Sid. Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Looks fantastic, and if its near the same time as Cod4 was placed in, then i have a feeling it'll be in the top 10 best games of all time... The trailer, however, made me confuzzled. Anyone have any thoughts or explanations on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 I prefer to call it just Modern Warfare 2, since the official title didn't say COD6 like COD4: Modern Warfare did. And I'm unsure on the thoughts. The trailer didn't reveal enough yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid. Posted May 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 But it is the 6th Call of Duty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 No noob. It's not a CoD game anymore. Modern Warfare is it's own franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 I don't think Infinity Ward will be making anymore COD games set in WWII anymore. It'll all be modern. Ok maybe really futuristic too, but we'll know that when the 3rd one comes out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid. Posted May 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Whoah, it is a new franchise... Huh. Ok then, Modern Warefare 2 it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Look if they put COD6 before Modern Warfare 2 (like they did COD4 for Modern Warfare) I'll take it back, but not until then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 They announced that MW is a new franchise idiots. I don't think Infinity Ward will be making anymore COD games set in WWII anymore. It'll all be modern. Ok maybe really futuristic too' date=' but we'll know that when the 3rd one comes out.[/quote'] Infinity Ward is taking MW while Tryarch can take CoD and spoil it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 I gave Tryarch credit for World At War, but I don't expect them to make two or more COD games in WWII (no more ideas left) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid. Posted May 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Cold war? Vietnam war? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 rumors about the vet and cold war are surfacing everywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 Cold war? Vietnam war? Well those aren't as popular, and personally you can only BS past warfare so much before the audience has enough of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A●O●J Posted May 17, 2009 Report Share Posted May 17, 2009 They better not make it have zombies like in COD:WOW. It will just kill the realism. I think the story will have a more Espionage feel, based on the feeling I got from the trailer. I was annoyed with the trailer. It didn't tell us anything new at all. We already knew a sequel would be made, simply confirming the release doesn't make us happy IW :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 Personally I hope it's not ALL espionage. In Modern Warfare, that stealth mission you play as Captain Price was certainly among the levels I didn't like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid. Posted May 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 WHAT?!THAT WAS MY FAVORITE LEVEL!In all seriousness, everyone has different views. I cant blame ya, i like espionage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 Sorry, I prefer the guns blazing tactic, but that doesn't work on the espionage level once you turn the difficulty to hardened Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Man0waR Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 improvments. SP- 1- less 'nade spamming' enemies2- improved AI on Veteran. (it seems tough enough, but I want more.)3- more vehicle missions.4- some terrorist gameplay would be sick5- more organizations to play as (Spetsnaz, GIGN, GSG9) just to keep the special forces theme.6- more guns, it seemed to lack customizabilty for weps in SP7- None of the 'the leader has to die at the end' moments. I sheet my pants when the main guy that is with you the whole games dies. Why do games do that?8- EASTER EGGS THAT ARENT sheet!! MP- 1-Less "noob perks"2- no P-90 or a less "noobified" P-903- Customizable characters (like Rainbow six vegas)4- Vehicles (like WaW)5- a WW2 mode? (with WW2 guns?)6- MINIGUN!7- BOTS!! For noobs without XBlive.8- XBlive Coop.9- MAP EDITOR!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 oh what do you have against grenade spamming AI? If anything they should also take away the grenade indicator to make it more realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Man0waR Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 ^ but if you havent any infinite nade spamming' AI with no indicator, you'd die like 30 times a minute. The game would suck cuz all you'd be doing was running from grenades that you know you can't avoid. So STFU. If u take out the indicator, the game is funked. And only a complete douche would allow it to bother them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 Please, it's not like I want the indicator taken out without reducing the grenade AI at all. Personally I wish they'd take out the dogs. They are better enemies than the regular soldiers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Man0waR Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 ^ yeah...I hate the dogs. The make like a rhythm game out of it. Sure, I mean of course an enemy outpost WILL have dogs on it, but not through a bombed out city where dogs aren't needed because everything blew up anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 yeah, unless you go something extreme and attach explosive charges to the dogs as a mobile demolition charge Now THAT would be entertaining to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Man0waR Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 ^ definately. Removing the ENDLESS WAVES OF EMEMiES ThAt WONT STOP UNTIL YOU PASS THIS WALL! Would help balance the gameplay even more. Just have the AI get reinforcements if they are too outmatched. And some more squad based would be cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 Yeah that was annoying to me because it left me barely enough ammo for my good weapons to complete the rest of the mission. If anything the enemy AI should have better weapons so when I kill them I can throw away mine once ammo is out, rather than rely on the crap AK74 or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Man0waR Posted May 18, 2009 Report Share Posted May 18, 2009 or give em all RPG-10s on Eay =p lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.