3bottomless trap hole x1trap hole x1 like i said before, this deck has no meaning but to annoy, and i took out monster reborn, premature burial and call of the haunted, because i can't keep track of wether they are banned or not, so screw those 3! ps- don't be afraid to say my deck sucks, i know this in advance, and if there is any changes in the banned of limited list, i give up! XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 This deck is annoying to look at so I guess it serves its purpose. And that doesnt distract from the fact it sucks and LOL at Level Limit Area - A being a Spell Card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbdnate Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 This deck is annoying to look at so I guess it serves its purpose. And that doesnt distract from the fact it sucks and LOL at Level Limit Area - A being a Spell Card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Kefka~ Posted February 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2009 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted February 4, 2009 Report Share Posted February 4, 2009 the only thing annoying about this deck is finding out that clicking this thread has led me to reading halfway through a deck that I see no point i attempting to fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodius Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 The only annoying thing about this deck is how bad it sucks. Learn2YGOZ!!! peeps. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logmon1 Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 This deck is annoying to look at so I guess it serves its purpose. And that doesnt distract from the fact it sucks and LOL at Level Limit Area - A being a Spell Card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zenrais Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 1/10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemniscate Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 Try something more like this.Use a card, then creature swap it to get a better card.Or Book of Moon an enemy card.And Divine Wrath for anti-meta/ disruption.Cats for Trap search.Masks for Trap revivalMataza for easily searchable x2 direct attacker (plenty of monster destruction)Gorz for recovering advantage after Heavy/ someother mass destruction card.Not terribly fast, but it doesn't need to be. It is more of a Toolbox. Monsters: 152 Mask of Darkness3 Cat of Ill Omen3 Mataza the Zapper 1 Gorz3 Rose, Warrior of Revenge3 Marauding Captain Spells: 161 MST 1 Scapegoat 2 Book of Moon 1 Smashing Ground 1 Heavy Storm 1 Giant Trunade 1 Fissure 3 Creature Swap 1 Brain Control3 Reinforcement of the Army Traps: 93 Solemn Judgment3 Threatening Roar3 Divine Wrath Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 Traps: CED x3 Your right' date=' This deck [i']IS[/i] annoying. Considering your using Chaos Emperor Dragon as a Trap card. And at 3 copies is REAL pro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Kefka~ Posted February 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 CED stands for compulsary evacuation device Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemniscate Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 CED stands for compulsary evacuation device The shortened version of Compulsory Evacuation Device is "Compulsory" not "CED" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Kefka~ Posted February 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 ah, sry i'm not fimilar with all the shorting terms yet, i am still new Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemniscate Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 There is a thread in the Your Deck section with all of the name shortenings, you should check it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Kefka~ Posted February 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 i see what u mean, i have Compulsory x3 may take some getting used to, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 0 solemns in "ANNOYING DECK" is fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbdnate Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 0 solemns in "ANNOYING DECK" is fail you fail right along with the TC for not realizing that not every deck needs solemns... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 0 solemns in "ANNOYING DECK" is fail you fail right along with the TC for not realizing that not every deck needs solemns... Solemns aren't for every deck but the control they provide fit in with "Annoying" theme... Also, solemn is better most of the Traps this person is using anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbdnate Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 i was just pointing out that your logic of "0 solemn=bad" failed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 i was just pointing out that your logic of "0 solemn=bad" failed... 0 solemns isnt bad but solemns should be ran in 3s sometimes 2 but solemn is the best tech ever and I would run it over most of the other junk.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbdnate Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 perhaps... but what you said earlier was that no solemns=fail... i could very easily give you two other examples where solemn isnt used... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 most FTK and OTK builds have no need for solemn... but, I believe solemn = 3 or nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbdnate Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 i can very easily give you a meta deck with no solemns... one that won a sjc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 i can very easily give you a meta deck with no solemns... one that won a sjc... Also LS doesnt run Solemn and Su's build doesnt run solemns Is it one of those? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbdnate Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 yup...... this is getting no where... all i was doing is correcting your mistake of saying that all decks need solemn... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.