Canadian Posted July 5, 2010 Report Share Posted July 5, 2010 This has always been one of my most favourite cards. Disc it, it's awesomeness and uses, and it's banlist position. <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted July 5, 2010 Report Share Posted July 5, 2010 IMO, should be @2. @2, it's usable with Dupe, but I don't think it's outrightly broken. I also love the card <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EHN. Posted July 5, 2010 Report Share Posted July 5, 2010 Why the hell is this @ 1. *sighs* Well, yeah, it's so much fun <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted July 5, 2010 Report Share Posted July 5, 2010 If this and Grand Mole went back to 2, I would be so happy. 8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted July 5, 2010 Report Share Posted July 5, 2010 It mills, and it lets you draw when destroyed. THIS funking THING IS BADASS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
championduelist62 Posted July 5, 2010 Report Share Posted July 5, 2010 Troop Dupe Scoop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 5, 2010 Report Share Posted July 5, 2010 THIS f***ing THING IS BADASS!This Troop Dupe ScoopYea, pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 6, 2010 Report Share Posted July 6, 2010 IMO' date=' should be @2. @2, it's usable with Dupe, but I don't think it's outrightly broken. I also love the card <3[/quote'] Actually this card is one of the few cards you could make a case for being @ 2. Still, in the TroopDupeScoop thing, Limiter Removal is banworthy anyway so that is removed from the equation and it is only through Machine Duplication that Trooper is able to interact with 2 other copies of itself so without the existence of Machine Duplication, Card Trooper can be @ 3. However, Machine Duplication itself isn't really bannable considering it can only summon weak Machines. Trooper however can become a beatstick and replaces itself if destroyed and sent to the Graveyard in the form of a draw. Assuming Trooper is @ 3, using Machine Duplication on Trooper to allow you to summon 2 Troopers is a +1. Not only that but Trooper can become a beatstick in a pinch and it replaces itself in the form of a draw when destroyed and sent to the Graveyard. @ 2, Trooper can only interact with 1 other copy of itself so it instead is a +0 through Machine Duplication. Basically, with that logic, you either ban Machine Duplication so Trooper can be @ 3 or leave Machine Duplication @ 3 and Semi-Limit or even Limit Card Trooper if for some reason you see any interaction with Trooper via Machine Duplication and other copies of Trooper unacceptable. Either way, 5 > 3 and 4 > 3. Machine Duplication itself cetainly gives more to the game than a relatively splashable beatstick and more cards allowed in the allowed card pool (banworthy cards not-withstanding so forget stuff like DAD, JD and the like) is certainly better for the game. Why the hell is this @ 1. *sighs* Well' date=' yeah, it's so much fun <3[/quote'] TroopDupeScoop. Trooper + Machine Duplication + Limiter Removal. If this and Grand Mole went back to 2' date=' I would be so happy. 8)[/quote'] Grand Mole should be @ 3. Why 2? Troop Dupe Scoop Yeah pretty much but Limiter Removal should be banned anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted July 6, 2010 Report Share Posted July 6, 2010 god, this and mole and 3 would be lulzy................. i doubt this will come off its limited position though.....i just don't see it happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EHN. Posted July 6, 2010 Report Share Posted July 6, 2010 If this and Grand Mole went back to 2' date=' I would be so happy. 8)[/quote'] Exactly my thoughts =p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.