D-Hero Plasma

[Eury]

 

Discuss. Just a quick question(sorry if it's a n00bish one), why is he called Bloo-D?

[Mister Sir]

Blood Plasma?

 

Also, his OCG name has Bloo-D in it instead of Plasma, I think.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Here they come, clickity clack down the track

 

Etc etc...

[metalflygon08]

I love how Easy this card is to get, a 5$ tin were I shop and I get Crystal Beast supports and stuff from the tin (still haven't got stupid Tiger, recieved more Pegasus's the tigers)

[KdogPrime]

One of my favorite warriors. In a warrior deck, (Before they re-limited Reinforcement of the Army), I could crack out this card quite easily. He doesn't even need to be in a D-Hero deck to work. That's why I like him so much.

[b0b3rt]

Allure, Trade-In, Control style, etc.

 

Good in a dedicated build

[Thomas★Zero]

Scapegoat makes this appear in a flash.

[Eury]

Scapegoat can't be Tributed though...

[Manjoume Thunder]

Scapegoat can't be Tributed for a tribute summon though...

 

Fix'd

[Toffee.]

Here they come' date=' clickity clack down the track

[b']Its lots and lots of trains![/b]

Get 2 of the best train videos weve ever sold!

You get big trains! Little trains!

Fast trains! Sloooow trains!

Even trains that plow through snow!

*kinda' forgets the rest*

 

God, its such a MetalHyper moment

 

On-Topic: This is why I still play Wc07. His name is "D-Hero Bloo-D"

[Darkest Hour]

In my opinion, Plasma sounds cooler than Bloo-D. Maybe if it was just BlooD or something, sure.

 

or Screaming Bloody Chaos.

[Toffee.]

In my opinion' date=' Plasma sounds cooler than Bloo-D. Maybe if it was just BlooD or something, sure.

 

or Screaming Bloody Chaos.

[/quote']

 

Hey, they could have named it "Blue-D"

[Darkest Hour]

In my opinion' date=' Plasma sounds cooler than Bloo-D. Maybe if it was just BlooD or something, sure.

 

or Screaming Bloody Chaos.

[/quote']

 

Hey, they could have named it "Blue-D"

 

Or just renamed him Destiny Hero Dominion, or Destiny Hero DD

[The Dark One]

Or just left it at Plasma. Which they did.

 

 

 

Anyways, excellent control card. Very well balanced design, but regrettably runs into issue with other not-so-well-balanced-cards like Phantom of Chaos. He's quite versatile due to his being a target to throw out for virtually any draw power you could possibly be running in a deck that would include him. It makes him a much more reliable draw than other high-cost-high-power cards.

 

He still doesn't have any real effect on the meta.

[KdogPrime]

Anyways' date=' excellent control card. Very well balanced design, but regrettably runs into issue with other not-so-well-balanced-cards like Phantom of Chaos. He's quite versatile due to his being a target to throw out for virtually any draw power you could possibly be running in a deck that would include him. It makes him a much more reliable draw than other high-cost-high-power cards.

 

He still doesn't have any real effect on the meta.

[/quote']

 

But wouldn't Plasma negate Phantom of Chaos' effect, or negate the effect of the card copied by Phantom of Chaos?

 

And what do you mean he doesn't have any real effect on the meta?

[El Majishan]

Plasma = Blood

Blood= Bloo-D

 

He is awesomeness. Takes your opp monster and negates their effects.

Great in a deck build around him. He loves tokens. Makes love to pretty much

any decent draw card. Yup Plasma is the man

[The Dark One]

Anyways' date=' excellent control card. Very well balanced design, but regrettably runs into issue with other not-so-well-balanced-cards like Phantom of Chaos. He's quite versatile due to his being a target to throw out for virtually any draw power you could possibly be running in a deck that would include him. It makes him a much more reliable draw than other high-cost-high-power cards.

 

He still doesn't have any real effect on the meta.

[/quote']

 

But wouldn't Plasma negate Phantom of Chaos' effect, or negate the effect of the card copied by Phantom of Chaos?

 

And what do you mean he doesn't have any real effect on the meta?

 

You don't use them simultaneously. You remove Plasma for PoC's effect to grab an opponent's monster, attack over another of your opponent's monsters, and dispose of the first monster in the endphase when the PoC reverts.

