iAmNateXero Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Basically' date=' you're willing to get into an argument when you think you have an actual point, but when your sources don't pan out you resort to intellectual cowardice and feeble "beliefs differ" excuses seen from any ignorant buffoon who will come forward with arrogance like "get your facts straight" and yet is unable to bring forth any facts of his own.[/quote'] Eat a dick dude. Your wrong, you wont see that you're wrong, and I don't have the energy to last another retarded fight. I cant find enough evidence right now to prove your wrong, so I'll pm you with the Yearly Interview of Kazuki Takahashi from the January Jump (2010 issue) proving your wrong. So for now, you can be right... but your still wrong. EDIT: I always bring proof, ignorant people just dismiss it. Ie, an interview where he admits to already drawing over 1000 cards, regardless of how old it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Idiot he said he "came up" with 1,000 cards, this includes ALL THE CARDS HE DID IN THE MANGAS, not just ones made into TCG. How you got the impression that related to the card game is bizarre since it is obvious from the text itself he is referring to his work on the manga & anime. Even if this was extrapolated to him doing the artwork for 1,000 TCG cards, the age of the interview would matter, as your claim was that he was still doing the art today. Your ability to prove that is directly proportional to how recent that article is. So when you say you provided proof "regardless of how old it is", you are flat-out wrong. And you saying I was ignorant for dismissing instead proves your own ignorance. You are telling me I am wrong but you even admit you "cant find enough evidence right now to prove" it. So any claim that you proved me wrong has been exposed as nothing but complete hypocrisy as you cannot even get your own story here. Also, you are going to PM me the evidence, supposedly. Even though it is directly related to this thread, you are not going to post it here. I think I know why. You're afraid you'll look even dumber than you did in that thread on stall cards when I dissect whatever illogical extrapolation you try to push next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Idiot he said he "came up" with 1' date='000 cards[/quote'] TIME: Is it hard to come up with unique creatures for the cards' date=' each with their own set of strengths and weaknesses? I heard [b']you've[/b] created something like 700.TAKAHASHI: I stopped counting, but I think it's more like 1,000. And, yeah, it's hard. I'm not sure how many more I've got left in me. But all boys love monsters, and I'm no different, so it's also really fun. What I try to do is fit the creature to the characteristics of the character playing the card. For instance, Kaiba, Yugi's archenemy, is mean and vicious, so his cards tend to be that way, too. So he creates the creatures, but doesn't draw them? They're unique... but he doesn't draw them? The line art from the manga to Card is almost always the same... but he doesn't draw them? ...... He's currently still drawing the 5D's manga series, we're still receiving 5D's cards... but he's... not... drawing... the art?... After he admits to drawing creatures for the main characters? ..................... Do you still not see how much of an R Tard your sounding like? Seriously? EDIT: More proof he drew 5D's, AND OH NOZZZZ, the signature matches the ones on the anniversary cards.[spoiler=Large Image] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 i loled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Idiot he said he "came up" with 1' date='000 cards[/quote'] TIME: Is it hard to come up with unique creatures for the cards' date=' each with their own set of strengths and weaknesses? I heard [b']you've[/b] created something like 700.TAKAHASHI: I stopped counting, but I think it's more like 1,000. And, yeah, it's hard. I'm not sure how many more I've got left in me. But all boys love monsters, and I'm no different, so it's also really fun. What I try to do is fit the creature to the characteristics of the character playing the card. For instance, Kaiba, Yugi's archenemy, is mean and vicious, so his cards tend to be that way, too. So he creates the creatures, but doesn't draw them? They're unique... but he doesn't draw them? The line art from the manga to Card is almost always the same... but he doesn't draw them? ...... He's currently still drawing the 5D's manga series, we're still receiving 5D's cards... but he's... not... drawing... the art?... After he admits to drawing creatures for the main characters? ..................... Do you still not see how much of an R Tard your sounding like? Seriously? EDIT: More proof he drew 5D's, AND OH NOZZZZ, the signature matches the ones on the anniversary cards.