Jolta Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Well, I find it bad... Look at THAT effect, no, you know which one I'm talkin' about. I'm too lazy to check if its in the Banlist.Just look at THAT effect. Like, You hit your opponent, then again, and again, and finally, you die! Unless... You use some card to negate it! If you don't have that card, you die. This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by removing 1 LIGHT and 1 DARK monster in your Graveyard from play. Once during each of your turns, you can select and activate 1 of the following effects:● Remove 1 monster on the field from play. If you activate this effect, this card cannot attack during this turn.● If this card destroyed your opponent's monster as a result of battle, it can attack once again in a row. Yeah, and you know what I'm saying, are you?Now, I'm gonna check if its banned... If it is, good, if its not, still good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 its banned aswell as the Envoy of the End >.> these 2 are pretty much what caused the Chaos format to be so good but if it returned, lightsworn may go FUUUUUUUUUUUUU- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 I have 7 of these. One of my faveorite cards ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted October 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 I have 7 of these. One of my faveorite cards ever. If there was no limit in the number of cards you have, you'll epic Win! Like, "Number 1, Attack!" Then bash all of the monsters o your opponent's side of the field... Then the others can attack directly! Wnage! That is, if you could get it out of the Banlist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 .......Someone seriously had no idea this was banned? Please, please let this be a joke topic <_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Joke topic or not, someone needs to remember the ruling that says he has a maximum of 1 extra attack from his effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 This card is retarded! Seriously! Why would Konami add the first effect? WHY WOULD YOU USE THE FIRST EFFECT???? It makes no sense. But again, Konami sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 This card is retarded! Seriously! Why would Konami add the first effect? WHY WOULD YOU USE THE FIRST EFFECT???? It makes no sense. But again' date=' Konami sucks.[/quote'] Phail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Why would you use the first effect? Plenty of reasons, they could have a Ryko f/d, a Mashmallon on the field, or all sorts of other things that it's a bad idea/not possible to run over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Why you would use the first effect? Stardust is really useful when it's removed from play, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyosuke Kiryu Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Why you would use the first effect? Stardust is really useful when it's removed from play' date=' isn't it?[/quote'] Teach me to be like you.;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Just look at THAT effect. Like' date=' You hit your opponent, then again, and again, and finally, you die! Unless... You use some card to negate it! If you don't have that card, you die.[/quote'] If "Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning" attacks and destroys your opponent's monster' date=' then attacks a second time and destroys another monster, it does not get to attack any more that turn.[/quote'] You were saying? EDIT: Dwaammit, Griffin999 beat me do it D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammidysam Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 I wish a had this and it wasn't banned... Then my friends and I could play with 2000 life points! Hmm Hmm = Pwn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 I hope this entire thread is just a big [/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Why you would use the first effect? Stardust is really useful when it's removed from play' date=' isn't it?[/quote'] Teach me to be like you.;) Stardust wasn't much of an example, was it? Envoy could just run over Stardust and attack again. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Why you would use the first effect? Stardust is really useful when it's removed from play' date=' isn't it?[/quote'] Teach me to be like you.;) Stardust wasn't much of an example, was it? Envoy could just run over Stardust and attack again. =/ Colossal Fighter would be a much more useful example. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 The "attack once again" effect isn't the broken part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Why you would use the first effect? Stardust is really useful when it's removed from play' date=' isn't it?[/quote'] Teach me to be like you.;) Stardust wasn't much of an example, was it? Envoy could just run over Stardust and attack again. =/ Colossal Fighter would be a much more useful example. ;) I humbly apologize. Let me return to my den and cry in solitude. *leaves* But yes, Colossal is a much better example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 will be limited next banlist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 Well' date=' I find it bad... Look at THAT effect, no, you know which one I'm talkin' about. I'm too lazy to check if its in the Banlist.Just look at THAT effect. Like, You hit your opponent, then again, and again, and finally, you die! Unless... You use some card to negate it! If you don't have that card, you die. [/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkest Hour Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 With Honest, this card is godlike. and it's a Secret Rare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazerrick Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 will be limited next banlist Any Proof? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 500 post~Chaos would be lulz if this got limited... but I doubt it. Too much of a beatstick for minimal summoning conditions... reason Sorc is @ 2 is that it can't run over most boss monsters without its effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted October 25, 2009 Report Share Posted October 25, 2009 will be limited next banlist Any Proof? Konami's making the list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinzo Posted October 26, 2009 Report Share Posted October 26, 2009 The one card i love more than a jinzo. lets have our moments of silence so we can hear the agonizing screams of people we have played this card against......................................................................................................................................you may proceed with this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.