Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Amazing card. This is how you design good and balanced cards Konami. Was that so hard?

 

You think he is balanced? Whats his drawback? RFPing a dragon? Personally, I think he's a little OP'ed for the +1 each turn. Thing is, because dragons aren't a threat to anybody REDMD can just sit nice and pretty @3. Too bad we don't have more decent/broke dragons for a dragon themed deck.

 

Offtopic: Prime Material Dragon = sex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think he is balanced? Whats his drawback? RFPing a dragon? Personally, I think he's a little OP'ed for the +1 each turn. Thing is, because dragons aren't a threat to anybody REDMD can just sit nice and pretty @3. Too bad we don't have more decent/broke dragons for a dragon themed deck.

 

And what is wrong with that? Keep in mind that just because a card is a +1, it doesn't necessarily mean it is banworthy. Not only that, it is restricted to a Deck built mostly around Dragon-Type monsters to be playable and the Dragon Type itself is rather inconsistent. If you think a Type-specific +1 every turn is banworthy then lets just say Gigaplant and Il Blud are banworthy too.

 

So Breaker, Solidarity, etc ... are banworthy and this is wonderful and balanced.

 

 

I give up.

 

The thing is that Breaker is banworthy though. Just because a card isn't a problem now (keep in mind the current Metagame has bigger problems than a rather splashable and easy to play MST with legs that can attack afterwards) it doesn't change the effect of a card or the fact a banworthy card is banworthy. With Solidarity, I myself am not too sure about it since while it can make strong Level 4 or lower beatsticks about as powerful if not more powerful than say Monarchs or weak stuff like Gadgets into 2000+ ATK beatsticks, it does force you to have a Deck with pretty much only 1 type of Monster and that itself seems like something that can save it from the banhammer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How the Hell is this not banworthy, even if it does not fare well in the meta? You are talking about RFG a Dragon (normally a LV4) to summon 2 more Dragons, probably 2400+ ATK. Even worse, is the fact that you can still use your Normal Summon or Set per turn, and that in next turns you can still bring 1 more Dragon that has 2400 or more ATK.

 

Because swarming the field was never enough, a card that is a 2 at the cost of 1, swarms with gigantic beatsticks and has its own themed revival card is NOT banworthy. I love the logic used here.

 

You can say that this card is good, or that it is not problem nowadays, or that you do not want it touched because it's dragon's centerpiece card and you like dragons, I do not care which one you pick. But for the sake of God, you cannot say this card is not broken or that Breaker is more banworthy than this card is, because it is not that way at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think he is balanced? Whats his drawback? RFPing a dragon? Personally, I think he's a little OP'ed for the +1 each turn. Thing is, because dragons aren't a threat to anybody REDMD can just sit nice and pretty @3. Too bad we don't have more decent/broke dragons for a dragon themed deck.

 

Offtopic: Prime Material Dragon = sex.

Never question Judgment Phoenix and PMD is pretty awesome but i wouldnt do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...