Xing Posted July 1, 2009 Report Share Posted July 1, 2009 J-Max/JD's tut you lazy bums. That takes up to much time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted July 2, 2009 Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 J-Max/JD's tut you lazy bums. That takes up to much time. Big deal. The card maker never was supposed to support custom subtypes anyways. That's why there is no option to that. The cardmaker already has all the subtypes from the game. If you really want to make custom subtypes, work for it (type, whatever). It's not that hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted July 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 It gets annoying when you have to repeatedly do that, it does take up too much time IMO, and fixing this wouldn't take too much time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neutrality Man Posted July 2, 2009 Report Share Posted July 2, 2009 Solution A:http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-98728-post-1694346.html#pid1694346Solution B:My Graphic design TUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juuzou Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 i liek marshmellows support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 I think its a good idea. Sure, there are other ways to do it, but by that same value, there are other ways to make an entire card >_>I could make my card entirely in photoshop, but thats a pain in the ass. Thus, I use the card maker. Same principle. Plus, if this site were 100% about realism, it wouldn't have the Pop culture and Other subforums. I support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H3SE Posted July 3, 2009 Report Share Posted July 3, 2009 I can see why you would want the ability to make a user-friendly sub-type creator, but have you ever considered that YCMaker has already overhauled the Card Creator code at least 3 times. Doing this would mean a TON of code working and a complete remodeling of the card maker. BTW I do not support... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 I can see why you would want the ability to make a user-friendly sub-type creator' date=' but have you ever considered that YCMaker has already overhauled the Card Creator code at least 3 times. Doing this would mean [b']a TON of code working and a complete remodeling of the card maker.[/b] BTW I do not support... No, it wouldn't. And have you considered how much money YCMaker makes off of this site? He owes us a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 I can see why you would want the ability to make a user-friendly sub-type creator' date=' but have you ever considered that YCMaker has already overhauled the Card Creator code at least 3 times. Doing this would mean [b']a TON of code working and a complete remodeling of the card maker.[/b] BTW I do not support... No, it wouldn't. And have you considered how much money YCMaker makes off of this site? He owes us a bit. .....And I doubt it would really effect the whole thing anyway.For the pull down tab of the subtypes, YCMaker could just add an option called "blank". where it keeps it as an Effect monster, but allows for origionality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 I just noticed an annoying thing while creating a new card. If you plan on creating a sub-type that doesn't already exist on an effect monster you get: "*type* / *new sub-type* / Effect" which cripples the overall realism in the card. I suggest that there be a new option while selecting what kind of monster card you want to make. Sub-Type X. It makes your card Orange like an effect' date=' but the effect part isn't added. Instead, a bar below has an area to write in what you want to go in that spot instead of effect. So, before: [Warrior / Marshmallow / Effect'] After: [Warrior / Marshmallow] Just a little suggestion that'd make these cards more realistic. Supporters(17):Synchro DuelistObsidianAOJJGjk233_ultimatemasterCardinalDemon Xanbumanmiragesaturn paladinjjackv2max cforce flexMystery GuestLuxordDark Armed XingOne Word No point. Read J-Max's Custom Subtype Tutorial, it's really easy to understand. No support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 No support.Some of you people need to stop being lazy, cause that's mah job >=OEven though YCMaker owes us because he makes money of this site, while he probably sits on his ass watching some TV, doing this wouldn't do much for the site would it now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted July 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I really don't see how an alternative method that is much slower and tedious invalidates the addition of a new system that will benefit many. As OMG said, there are different ways to do everything on the card maker. And I still find the whole "too unrealistic" argument laughable. You're allowed to create whatever type you want, but not sub-type?… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lost Soul Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 i support (even though it is confussing,lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazerrick Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 You get my supportage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuimicVital Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 i support this but i already know how to make sub types it is not necessary,anyway i support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I support this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackwing-Master Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 i support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ƬЦЯBӨƧƧ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I support it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Lol noyou can do that with the internet in 2 seconds nope no supportwoudint make a diffrence because you can do that with the internet NO SUPPORT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I support this because pretty much any other method would be quite tedious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilikesharks2020 Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I support it. I would really like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 You have it alreadyYCMaker woudint even waste his time to do this cos to do this you don't need paint GIMP or PhotoShopso he wont do it even if you had 10000000 supporters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkForce™ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 SUPPORTED~DarkForce™ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted July 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2009 You have it alreadyYCMaker woudint even waste his time to do this cos to do this you don't need paint GIMP or PhotoShopso he wont do it even if you had 10000000 supporters Thanks for posting arguments that have already been counter-acted. Twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.