burnpsy Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 [align=center] Activate only when an effect was activated that destroys 2 or more cards you control. Negate that effect and destroy that card. Then' date=' you can Special Summon 1 "Stardust Dragon" from your Extra Deck.[/quote'][/align] We're nearing its release, so shall we discuss this again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 It works even if I play heavy storm too! What makes time pass faster? D: I want this NOW... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 use with multiply and torrential tribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted January 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 use with multiply and torrential tribute. Nope, Multiply's effect always fills up your zones, there's no room left on the field for Stardust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 "Activate only when an effect was activated that destroys 2 or more cards you control." I keep wondering about this... Is it really saying "when a card effect was activated that at the time of activation would destroy 2 or more cards", or "a card whose effect states that it will destroys 2 or more cards", such as Icarus Attack or something. I guess it wouldn't be as useful if it were the latter, so hopefully the former. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Most likely the first. Also, would you waste a torrential to bring this out rather than nuking their feild? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 use with multiply and torrential tribute. Nope' date=' Multiply's effect always fills up your zones, there's no room left on the field for Stardust.[/quote'] I said torrential tribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted January 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 use with multiply and torrential tribute. Nope' date=' Multiply's effect always fills up your zones, there's no room left on the field for Stardust.[/quote'] I said torrential tribute. If you activate this in response, TT will be negated, and you'll still have 5 monsters out and no space for Stardust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Delinquent Girl NiAtSoFi Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 My Body As A Shield with... -1500 LP cost+1 Special Summon Stardust Dragon Stardust Dragon is really broken now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Black Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 it can't be all that simple to use. it can eliminate a lot of staples like mirror, torrential, and heavy, but i just don't see it being playable all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killey Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 At best you run 1 of this in your deck and I know some japanese decks are using this card at 1 but it seems more like a side deck choice. It definitely makes for an ideal tech choice against Blackwings since they run 2-3 Icarus Attack, Blackrose Dragon and Heavy Storm for sure. There is the possibility they main deck Torrential Tribute, Lightning Vortex and Mirror Force as well so you are looking at 7-8 very commonly played cards that see play in pretty much every duel that can meet this cards activation requirements. Though I'd be hard pressed running more than 1 copy of this card in a deck and there's always the potential of this being a dead draw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 perfect side against JD. [/thread] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Fun-Fact: Your Stardust is doomed if its ever beaten in battle. Other then that, this card seems pretty abusive. I like ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Awesome card. DO WANT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Ill probably replace the MBAAS I main with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Should of had been a counter trap. >_> Anyway, its release is in April lol. Ages away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted January 22, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Anyway' date=' its release is in April lol. Ages away[/quote'] March 9th. That's 47 days, not very far off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Anyway' date=' its release is in April lol. Ages away[/quote'] March 9th. That's 47 days, not very far off. Argh. The future freaks me out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 This is One of the cards that will make Infernities SO MUCH FUNNIES<<<This and Claymore Dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Stardust Dragon is really broken now. Because "good" = "broken"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Stardust Dragon is really broken now. Because "good" = "broken"? hey, to each his(or her) own. a good number of people I know think synchro summoning is far too easy for the monsters it produces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Should be banned.The only reason to keep something as broken as Heavy Storm away from the banlist is to punish overextension. Releasing a card that not only encourages overextension, but also gives you a +1 in the form of a 2500 beater is stupid. When an anti-meta player says that one of the best cards in an anti-meta deck is bannable, you know that there is something wrong ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 Should be banned.The only reason to keep something as broken as Heavy Storm away from the banlist is to punish overextension. Releasing a card that not only encourages overextension' date=' but also gives you a +1 in the form of a 2500 beater is stupid. [s']When an anti-meta player says that one of the best cards in an anti-meta deck is bannable, you know that there is something wrong ...[/s] but it also protects aganist wipe effects, which are just as bad for the game as un-threatened overextension, though for different reasons. this card stops them. and this card is inherently defensive, meaning that you can't abuse it without using up 2 cards on your own field, and only a few cards can do an effect that kills your own 2+ cards. (that are worth using at least.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daboss144 Posted January 22, 2010 Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 I'm pretty sure that this card is going to say something along the lines of "if a card you opponent controls destorys 2 or more cards on your side of the field..." that way it's not quite as abuseable. Anyway, I think that this is the excuse for Konami to ban/limit stardust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted January 22, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2010 I'm pretty sure that this card is going to say something along the lines of "if a card you opponent controls destorys 2 or more cards on your side of the field..." that way it's not quite as abuseable. Anyway' date=' I think that this is the excuse for Konami to ban/limit stardust.[/quote'] This was released in Japan AGES AGO, with the same wording as in the first post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.