Eury Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 I have the Limited Edition of this card <3. Anyway, where do you guys think this card would best belong in the current Meta? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 its a Heavy Storm on legs aswell as Trade-in food Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 Three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted September 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Three.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I have the Limited Edition of this cardWell I haz teh origionl Flaming Eternity verson <3 Three.^Tea.Leaf says that the meta should run Sacred Phoenix and/or it isnt limt worthy^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted September 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I have the Limited Edition of this cardWell I haz teh origionl Flaming Eternity verson <3 Three.^Tea.Leaf says that the meta should run Sacred Phoenix and/or it isnt limt worthy^Ah, okay. Why is it limited in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I have the Limited Edition of this cardWell I haz teh origionl Flaming Eternity verson <3 Three.^Tea.Leaf says that the meta should run Sacred Phoenix and/or it isnt limt worthy^Ah' date=' okay. Why is it limited in the first place?[/quote'] Its because when Konami releases a card, they usually think it's effect is rediculous and it ends up limited/banned. But after a while, Konami realized that it doesnt harm the game in any real way(real way?)Kinda' like Breaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 This + Yubel, Terror Incarnate = profit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 ....Since When is Sacred Phoenix Limited? Cool, but Waaaay past it's prime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Winged Beast = Blackwings? This infamously works with Yubel - Terror Incarnate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Shocker Android Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Used to be a staple in Soul Control. Unfortunately now everything removes from play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I don't care what any of you say - a deck revolving around this and Terror Incarnate doesn't work. End of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 This + Goka' date=' the Pyre of Malice[/b'] = profit Fixed. Have Phoenix out, SS Goka, destroy Phoenix. Next turn, you have Goka, a Token, and Phoenix back with complete S/T Destruction. I built a deck around this combo. Faired pretty well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I don't care what any of you say - a deck revolving around this and Terror Incarnate doesn't work. End of story. Lolycm. That's only because you're obsessed with that evil she-male thingy from GX Dub. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I don't care what any of you say - a deck revolving around this and Terror Incarnate doesn't work. End of story. Lolycm. That's only because you're obsessed with that evil she-male thingy from GX Dub. 1) I find it funny how some people on YCM don't know how to properly lolYCM someone.2) It's more of a fetish than an obsession, really.3) How is me liking Yubel relate to TerrorPhoenix working well? Your post makes no sense. You lolYCM'd me, then re-affirmed my statement, and put your reasoning as "you love Yubel". Seriously, lrn2englishlanguage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Meh... Looking for a sharpened pencil, I found my original FET UR of this card.But it isn't even a problem, or would be anytime soon; me thinks.. So yeah... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I don't care what any of you say - a deck revolving around this and Terror Incarnate doesn't work. End of story. Lolycm. That's only because you're obsessed with that evil she-male thingy from GX Dub. 1) I find it funny how some people on YCM don't know how to properly lolYCM someone. Really? That Lolycm was for you openly not realising that Terror and Phoenix have a combo.2) It's more of a fetish than an obsession' date=' really. [b']I kinda guessed that.[/b]3) How is me liking Yubel relate to TerrorPhoenix working well? Your post makes no sense. You lolYCM'd me, then re-affirmed my statement, and put your reasoning as "you love Yubel". I presumed that you didn't want your Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Lover to hang out with another bird thingy. I mean, we all hate it when our children's card game lover starts making a move on another bird thingy. No one likes that, now do they? Seriously, lrn2englishlanguage. Seriously, learn to read numbnuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Ummm. Generation Shift. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I don't care what any of you say - a deck revolving around this and Terror Incarnate doesn't work. End of story. Lolycm. That's only because you're obsessed with that evil she-male thingy from GX Dub. 1) I find it funny how some people on YCM don't know how to properly lolYCM someone. Really? That Lolycm was for you openly not realising that Terror and Phoenix have a combo.2) It's more of a fetish than an obsession' date=' really. [b']I kinda guessed that.[/b]3) How is me liking Yubel relate to TerrorPhoenix working well? Your post makes no sense. You lolYCM'd me, then re-affirmed my statement, and put your reasoning as "you love Yubel". I presumed that you didn't want your Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Lover to hang out with another bird thingy. I mean, we all hate it when our children's card game lover starts making a move on another bird thingy. No one likes that, now do they? Seriously, lrn2englishlanguage. Seriously, learn to read numbnuts. I fully realize that Terror and Phoenix have a "combo", if you'd like to call it that. My comment was me saying that a deck revolving around said combo is horribly inconsistent and a futile effort, when so many superior Yubel variants exist. And it's not like Yubel is the only monster in my Yubel decks. I'm totally fine with "Yubel having sex with other cards", for a lack of better wording. I don't inject Yubel into every topic I can. Essentially, I'm not Synchrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I fully realize that Terror and Phoenix have a "combo"' date=' if you'd like to call it that. My comment was me saying that a deck revolving around said combo is horribly inconsistent and a futile effort, when so many superior Yubel variants exist. And it's not like Yubel is the only monster in my Yubel decks. I'm totally fine with "Yubel having sex with other cards", for a lack of better wording. I don't inject Yubel into every topic I can. Essentially, I'm not Synchrow.[/quote'] Not to get in on the disagreement, but I never said it was a GOOD combo, just that is was one. I never expected it to be consistent as, well, the deck would operate around something that could EASILY be bottomlessed :/ that an the fact that you have to worry about getting two double tributers out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Gideon. Posted September 2, 2009 Report Share Posted September 2, 2009 I actually made a deck around it.one of my favorite cards in the game Nephthy works well with Yubel terror and Goka the Pyre of malice.She can be summoned easily with Hand of NephthysAlso to make sure she won't be killed easily by an attack, add some molten destructions or anything that increases her attack. IIW is also a good card toprotect Nephthy from chaos sorcerer, Caius, Bottomless, etc btw i have 3 from flaming eternity, 1st edition <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.