Toffee. Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 A generic thread name? How is such a thing possible?[align=center]Remove from play 3 Spell Cards from your Graveyard. Draw 2 cards.[/align]Its an anime card of doom, prepare to facepalm.The card itself is a +1. But its just as situational as Pot of Avarice. Discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scatty Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 No way, this is much better than Avarice. Thank God it's not real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cavv10 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 New LS tech? xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 No way' date=' this is much better than Avarice.[/quote'] .....No, I mean like the conditions for them are really similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 But its just as situational as Pot of Avarice. Indeed. It's sort of like how Dark Armed Dragon is just as situational as Exodia Necross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Toon Table of Contents Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Pot of Greed that is unbanned on DMG ftw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 If this gets made, I swear EVERY deck will tech atleast 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 holy god damn. If they do it'll be to the list i'm thinking. Its a better version of avarice and can have decks made around it. awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 But its just as situational as Pot of Avarice. Indeed. It's sort of like how Dark Armed Dragon is just as situational as Exodia Necross. OH YES, BECAUSE OBVEIOUSLY HAVING TO DO WITH CARDS IN THE GRAVEYARD FOR A +1 IS NOWHERE NEAR THE SAME AS HAVING TO DO WITH CARDS IN THE GRAVEYARD FOR A +1. Derp, Crab's logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 But its just as situational as Pot of Avarice. Indeed. It's sort of like how Dark Armed Dragon is just as situational as Exodia Necross. OH YES' date=' BECAUSE OBVEIOUSLY HAVING TO DO WITH CARDS IN THE GRAVEYARD FOR A +1 IS NOWHERE NEAR THE SAME AS HAVING TO DO WITH CARDS IN THE GRAVEYARD FOR A +1. Derp, Crab's logic.[/quote'] Crab's point is the fact that it's much easier and simpler to get 3 spells in the grave than 5 monsters. This also doesn't cause your deck to thicken so it's even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 But its just as situational as Pot of Avarice. Indeed. It's sort of like how Dark Armed Dragon is just as situational as Exodia Necross. OH YES' date=' BECAUSE OBVEIOUSLY HAVING TO DO WITH CARDS IN THE GRAVEYARD FOR A +1 IS NOWHERE NEAR THE SAME AS HAVING TO DO WITH CARDS IN THE GRAVEYARD FOR A +1. Derp, Crab's logic.[/quote'] Crab's point is the fact that it's much easier and simpler to get 3 spells in the grave than 5 monsters. This also doesn't cause your deck to thicken so it's even better.Well yea. Also, this + Magical Explosion/Blasting the Ruins would be interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 This actually hurts Magical Explosion and Blasting the Ruins... I'm confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Doesn't this hinder magical explosion? and the whole tuningware OTK on top of that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 i would run this regardless.... most decks tend to run at least 12-15 spells...so its a fair ratio i reckon... this would be epic in traditional.... seeing as most decks run 18+ spell cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 DMG staple card and it needs to get banned -.- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 DMG staple card and it needs to get banned -.- Pretty much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 and most likely will.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 More akin to a Pot of Greed that can't be used necessarily easy early game in every deck than Pot of Avarice imo. Though let's be honest, what use do spells in the grave typically serve? Pretty much none last time I checked. Though, I'd love to use this in some kind of deck utilizing D.D. Borderline and using Spell Striker to remove this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cavv10 Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Diamond Dude loves it too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 I SPY EMPTY JAR TECH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.