 

However, Plasma only applies to your opponent's monsters, so he wouldn't anyways.

 

And I mean exactly what I said. Presently there are no significant decks running Plasma. He just isn't fast enough to get out or long-lasting enough on the field to be worth it in this overcharged metagame.

[KdogPrime]

Anyways' date=' excellent control card. Very well balanced design, but regrettably runs into issue with other not-so-well-balanced-cards like Phantom of Chaos. He's quite versatile due to his being a target to throw out for virtually any draw power you could possibly be running in a deck that would include him. It makes him a much more reliable draw than other high-cost-high-power cards.

 

He still doesn't have any real effect on the meta.

[/quote']

 

But wouldn't Plasma negate Phantom of Chaos' effect, or negate the effect of the card copied by Phantom of Chaos?

 

And what do you mean he doesn't have any real effect on the meta?

 

You don't use them simultaneously. You remove Plasma for PoC's effect to grab an opponent's monster, attack over another of your opponent's monsters, and dispose of the first monster in the endphase when the PoC reverts.

 

However, Plasma only applies to your opponent's monsters, so he wouldn't anyways.

 

And I mean exactly what I said. Presently there are no significant decks running Plasma. He just isn't fast enough to get out or long-lasting enough on the field to be worth it in this overcharged metagame.

 

Oh I see, you meant using Plasma WITH Phantom of Chaos.

 

I'm sorry, but that's pretty obscure. You could make the same arguement with pretty much any effect monster for PoC.

 

Personally I think you are an idiot if you run your deck trying to get out just one monster, and Plasma wouldn't be it, but he's a good support monster to have. Like I said before, in my warrior deck before they limited Reinforcement of the Army, I played 3 tribute cards like Plasma and Gilford the Lightning all the time.

[The Dark One]

Anyways' date=' excellent control card. Very well balanced design, but regrettably runs into issue with other not-so-well-balanced-cards like Phantom of Chaos. He's quite versatile due to his being a target to throw out for virtually any draw power you could possibly be running in a deck that would include him. It makes him a much more reliable draw than other high-cost-high-power cards.

 

He still doesn't have any real effect on the meta.

[/quote']

 

But wouldn't Plasma negate Phantom of Chaos' effect, or negate the effect of the card copied by Phantom of Chaos?

 

And what do you mean he doesn't have any real effect on the meta?

 

You don't use them simultaneously. You remove Plasma for PoC's effect to grab an opponent's monster, attack over another of your opponent's monsters, and dispose of the first monster in the endphase when the PoC reverts.

 

However, Plasma only applies to your opponent's monsters, so he wouldn't anyways.

 

And I mean exactly what I said. Presently there are no significant decks running Plasma. He just isn't fast enough to get out or long-lasting enough on the field to be worth it in this overcharged metagame.

 

Oh I see, you meant using Plasma WITH Phantom of Chaos.

 

I'm sorry, but that's pretty obscure. You could make the same arguement with pretty much any effect monster for PoC.

 

Personally I think you are an idiot if you run your deck trying to get out just one monster, and Plasma wouldn't be it, but he's a good support monster to have. Like I said before, in my warrior deck before they limited Reinforcement of the Army, I played 3 tribute cards like Plasma and Gilford the Lightning all the time.

 

You could make the argument with pretty much any effect monster with a high-powered effect that is either just broken to begin with or is balanced by difficult summoning conditions. That's exactly what Plasma is. You could make that same argument for Norleras and others. That's why PoC is banworthy.

 

The thing is, Gilford the Lightning is terrible, and your warrior deck is not metabreaking. Plasma isn't finding his way into any top decks right now. He's just not fast enough to be worth it.

[KdogPrime]

Anyways' date=' excellent control card. Very well balanced design, but regrettably runs into issue with other not-so-well-balanced-cards like Phantom of Chaos. He's quite versatile due to his being a target to throw out for virtually any draw power you could possibly be running in a deck that would include him. It makes him a much more reliable draw than other high-cost-high-power cards.

 

He still doesn't have any real effect on the meta.

[/quote']

 

But wouldn't Plasma negate Phantom of Chaos' effect, or negate the effect of the card copied by Phantom of Chaos?

 

And what do you mean he doesn't have any real effect on the meta?

