Force_Flex Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 [align=center]Discuss if this card is useful. Or just dumb. [/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Its meh. Only good for fire-burn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinitus Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 a couple lucky turns, and this card could do some damage. Plus, little small cards, especially an unnoticed and old card such as this, can really tick someone off. Which makes for fun play, and with some good attack reflects, like negate attack and Draining shield, could do some annoying, effective, and funny damage. But I wouldn't use it. Because you'd have to get pretty lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Force_Flex Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 This is probably going to sound wicked nooby, but, wouldn't swords of reviling light work? I mean, that's 4400 damage and 3100 ATK.This is probably going to sound wicked nooby, but, wouldn't swords of reviling light work? I mean, that's 4400 damage and 3100 ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinitus Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 True, but that doesn't stop them from NEGATING the attacks, that's why I said you need to be lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 It sucks. By the time this can cause significant damage it would be long gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinitus Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 That's why I said you'd have to get lucky. Hope your opponent has a sucky few hands, perhaps a heavy storm here and there to prevent spell and trap usage, but other than that you might as well put it under your wobbly chairs and your cold drinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlickimenT Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 I just got that card today!Hook er' up with a mist body, and yes.you can just keep attacking and owning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 It doesnt need to inflict damage, it just need to attack directly, so you can equip it with TSoFL-Tryce, and attack twice per turn. After the first turn it attack will be 1600 if I'm not wrong, and the damage you inflict would be 600 that turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 This card is good burn, but ATK sucks. You'd need to play some protection cards, like SORL and Rod of Silence to stop spells. I'd use this combo but too much to work with. So not worth it, but ATK raise is nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 This card is good burn' date=' [b']but ATK sucks[/b]. You'd need to play some protection cards, like SORL and Rod of Silence to stop spells. I'd use this combo but too much to work with. So not worth it, but ATK raise is nice FAIL. You need to lrn2proofread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metalflygon08 Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 I want to see a Deck built around this lil' guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueEyesShiningDragon4Z Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 5 sucesful attacks at most and you winthis + mist body and a couple face down protection would really piss some one ofive made great use of this card in a fire removal deck back before macro was outbut im kinda sick of people saying it looks like me though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Incognito:. Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 let it survive until the 2nd attack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Just kill it once it attacks for the first time.Or, let it build its attack and then B-Con it XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metalflygon08 Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Or LiEk totaL1y use MaGicaL SilinDer WhEn it"s ATK is Reel Up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Or LiEk totaL1y use MaGicaL SilinDer WhEn it"s ATK is Reel Up! Magic Cylinder for teh lulz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 It's a LOLATK card that is screwed if you can't get at least 2 attacks in first....No. Next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Frostpaw Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Combo with gravity bind/area B and this card is way better. I might actually try to build a deck around this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Too Slow. [/end of discussion] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 This card is good burn' date=' [b']but ATK sucks[/b]. You'd need to play some protection cards, like SORL and Rod of Silence to stop spells. I'd use this combo but too much to work with. So not worth it, but ATK raise is nice FAIL. You need to lrn2proofread. Do stop quoting my responses, I mean what I said: ATK is sucky for LV3, but good direct attack + attack bonus :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.