Toffee. Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Keeping a 3300 beater that negates 1 destruction is still awesome.But they could still use another destruction card to beat it >__> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted May 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Keeping a 3300 beater that negates 1 destruction is still awesome.But they could still use another destruction card to beat it >__> Doesn't this apply to every single card in the game though? <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Keeping a 3300 beater that negates 1 destruction is still awesome.But they could still use another destruction card to beat it >__> Doesn't this apply to every single card in the game though? <_< Not with Prime Material or White Knight Dragon(if they are using targeting cards) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 If that's the current effect, then even more so than before I still prefer Assault Mode to this x.o; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 Maybe the effect means that you can activate all of 3 effects per turn , but only once each?^Yeah, it doesn't make sense Just wait for official Rulings, shall we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 Epic card is epic. Once on the field = game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 Maybe the effect means that you can activate all of 3 effects per turn ' date=' but only once each?^Yeah, it doesn't make sense[/quote'] Erm... That's precisely what it means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metalflygon08 Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 I'm thinking with all the 'Star' monsters it's going to be an Archtype... (I'm waiting for a Fusion of BEWD and Stardust) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Cakey Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 I'm thinking with all the 'Star' monsters it's going to be an Archtype... (I'm waiting for a Fusion of BEWD and Stardust) No silly, it would have to be a fusion of BEWD and RDA. Stardust would have to fuse with BLS or Neos. *tries to imagine the fusion. fails* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 No silly' date=' it would have to be a fusion of BEWD and RDA. [/quote'] Liek this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.