 

You don't use them simultaneously. You remove Plasma for PoC's effect to grab an opponent's monster, attack over another of your opponent's monsters, and dispose of the first monster in the endphase when the PoC reverts.

 

However, Plasma only applies to your opponent's monsters, so he wouldn't anyways.

 

And I mean exactly what I said. Presently there are no significant decks running Plasma. He just isn't fast enough to get out or long-lasting enough on the field to be worth it in this overcharged metagame.

 

Oh I see, you meant using Plasma WITH Phantom of Chaos.

 

I'm sorry, but that's pretty obscure. You could make the same arguement with pretty much any effect monster for PoC.

 

Personally I think you are an idiot if you run your deck trying to get out just one monster, and Plasma wouldn't be it, but he's a good support monster to have. Like I said before, in my warrior deck before they limited Reinforcement of the Army, I played 3 tribute cards like Plasma and Gilford the Lightning all the time.

 

You could make the argument with pretty much any effect monster with a high-powered effect that is either just broken to begin with or is balanced by difficult summoning conditions. That's exactly what Plasma is. You could make that same argument for Norleras and others. That's why PoC is banworthy.

 

The thing is, Gilford the Lightning is terrible, and your warrior deck is not metabreaking. Plasma isn't finding his way into any top decks right now. He's just not fast enough to be worth it.

 

I'm tired of hearing people talking about the "meta". It means nothing to me. I'm not a tournament player and I play this game for fun (or lulz). I put in the monsters I like, and I like Gilford the Lightning. I couldn't give a sheet whether or not my warrior deck isn't "metabreaking". With the amount of cards I have, I could make several tournament worthy decks. And now that LIGHT and DARK isn't the only way to go anymore, I'm going to be able to significantly improve my warrior deck, spellcaster, water, insect and zombie decks.

[The Dark One]

Anyways' date=' excellent control card. Very well balanced design, but regrettably runs into issue with other not-so-well-balanced-cards like Phantom of Chaos. He's quite versatile due to his being a target to throw out for virtually any draw power you could possibly be running in a deck that would include him. It makes him a much more reliable draw than other high-cost-high-power cards.

 

He still doesn't have any real effect on the meta.

[/quote']

 

But wouldn't Plasma negate Phantom of Chaos' effect, or negate the effect of the card copied by Phantom of Chaos?

 

And what do you mean he doesn't have any real effect on the meta?

 

You don't use them simultaneously. You remove Plasma for PoC's effect to grab an opponent's monster, attack over another of your opponent's monsters, and dispose of the first monster in the endphase when the PoC reverts.

 

However, Plasma only applies to your opponent's monsters, so he wouldn't anyways.

 

And I mean exactly what I said. Presently there are no significant decks running Plasma. He just isn't fast enough to get out or long-lasting enough on the field to be worth it in this overcharged metagame.

 

Oh I see, you meant using Plasma WITH Phantom of Chaos.

 

I'm sorry, but that's pretty obscure. You could make the same arguement with pretty much any effect monster for PoC.

 

Personally I think you are an idiot if you run your deck trying to get out just one monster, and Plasma wouldn't be it, but he's a good support monster to have. Like I said before, in my warrior deck before they limited Reinforcement of the Army, I played 3 tribute cards like Plasma and Gilford the Lightning all the time.

 

You could make the argument with pretty much any effect monster with a high-powered effect that is either just broken to begin with or is balanced by difficult summoning conditions. That's exactly what Plasma is. You could make that same argument for Norleras and others. That's why PoC is banworthy.

 

The thing is, Gilford the Lightning is terrible, and your warrior deck is not metabreaking. Plasma isn't finding his way into any top decks right now. He's just not fast enough to be worth it.

 

I'm tired of hearing people talking about the "meta". It means nothing to me. I'm not a tournament player and I play this game for fun (or lulz). I put in the monsters I like, and I like Gilford the Lightning. I couldn't give a s*** whether or not my warrior deck isn't "metabreaking". With the amount of cards I have, I could make several tournament worthy decks. And now that LIGHT and DARK isn't the only way to go anymore, I'm going to be able to significantly improve my warrior deck, spellcaster, water, insect and zombie decks.

Then what are you possibly trying to argue with me about? I said that Plasma isn't worth it in top=tier decks right now. That's true. You can disregard the existence of the top-tier as much as you like, that fact won't change.