DARKPLANT RISING Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100302101936/yugioh/images/thumb/f/f8/ChaosSorcererTU02-EN-UR-UE.jpg/400px-ChaosSorcererTU02-EN-UR-UE.jpg[/img] So I pluck out my friend's Chaos Sorcerer with Mark of the Rose and activate its effect upon itself so it doesn't come back next turn. My friend is like "f***". If it was in the anime, the "vertual reality" thing would be hilariously dumb. Anyhow, discuss on the only left Grave-Chaos Monster left that actually has potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 amazing card. easy to summon, no drawback....... nothing bad you can say about it really... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 It may not be a staple or semi-staple, but certain decks types need this card for survival. One of the most balanced cards that can summon itself and still be playable IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 It was bannable years ago, it's still bannable today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 This card is an outright pain. Anbu loves it, though. Which probably is why I currently hate it. Not because it's good, although it definitely is, but because I've seen it too often. Not as broken as the other Chaos monsters, but a 2300 easy once per turn removal is still pretty powerful. Doesn't really require that much dedication, which works in its favor for a lot of decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1288974483' post='4763442'] Not as broken as the other Chaos monsters, [/quote] Not as broken =/= Not broken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1288976010' post='4763467'] Not as broken =/= Not broken [/quote] I don't see where he implied that [code]Not_as_broken == Not_broken[/code] in his post at all. I'm sure we can all agree that it is somewhat broken, though there are plenty of more broken cards out there that need to be banned too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1288970292' post='4763376'] It was bannable years ago, it's still bannable today. [/quote] But Konami has control over the B& list .__. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 I'm calling it, March: Konami bans Dark Hole and limits Raigeki because it sets up Sangan and Dandy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 [quote name='Expelsword' timestamp='1288990545' post='4763941'] I'm calling it, March: Konami bans Dark Hole and limits Raigeki because it sets up Sangan and Dandy [/quote] Stop being dumb, it's against the rules. This is one of the better common cards out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 Broken. Easy 2300 beatstick that can remove any moster is not good for the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 Excellent card. Staple in a lot of decks. Needs to be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 [quote name='Canadian' timestamp='1288991501' post='4763979'] Stop being dumb, it's against the rules. This is one of the better common cards out there. [/quote] Konami was dumb... I liked Heavy Storm... OT: Pretty sweet, Low ATK keeps it from breaking the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 [quote name='Champion Lance' timestamp='1288992298' post='4764021'] Needs to be banned. [/quote] There are a couple of Synchros (and other cards) that need attention before this.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 But guys, Konami's logic is this~ The B& list has to be: -Stupid -Smart -Fun All at the same time. So the next list will be.... Raigeki @3 Card Trooper @2 Black Rose @1 Stardust @1 D-Draw @2 Future Fusion @0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted November 5, 2010 Report Share Posted November 5, 2010 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1288974483' post='4763442'] This card is an outright pain. Anbu loves it, though. [/quote] Why yes I do. My favorite card to use. In my opinion, Limited is where it should stay. Not Semi-Limited, not Banned, not Unlimited (Lol). But Limited at the least. Semi-Limited is doing just lovely things for the Decks I run Chaos Sorcerer in (which would be all of my Decks). I was able to get 2 of these out in less than 2 turns. Unlimited would just make Chaos Sorcerer somewhat more of a dead draw. Things wouldn't be the same if this card would be banned. For me anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted November 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Is it just me who thinks there are better choices for cards that need to be banned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The ReBeL Posted November 7, 2010 Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 well card is good but other stuff would need to go like the better harder version to get out(not neccisarily) but junk archer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted November 7, 2010 Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 [quote name='THe ReBeL' timestamp='1289093222' post='4767181'] well card is good but other stuff would need to go like the better harder version to get out(not neccisarily) but junk archer [/quote] ...is this insinuating JUNK ARCHER is more broken than Chaos Sorcerer? Please tell me I just misunderstood this post. Junk Archer is a level 7 Synchro requiring Junk Synchron, and only removes one monster for the duration of the turn, not permanently. This is a Special Summon requiring a Light and Dark from the Grave and can remove faceup monsters permanently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The ReBeL Posted November 7, 2010 Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 well junk can attack that turn just saying a quickdraw can be used. Chaos is way easier though and a simple lightsworn monster and fill the requirements for him to remove a threat like armor master for ever unlike junk which would die next turn. Chaos is way broken just saying archer has pluses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted November 7, 2010 Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 Then I am misunderstanding, and you're not saying Junk Archer should be on the banlist before Chaos? Phew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The ReBeL Posted November 7, 2010 Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 if junk archer hit the bann list then junk archers effect would allow it to be removed for ever and not allow this card to be targeted by monster, spell, and trap effects Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted November 7, 2010 Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1289094949' post='4767292'] Then I am misunderstanding, and you're not saying Junk Archer should be on the banlist before Chaos? Phew. [/quote] [quote name='THe ReBeL' timestamp='1289095556' post='4767325'] if junk archer hit the bann list then junk archers effect would allow it to be removed for ever and not allow this card to be targeted by monster, spell, and trap effects [/quote] HOW DARE BOTH OF YOU SAY CHAOS SORCERER SHOULD HIT THE BANLIST. ....it was both of you wasn't it? I mean come on, Limited is good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted November 7, 2010 Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 Very powerful. I wouldn't say broken, but I can see why he would be called that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted November 7, 2010 Report Share Posted November 7, 2010 [quote name='Anbu-of-Sand' timestamp='1289097071' post='4767423'] HOW DARE BOTH OF YOU SAY CHAOS SORCERER SHOULD HIT THE BANLIST. ....it was both of you wasn't it? I mean come on, Limited is good enough. [/quote] Actually, silly Anbu-of-Chaos-Sorcerer-Obsession, I have not suggested it at all. But I thought Rebel was saying there were better things than Chaos Sorcerer to ban. Like Junk Archer, triggering my "what?" I am aware Chaos Sorcerer is good, very good. Maybe bannable, but I'm not going to complain about Chaos Sorcerer until more broken things die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.