[DISC]Monster Reborn

[-Lightray Daedalus-]

If this card is banned...would the game be left without generic..reborn cards..or should..say Call of the Haunted make a come back?

So which is less banable...

MR' date='PB or CotH?

[/quote']

 

Why do you think we should have generic revival AT ALL?

 

Because they are needed....

Without at least 1 of them only deck types that have specific support can use this kind of effect...same goes for all the specific support.

and since

Specific Support = PLaying with only supported Arche/types = Less Variety = More Script Game = Less Skills

[Xing]

It's stupid.

 

If things like Call of the Haunted are banned, why isn't this? It's BETTER than them.

[Kyosuke Kiryu]

Call of the Haunted is chainable.

 

If your Opponent uses MR, chain Call to get their monster, providing that its in your graveyard.

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

That's why Call of the Haunted was banned.

 

Anyway, this card just got unbanned and it should stay at 1 IMO.

[SkillzKill]

Premature Burial > Monster Reborn > Call of the Haunted

 

 

All 3 should be banned.

 

Fixed.

[Charizard]

Classic, Epic, Staple.

[Xazeon]

Bannable, etc. Why are we discussing a staple that doesn't need to be discussed?

[borntorun112]

That's what the game is about. Having a card like Monster Reborn in your deck, and then hopefully drawing it at the right time so you can turn the duel around. Personally, I think that it makes the game more fun, with all the possibilities it could create. Now should it be banned? Probably, but if it's not, that's fine with me.

[SkillzKill]

That's what the game is about. Having a card like Monster Reborn in your deck' date=' and then [b']hopefully drawing it at the right time so you can turn the duel around[/b]. Personally, I think that it makes the game more fun, with all the possibilities it could create. Now should it be banned? Probably, but if it's not, that's fine with me.

 

That's why it should be banned. Lucksack is bad for the game since it promotes unskilled play. Yes, the game will usually depend on luck, however, we want the game to be less rewarding of luck as possible, and that means banning of cards that can turn the duel around when drawn, or cards that require no skill to use.

[Crow™]

Staple card should stay @1. Call is fine being banned.

[borntorun112]

That's what the game is about. Having a card like Monster Reborn in your deck' date=' and then [b']hopefully drawing it at the right time so you can turn the duel around[/b]. Personally, I think that it makes the game more fun, with all the possibilities it could create. Now should it be banned? Probably, but if it's not, that's fine with me.

 

That's why it should be banned. Lucksack is bad for the game since it promotes unskilled play. Yes, the game will usually depend on luck, however, we want the game to be less rewarding of luck as possible, and that means banning of cards that can turn the duel around when drawn, or cards that require no skill to use.

 

The only thing is that every single strategy depends on luck...... and that luck is called drawing it.

[HORUS]

Epic card is epic' date=' though I have no idea what in the world the pic is supposed to be =/

[/quote']

 

It was originally an ankh, the ancient Egyptian hieroglyph that reads "eternal life", and whoever makes sure the cards are safe for little kids thought it was necessary to remove that symbol and replace it with some retarded bird sword, despite the fact that no 6 year old is going to know what it is. People my age (I'm 17) don't even know what it is and most of them have never seen it.

[Kira the Savior]

That's what the game is about. Having a card like Monster Reborn in your deck' date=' and then [b']hopefully drawing it at the right time so you can turn the duel around[/b]. Personally, I think that it makes the game more fun, with all the possibilities it could create. Now should it be banned? Probably, but if it's not, that's fine with me.

 

That's why it should be banned. Lucksack is bad for the game since it promotes unskilled play. Yes, the game will usually depend on luck, however, we want the game to be less rewarding of luck as possible, and that means banning of cards that can turn the duel around when drawn, or cards that require no skill to use.

 

The only thing is that every single strategy depends on luck...... and that luck is called drawing it.

 

Allure, Card Destruction, Hand Destruction, Dark Word Dealings, Trade-In all say no its not luck

[ihop]

I think neither PB, call of the haunted or this should be banned. I think they should all be limited, because some card rely on being Special Summoned from the Graveyard i.e. Darkblaze Dragon.

[Manjoume Thunder]

I think neither PB' date=' call of the haunted or this should be banned. I think they should all be limited, because some card rely on being Special Summoned from the Graveyard i.e. Darkblaze Dragon.

[/quote']

 

This post describes YCM :D

[borntorun112]

That's what the game is about. Having a card like Monster Reborn in your deck' date=' and then [b']hopefully drawing it at the right time so you can turn the duel around[/b]. Personally, I think that it makes the game more fun, with all the possibilities it could create. Now should it be banned? Probably, but if it's not, that's fine with me.

 

That's why it should be banned. Lucksack is bad for the game since it promotes unskilled play. Yes, the game will usually depend on luck, however, we want the game to be less rewarding of luck as possible, and that means banning of cards that can turn the duel around when drawn, or cards that require no skill to use.

 

The only thing is that every single strategy depends on luck...... and that luck is called drawing it.

 

Allure, Card Destruction, Hand Destruction, Dark Word Dealings, Trade-In all say no its not luck

 

All those cards in some way let you draw more cards. That is still luck, because there's something called placement of the cards within the deck.

[SUPERYUGI!GO!!]

it shouldn't be banned. have any of you ever play a macro deck beforE? against them its basically a dead draw. or if you draw it early game, you might as well discard it with dark world dealings or hand destruction because there nothing in tha graveyard ya

[Tickle Me Emo]

it shouldn't be banned. have any of you ever play a macro deck beforE? against them its basically a dead draw. or if you draw it early game' date=' you might as well discard it with dark world dealings or hand destruction because there nothing in tha graveyard ya

[/quote']

 

the fact that a very rare to find deck type can counter a card doesnt make it any less broken.

