=Icygriffin= Great White Mako Shredder

[Guest JoshIcy]

[align=center]

When this card is Summoned, you can send any number of Fish-Type Monsters from your Deck to the graveyard. Then, decrease the ATK of all monsters on your Opponents field by 500 x the number sent. While this card is on the field, if a Monsters ATK would be reduced to 0, send it to the graveyard.[/align]

[Lefty]

nice card to add to a fish deck.. Whats that thing sticking in the middle of its chest..?

9.5/10

[Guest JoshIcy]

ANyone else?

[ragnarok1945]

and you criticize me on MY reviews

 

graveyard should be Graveyard

 

The "Then" in the text is not necessary

 

and finally, for the last effect, you should have said if a monster's atk is reduce to 0 from this card's effect, as atk reducing cards are abundant nowadays

 

7/10

[Guest JoshIcy]

ITT: Ragnarok didn't get the memo on how I see OCG.

[kidwarrior77]

the pic is awesome just the effect is really broken

pic 9/10

effect 4.5/10

[ragnarok1945]

right, like your version of the OCG is always the right one

[Guest JoshIcy]

right' date=' like your version of the OCG is always the right one

[/quote']

 

Never said it was, not once. I said that I don't care for it, as long as the effect is perfectly legible, as it remains a language not a perfectionist argument. Which allows for flexibility and less concern on how the effect is written and more on how the effect is done.

 

It may not be the "right" way, but it sure as hell allows me to relax more. I saw the errors in how I spelled some words, but since it's merely capitals etc, I just left it.

[Guest Zeonark]

C'mon Ragna and Icy. Let's not argue.

 

The card is quite useful once summoned. Good for powering down incredibly strong monsters. It's second effect actually reminds me of a shark too.

 

This card would've been ridiculous if it destroyed all 0 ATK monsters though. xD

[ragnarok1945]

and this means I get to use the statement you used on me

 

your lack of caring simply translates into you lack the ability to know what you're really saying

[Guest JoshIcy]

and this means I get to use the statement you used on me

 

your lack of caring simply translates into you lack the ability to know what you're really saying

 

Oh dear god no it doesn't. I don't care for language like the rest of RC why? Because I was brought up with broken english. I can handle little errors like that and it looks perfectly fine to me, and due to the flexibility of less perfection mindsets the effect itself can flourish more. I care too much about the idea to care about the language its used in. And if someone wants a clearer version, I will happily state why.

 

And here just for you. I'll translate that last paragraph into my native dialect.

 

Bugga no stay dat kine way. Way I say `em no like ebery buddie. Cuz was raised wit dis kine word a? No worries wit dis way, stay get moa wit`em boo. I cay`ah too much bout ebery ting to kea how I say em as long as can reed em. An if get problem, can go a`nata way, no need`em stay hammajang jus cuz I lazy.

 

Thanks Zeonark. I thought about that one rofl. Semi-useful in Spiders too.

[ragnarok1945]

and you think that broken english is an excuse? When are you ever going to learn not to cut corners?

 

You forget, English isn't even my first language myself, so your reasoning means nothing

[Guest JoshIcy]

and you think that broken english is an excuse? When are you ever going to learn not to cut corners?

 

You forget' date=' English isn't even my first language myself, so your reasoning means nothing

[/quote']

 

Or rather, we share a common ground with standards aimed at different subjects. This truly has been fun. Now, what do you think about the idea behind the card itself? (An upcoming project between me and -Griffin will require this card to have its OCG fixed anyway, so you're good there).

[usetheforcehan]

Both of you STOP tongue-slashing please...

 

OCG's Fix:

 

Great White Mako Shredder

When this card is Summoned, you can send any number of Fish-Type monsters from your Deck to the Graveyard and decrease the ATK of all monsters your opponents controls by 500 for every Fish-Type monsters that is sent this way. As long as this card remains on the field, destroy all monsters with 0 ATK.

 

Great effect but OP'd. Put some restriction on the Summon-part or this card will be spammed by player.

[ragnarok1945]

Did you forget what I said at the end of the rate?

 

I said for the atk reduced to 0 effect, make it so that it only applies TO THIS CARD ONLY

 

atk reduction cards are everywhere these days

[Yankee]

ITT: Ragnarok didn't get the memo on how I see OCG.

 

Oh shut up...>_>

 

You posted in RC, expect OCG fixes. You can't just make OCG mean nothing, as it does mean something.

 

 

Anyway,

Seems overpowered to me..o.0

[Guest JoshIcy]

Both of you STOP tongue-slashing please...

 

OCG's Fix:

 

Great White Mako Shredder

When this card is Summoned' date=' you can send any number of Fish-Type monsters from your Deck to the Graveyard and decrease the ATK of all monsters your opponents controls by 500 for every Fish-Type monsters that is sent this way. As long as this card remains on the field, destroy all monsters with 0 ATK.

 

Great effect but OP'd. Put some restriction on the Summon-part or this card will be spammed by player.

[/quote']

 

No your version is overpowered. As mine only states that cards whos attacks are reduced to 0, cards who's attack is already 0 arent affected.

 

@Rag: I wanted it to be restated or added emphasis.

I don't see many commonly used ATK reducers besides Spiders these days. (Which was only released like 2-3 packs ago).

[Sander]

and you think that broken english is an excuse? When are you ever going to learn not to cut corners?

 

You forget' date=' English isn't even my first language myself, so your reasoning means nothing

[/quote']

 

Ragnarok, stop your jabroniing around. Your whole argument is useless. I mean, the errors that Icy made aren't even that relevant. The effect is still understandable so there's no actual need to complain about it.

 

ON TOPIC: Nice card again Icy, glad to see that you haven't lost your touch.

[ragnarok1945]

oh yes I see.

 

Just because YOU don't see it automatically has to mean it applies EVERYWHERE

[Guest JoshIcy]

Xander, calm down lol. We solved it on our own, don't need you butting in. But thanks.

Your opinion on the card?

 

EDIT: Thanks lol, I try not to get rusty ><

[Cloister]

It can easily destroy all monsters your opponent controls.

And it can therefor allow your monsters to attack directly.

I think the ATK of it should be decreased, but the ATK decrease should imo be lowered to 400, instead of 500

[.Requiem]

Looks fun in obviously fish decks and fish need more support theses days.

 

Maybe just increase its level by 1 or 2? Seems overpowered to me as well.

[Sander]

Xander' date=' calm down lol. We solved it on our own, don't need you butting in. But thanks.

Your opinion on the card?

[/quote']

 

Sorry bout that, but it's just that the arguments of Ragnarok were just too...stupid, and it pissed me off, seeing how he really was serious about it..

 

Anyways, the cards is fine. Good support for Fish-Type cards, and really, overall decent card. Not overpowered or underpowered.

[-Griffin]

It can easily destroy all monsters your opponent controls.

And it can therefor allow your monsters to attack directly.

I think the ATK of it should be decreased' date=' but the ATK decrease should imo be lowered to 400, instead of 500

[/quote']

 

The most effective Deck that this would fit into is Coelcanth, and sending more than a few cards with this guy's effect could ruin a Coel build, so it actually has a much larger long-term cost than is immediately apparent. Actually pretty balanced considering current Decktypes IMO.

[Yankee]

I say the 500 per fish is too much...

1950 ATK is WAY too much for this effect..

I mean...just 2 fish from the Deck gets rid of anything with 2900 or less with this guy...

 

Just plain overpowered to me...

 

Also:

Graveyard