[spoiler=Large Image] I already said he drew the manga cards you idiot. You said he drew random TCG cards like infinity dark that never had anything to do with the manga. And yes, he does draw the manga. Yes, everybody knew that. That doesn't really matter though, as you were claiming that even today he draws the vast majority of TCG cards, and there is frankly no evidence for that. Most likely, he draws "special" cards from the manga, lets more obscure cards have their lineart elaborated on by other artists, and just plain isn't involved with TCG cards that don't relate to the manga/anime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Kazuki Takahasi is an amazing artist[/fact] Darkness is crap Zero kicks ass. The art on cards' date=' for the the most, is win.[/quote']^This^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Infinity is a new archetype used by the three main villains of the third arc of Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's, Placido, Jose and Luciano. Main.... villains..... Infinity dark is an Infinity monster..... Not to mention the shocking resemblance and style of absolute zero, who we know was drawn by Kazuki Takahashi..... I swear to god, I feel like Im playing blues clues with Clifford the big retard dog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megatronmaster Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Actually I don't thnik Kazuki did draw Abosolute Zero, The GX manga is drawn by Kageyama Naoyuki, and since he first appeared in the manga id say he drew him. Plus Kazuki doesnt draw all the anime monsters and characters either, the anime crew also have there fair share of artists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Infinity is a new archetype used by the three main villains of the third arc of Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's' date=' Placido, Jose and Luciano. Main.... villains..... Infinity dark is an Infinity monster.....[/quote'] ...It's impossible to be this stupid. You're trolling me. I know it now. But just in case you aren't, this card came out long before 5ds. So no, it is not related to those monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 A cards timing has nothing to do with the artist. But your right, I mean its obvious. Give me some proof. You're good with shutting down my proof, where is yours? Prove Kazuki Takahashi didn't draw Infinity dark. Prove Kazuki Takahashi isn't still drawing card art. You must have some evidence with you somewhere. You have to be drawing conclusions from somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 I'm sorry but it's part of the rules of logic that I don't have to prove a negative. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_proof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 I'm sorry but it's part of the rules of logic that I don't have to prove a negative. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_proof It seems as though Im guilty of Fallacy' date=' but its only after your Argument from ignorance. Me: people will mistakenly take a fallacious argument [b']to provide good reasons to believe its conclusion. An argument can be fallacious whether or not its conclusion is true.[/b] You:The argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam ("appeal to ignorance" [1]), argument by lack of imagination, or negative evidence, is a logical fallacy in which it is claimed that a premise is true only because it has not been proven false, or is false only because it has not been proven true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Except I never claimed that he never drew infinity dark. I just pointed out you had no evidence that he did. I have never put forth any premise of my own, I have merely shown that you have provided stupid arguments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 I swear to god' date=' I feel like Im playing blues clues with Clifford the big retard dog.[/quote'] But thats why its YCM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Nate, you have provided insufficient evidence to proof your statement. You have attempted to push the burden of proof onto the negative, and you have consistently resorted to personal attacks throughout the thread. Certainly, Genzo has done little to prove his case (though again, it isn't actually his responsibility to prove anything.) but you need to calm down, take a step back, reconsider the evidence, and attempt to make a reasonable argument. It is ENTIRELY possible that your are right, but acting this way isn't helping. As for my thoughts, I have no actual evidence to support me on this, but I seem to have the vague impression that Kazuki did the card art for the first couple sets of Yugioh, and then stepped back and focused completely on the Manga. Now, he doesn't even work on the Manga anymore (as has been established by Megatronmonster) and he was never involved in the Anime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 If the title is serious, you are really, really unfortunate. Or "special"...... Absolute Zero kicks ass. Honourary Mr. Freeze pun: 'Ice to see you!' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 -GX mangas aren't drawn by Kazuki, Absolute Zero is a card from the GX manga, connect the evidence. -Infinity is a Gemeni Monster from almost 2 years ago and we all see that its not very often that the 5ds anime uses old cards. ON TOPIC (well, even more on topic):The Gemeni is not that useful, the E-Hero is great, the posing is similar but the art itself not that much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.