[SkillzKill]

That's what the game is about. Having a card like Monster Reborn in your deck' date=' and then [b']hopefully drawing it at the right time so you can turn the duel around[/b]. Personally, I think that it makes the game more fun, with all the possibilities it could create. Now should it be banned? Probably, but if it's not, that's fine with me.

 

That's why it should be banned. Lucksack is bad for the game since it promotes unskilled play. Yes, the game will usually depend on luck, however, we want the game to be less rewarding of luck as possible, and that means banning of cards that can turn the duel around when drawn, or cards that require no skill to use.

 

The only thing is that every single strategy depends on luck...... and that luck is called drawing it.

 

Allure, Card Destruction, Hand Destruction, Dark Word Dealings, Trade-In all say no its not luck

 

All those cards in some way let you draw more cards. That is still luck, because there's something called placement of the cards within the deck.

 

Read my original post again. I said the game needs to be least rewarding of luck as possible. Therefore the banning of cards that when top decked, is able to turn the game around.

[borntorun112]

That's what the game is about. Having a card like Monster Reborn in your deck' date=' and then [b']hopefully drawing it at the right time so you can turn the duel around[/b]. Personally, I think that it makes the game more fun, with all the possibilities it could create. Now should it be banned? Probably, but if it's not, that's fine with me.

 

That's why it should be banned. Lucksack is bad for the game since it promotes unskilled play. Yes, the game will usually depend on luck, however, we want the game to be less rewarding of luck as possible, and that means banning of cards that can turn the duel around when drawn, or cards that require no skill to use.

 

The only thing is that every single strategy depends on luck...... and that luck is called drawing it.

 

Allure, Card Destruction, Hand Destruction, Dark Word Dealings, Trade-In all say no its not luck

 

All those cards in some way let you draw more cards. That is still luck, because there's something called placement of the cards within the deck.

 

Read my original post again. I said the game needs to be least rewarding of luck as possible. Therefore the banning of cards that when top decked, is able to turn the game around.

 

Ok. I just like the idea of a turning point. Now that this is not banned, it's something needed to be dealt with by a duelist, and now you just need another strategy. I think it opens up a new area in the game.

[SkillzKill]

That's what the game is about. Having a card like Monster Reborn in your deck' date=' and then [b']hopefully drawing it at the right time so you can turn the duel around[/b]. Personally, I think that it makes the game more fun, with all the possibilities it could create. Now should it be banned? Probably, but if it's not, that's fine with me.

 

That's why it should be banned. Lucksack is bad for the game since it promotes unskilled play. Yes, the game will usually depend on luck, however, we want the game to be less rewarding of luck as possible, and that means banning of cards that can turn the duel around when drawn, or cards that require no skill to use.

 

The only thing is that every single strategy depends on luck...... and that luck is called drawing it.

 

Allure, Card Destruction, Hand Destruction, Dark Word Dealings, Trade-In all say no its not luck

 

All those cards in some way let you draw more cards. That is still luck, because there's something called placement of the cards within the deck.

 

Read my original post again. I said the game needs to be least rewarding of luck as possible. Therefore the banning of cards that when top decked, is able to turn the game around.

 

Ok. I just like the idea of a turning point. Now that this is not banned, it's something needed to be dealt with by a duelist, and now you just need another strategy. I think it opens up a new area in the game.

 

However, this usually means that the top decking player is actually a terrible one and relies on luck to win. The game needs to be based more on skill and less on luck.

[borntorun112]

However' date=' this usually means that the top decking player is actually a terrible one and relies on luck to win. The game needs to be based more on skill and less on luck.

[/quote']

 

Yes, but the un-banning of Monster Reborn opens up new strategies, seeing as good duelists must now think of ways to work around an opponent turning the game by using Monster Reborn.

[GenzoTheHarpist]

However' date=' this usually means that the top decking player is actually a terrible one and relies on luck to win. The game needs to be based more on skill and less on luck.

[/quote']

 

Yes, but the un-banning of Monster Reborn opens up new strategies, seeing as good duelists must now think of ways to work around an opponent turning the game by using Monster Reborn.

 

I don't see why we should even allow a card that would give a unskilled player a disproportional chance of winning. Good players shouldn't have to do that.

[borntorun112]

However' date=' this usually means that the top decking player is actually a terrible one and relies on luck to win. The game needs to be based more on skill and less on luck.

[/quote']

 

Yes, but the un-banning of Monster Reborn opens up new strategies, seeing as good duelists must now think of ways to work around an opponent turning the game by using Monster Reborn.

 

I don't see why we should even allow a card that would give a unskilled player a disproportional chance of winning. Good players shouldn't have to do that.

 

The only thing is that it's not like it's only allowed to be in an unskilled player's deck. Both players in a duel can have this in their deck.

[SkillzKill]

However' date=' this usually means that the top decking player is actually a terrible one and relies on luck to win. The game needs to be based more on skill and less on luck.

[/quote']

 

Yes, but the un-banning of Monster Reborn opens up new strategies, seeing as good duelists must now think of ways to work around an opponent turning the game by using Monster Reborn.

 

I don't see why we should even allow a card that would give a unskilled player a disproportional chance of winning. Good players shouldn't have to do that.

 

The only thing is that it's not like it's only allowed to be in an unskilled player's deck. Both players in a duel can have this in their deck.

 

With that logic, we can bring back Pot of Greed, Delinquent Duo, Graceful Charity, Raigeki, Harpie's Feather Duster, and now everyone can have these cards in their deck.